Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
86 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
******* Senate Impeachment Live Thread 2 - 1/25 ******* (Original Post) Mersky Jan 2020 OP
Boy for all the attacks on Schiff's appearance this Philbin guy makes Jared look like a tough guy underpants Jan 2020 #1
They are now claiming Trump had a good reason for madaboutharry Jan 2020 #2
So Philbin is assigned to do the "process" argument BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #3
Criticizing the House "process" with "only by a vote of the House," prebutted by Schiff last night. ancianita Jan 2020 #4
Brilliant real time debunking by the House Intel Committee on Twitter. nolabear Jan 2020 #5
THIS IS BRILLIANT! Mike 03 Jan 2020 #13
Not only has there not been an Oval Office meeting, but 45 told Zelensky when they met at the UN mnhtnbb Jan 2020 #14
Cool. Mersky Jan 2020 #72
Philbin went for a walk in the woods there underpants Jan 2020 #6
So an old rule "about a vote by the full House" overrides the Constitution, in this argument. ancianita Jan 2020 #7
There was a vote to initiate the intel committee underpants Jan 2020 #10
?? I'm not sure what you're trying to say. The Intel Committee is a standing committee. ancianita Jan 2020 #20
I meant to initiate the Impeachment hearing underpants Jan 2020 #23
I'm just waiting for one of his folksy witticisms given in monotone voice Mersky Jan 2020 #8
He acts like there was NEVER a vote by the full house. That's bullshit. kag Jan 2020 #9
Thank you. underpants Jan 2020 #12
Oh so NOW precedent is important. kag Jan 2020 #11
Philburn Botany Jan 2020 #15
Lol. philburn. Mersky Jan 2020 #21
I only could watch about 3 minutes and that is what I thought his name was. Botany Jan 2020 #24
From what I read about reals regarding subpoenas... LiberalFighter Jan 2020 #79
I'm sure that Philbin knows that his argument is specious but he is not bothered by that or is ... Botany Jan 2020 #81
Is he sure he's gonna get paid? By Dump? cp Jan 2020 #82
+1 Botany Jan 2020 #86
This whole argument is maddening. kag Jan 2020 #16
They took the ball and went home. Now they haz sad they forfeited the game. underpants Jan 2020 #28
Is there a baby in there or has 45 shown up? nolabear Jan 2020 #17
Well, if nothing else people will be bored to death and tune out. nolabear Jan 2020 #18
F it dweller Jan 2020 #19
In Ukraine, I think. kag Jan 2020 #22
That's hilarious. I love DU humor as much as DU knowledge. ALBliberal Jan 2020 #30
Yup. DU keeps me sane. n/t kag Jan 2020 #41
Still waiting for someone to explain why Trump procon Jan 2020 #25
Ugh. kag Jan 2020 #26
Dear trump lawyers...Government Accountability Office - the White House broke the Law... spanone Jan 2020 #27
Here it is, the whistleblower shell game of 'who's the one with integrity' Mersky Jan 2020 #29
Not watching, but judging by this thread, Schiff hit all their defense arguments Blaukraut Jan 2020 #31
Okay that was complete BS about the whistleblower meeting Schiff's staff underpants Jan 2020 #32
Cippy cup - "Good news - just a few more minutes" from us BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #33
How is it relevant that the Mueller investigation cost $32 million. kag Jan 2020 #34
Did he just say Chairman Schiff-ty? Botany Jan 2020 #35
The impeachment environment melm00se Jan 2020 #36
The GOP is not even "pounding the table" absent both the law or the facts! BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #38
More polishing the turd than pounding the table from the little I have seen. yellowcanine Jan 2020 #51
And trying BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #58
Um, exactly who on the Democratic side pounded the table? hedda_foil Jan 2020 #54
never said who was melm00se Jan 2020 #67
You didn't say who you meant so I asked you to make any Dems in that category. hedda_foil Jan 2020 #71
I can't believe that he is going over the WH invitations to meet BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #37
Yeah he also talked about a meeting in Poland that didn't happen either underpants Jan 2020 #43
OMG! There was a hurricane???? kag Jan 2020 #39
the sharpie hurricane forecast map ... dweller Jan 2020 #40
Was that the same Hurricane ? underpants Jan 2020 #45
Yes. Was Dorian. Mersky Jan 2020 #52
Thanks underpants Jan 2020 #60
me either dweller Jan 2020 #53
Is a reeeal strong point they made, isn't it?! Mersky Jan 2020 #66
Over and done malaise Jan 2020 #42
And that was that. Less than 2 hours BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #44
Felt a lot longer underpants Jan 2020 #50
It felt like that because they talked so slowly BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #56
Oh no, the pResident couldn't go to Poland because hurricane, aka golfing Mersky Jan 2020 #46
If the Rs intended to make an impact with today's testimony they failed miserably. nt in2herbs Jan 2020 #47
***ADJOURNED FOR THE DAY UNTIL 1:00PM ET MONDAY JAN. 27,2020*** BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #48
Wait, what. Is the clock still running? C_U_L8R Jan 2020 #70
No. They go by how much is used up during a "session" BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #77
So Dems had to present into the night across 3 days C_U_L8R Jan 2020 #78
No, I don't think it worked that way BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #83
Thanks BRDS! C_U_L8R Jan 2020 #84
You are welcome BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #85
Impeachment Cartoon ariadne0614 Jan 2020 #49
Spookily accurate read. Mersky Jan 2020 #55
Thank you Mersky for the threads!!! BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #57
You know you're so very welcome! Mersky Jan 2020 #62
Thank you Mersky underpants Jan 2020 #59
Thank you for being in here! Mersky Jan 2020 #63
Thanks Mersky! Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2020 #61
Hi! You're doing your part to make these threads worthwhile! Mersky Jan 2020 #64
Ha! missed 'em today ... Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2020 #74
Oh gee whiz is it over already. I guess dump got one right that it was a ratings disaster I sure UniteFightBack Jan 2020 #65
Thank you, Mersky. Republican argument tracking is the hardest work there is. ancianita Jan 2020 #68
Good readers and listeners... Mersky Jan 2020 #75
Thank you, Mersky! gademocrat7 Jan 2020 #69
OMG over before we even woke up on the West Coast Generic Other Jan 2020 #73
Am glad you're in here! Mersky Jan 2020 #76
Lanksford should know better uponit7771 Jan 2020 #80

madaboutharry

(40,212 posts)
2. They are now claiming Trump had a good reason for
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:34 PM
Jan 2020

resisting every subpoena and request for documents.

#1: We didn't like the way you issued your subpoenas.
#2: We didn't assert executive privilege because we didn't like
the way you issued your subpoenas.
#3: We didn't like the way you conducted business in the
House. We don't think subcommittees count.

BumRushDaShow

(129,069 posts)
3. So Philbin is assigned to do the "process" argument
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:35 PM
Jan 2020

which was completely debunked the past couple days.

ancianita

(36,063 posts)
4. Criticizing the House "process" with "only by a vote of the House," prebutted by Schiff last night.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:35 PM
Jan 2020

All this "doesn't make sense" bullshit hyperrationalization on "valid" subpoenas.

mnhtnbb

(31,392 posts)
14. Not only has there not been an Oval Office meeting, but 45 told Zelensky when they met at the UN
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:41 PM
Jan 2020

to work things out himself with Putin.

In other words, no help from me, with your aggressor (because he's my puppet master).

Mersky

(4,982 posts)
72. Cool.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 01:49 PM
Jan 2020

Thanks for bringing that in. Am sharing it around.

Journaling the House Intel’s realtime debunking of the WH ‘defense’.

Eta: Link to the House Managers press conference after the ‘defense’ team’s appearance. Is another great round of debunking: https://www.c-span.org/video/?468583-1/house-impeachment-managers-hold-news-conference&live

underpants

(182,826 posts)
6. Philbin went for a walk in the woods there
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:36 PM
Jan 2020

It's his review of the house and senate roles and his hypothetical on the Senate having a committee.

ancianita

(36,063 posts)
7. So an old rule "about a vote by the full House" overrides the Constitution, in this argument.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:36 PM
Jan 2020

What a bullshit line of argument.

Mersky

(4,982 posts)
8. I'm just waiting for one of his folksy witticisms given in monotone voice
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:36 PM
Jan 2020

I assure you he will have gotten it from calendar and clock, doug collins.

kag

(4,079 posts)
9. He acts like there was NEVER a vote by the full house. That's bullshit.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:40 PM
Jan 2020

They just don't like WHEN it was.

Botany

(70,516 posts)
15. Philburn
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:43 PM
Jan 2020

So the full house has to vote before a committee can issue a subponea? When did that become a law?

And since the DoJ aka Bill Barr rejected everything from the House Committee
so everybody in the White House is above the law?

*******

BTW they can't argue the facts of the case so all they can do is make process
arguments.

Mersky

(4,982 posts)
21. Lol. philburn.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:45 PM
Jan 2020

And they used the subpoena rules instituted by the republicans when they were in the majority.

Botany

(70,516 posts)
24. I only could watch about 3 minutes and that is what I thought his name was.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:49 PM
Jan 2020

He is arguing from the absurd but he looks good doing it. These motherfuckers are working
for the destruction of democracy in America.

The Rude Pundit summed it up very nicely.
"And, frankly, Republicans are more obsessed with 2016 now than Democrats are because they know, they fucking know, that Trump's victory is illegitimate and they have to do everything in their power to not let that fact become viral."

Botany

(70,516 posts)
81. I'm sure that Philbin knows that his argument is specious but he is not bothered by that or is ...
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 02:36 PM
Jan 2020

... paid more than enough that he can sleep @ night. And all the republican senators know that
argument is specious too and they know that Trump is guilty as hell but so many of them are so
deep into the corruption that they don't care and or will vote to acquit out of self defense.



The Rude Pundit has already summed it all up nicely.
"And, frankly, Republicans are more obsessed with 2016 now than Democrats are because they know, they fucking know, that Trump's victory is illegitimate and they have to do everything in their power to not let that fact become viral."

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100212904164

kag

(4,079 posts)
16. This whole argument is maddening.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:43 PM
Jan 2020

He makes it sound like "if they had just done it right, we would have gladly handed over all the stuff they asked for." Which is bullshit.

The documents the House asked for are important. So if the Senate now asks for them, are they gonna just hand them all over?

underpants

(182,826 posts)
28. They took the ball and went home. Now they haz sad they forfeited the game.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:50 PM
Jan 2020

Too bad. He's been impeached.

procon

(15,805 posts)
25. Still waiting for someone to explain why Trump
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:49 PM
Jan 2020

withheld the money and then tried to cover it up by ordering everyone not to to talk about it or inform Ukraine.

This is pitiful!

So far all I'm hearing is a tirade about burden sharing which isn't in the articles of impeachment. It's a distraction at best. They can't actually discuss the facts because Trump is guilty so we have this slow motion crawl of Trumpian talking points to fill up their designated airtime.

spanone

(135,844 posts)
27. Dear trump lawyers...Government Accountability Office - the White House broke the Law...
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:50 PM
Jan 2020
London (CNN)In the months since news broke that the Trump administration temporarily withheld $400 million in military aid to Ukraine, the report on Thursday by the Government Accountability Office that the White House broke the law by its actions will rank as one of the biggest bombshells.

While there are no criminal penalties from the GAO ruling, it will certainly invigorate the Democrats' efforts to hold President Donald Trump and his accomplices accountable for their repugnant behavior. The process for Trump's impeachment trial in the Senate began Thursday with the presentation of the articles of impeachment.

The GAO ruling will also force the White House further into crisis mode. It is difficult to keep count of the number of times that many among us assumed there was enough solid evidence to turn the legal and political tide against Trump. But each time it looked like the administration was pushed to the edge of the cliff, it has managed to slip away in the court of public opinion.

But we may be getting to the point where even the Teflon President can't wriggle free.


https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/16/opinions/trump-gao-report-bombshell-military-aid-ukraine-illegal-bociurkiw/

Mersky

(4,982 posts)
29. Here it is, the whistleblower shell game of 'who's the one with integrity'
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:51 PM
Jan 2020

Good grief, they love to manufacture boogeymen out of good guys.

Blaukraut

(5,693 posts)
31. Not watching, but judging by this thread, Schiff hit all their defense arguments
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:52 PM
Jan 2020

in his prebuttal last night. Every single one!

underpants

(182,826 posts)
32. Okay that was complete BS about the whistleblower meeting Schiff's staff
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:53 PM
Jan 2020

"The whistleblower was given some guidance"

Schiff's staff stepped back and said "You need to get a lawyer" and got the hell away.

kag

(4,079 posts)
34. How is it relevant that the Mueller investigation cost $32 million.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:55 PM
Jan 2020

Taxpayers have spent waaaayyyy more than that on Trump's fucking golf trips.

Botany

(70,516 posts)
35. Did he just say Chairman Schiff-ty?
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:55 PM
Jan 2020

I have to turn it off. The whistleblower's actions and his or her I.D. is protected by law.

melm00se

(4,993 posts)
36. The impeachment environment
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:57 PM
Jan 2020

and behavior reminds me of this quote

If you’re weak on the facts and strong on the law, pound the law.
If you’re weak on the law and strong on the facts, pound the facts.
If you’re weak on both, pound the table.


There are people on both sides of this issue who can be slotted in each of these categories.

yellowcanine

(35,699 posts)
51. More polishing the turd than pounding the table from the little I have seen.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 01:05 PM
Jan 2020

And it is still a turd. Silk purse, sow's ear also comes to mind.

melm00se

(4,993 posts)
67. never said who was
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 01:38 PM
Jan 2020

in each category.

This is not a perfect quote but it just sums up the way I see people behaving.

It should be noted that I think that there should be a 4th category:

When you are strong on the law and strong the facts, your opponent is well and truly fucked.

hedda_foil

(16,375 posts)
71. You didn't say who you meant so I asked you to make any Dems in that category.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 01:49 PM
Jan 2020

You've inserted a slur on Dems as well as repukes by claiming that both sides did it. I challenge you to name one including a specific example of how they just pounded the table.

BumRushDaShow

(129,069 posts)
37. I can't believe that he is going over the WH invitations to meet
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:58 PM
Jan 2020

but the point WAS that Zelensky has STILL NOT HAD the "Oval Office meeting".

kag

(4,079 posts)
39. OMG! There was a hurricane????
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 01:00 PM
Jan 2020

Ask the people of Puerto Rico how many fucks Trump gives about dealing with hurricanes.

Mersky

(4,982 posts)
66. Is a reeeal strong point they made, isn't it?!
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 01:38 PM
Jan 2020

Lol. They do it to themselves. Pound the table and reference the sharpie gate days.

underpants

(182,826 posts)
50. Felt a lot longer
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 01:04 PM
Jan 2020

But DU was fun as usual.

Cipollone almost went into a Mr. Rogers mode there at the end.

BumRushDaShow

(129,069 posts)
77. No. They go by how much is used up during a "session"
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 02:08 PM
Jan 2020

And usually at the beginning of the next session, they will inform the parties how much time remains from the allocated time.

Each side was allocated 24 hours to present and Democrats used about 21 hours of the max 24 hours. So far the GOP has used around 2 hours of their 24 hours.

C_U_L8R

(45,003 posts)
78. So Dems had to present into the night across 3 days
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 02:11 PM
Jan 2020

and the President's defense can parse it out as long as they like? Apologies, I'm just not grokking why today was just two hours.

BumRushDaShow

(129,069 posts)
83. No, I don't think it worked that way
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 03:13 PM
Jan 2020

I think the rules were that each side could spread their "24 hour allocation" of presentations over 3 days, regardless of how many hours of that 24 they would eventually use. So it ended up this way due to when the House Managers started (which was on a Wednesday - but each session started in the afternoon at 1 pm ET and there would be about an hour or so worth of breaks during that time each day) and when they were done, which was yesterday (Friday). The Dem Managers used about 21 hours of the 24 - making for a long 3 days because they were directed to start in the afternoon. So it ended up the GOP would then logically start "the next day" after our side was done, which would be today (Saturday). And since obviously everyone was burnt out, I think everyone agreed that they would make it a short Saturday with just their opening statements.

So the GOP had today, and will have Monday, and Tuesday to use up their 24 hours (they have only used about 2 hours so far), although they probably have nowhere near 24 hours prepared for their presentation.

BumRushDaShow

(129,069 posts)
85. You are welcome
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 03:18 PM
Jan 2020

Hopefully what I wrote sortof makes sense because I am still operating on vapors today.

Hermit-The-Prog

(33,349 posts)
61. Thanks Mersky!
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 01:23 PM
Jan 2020

Just got here, found I've missed the whole thing (breakin my heart), and can now go back and read about all the earthshattering new! improved! exculpatory evidence that was presented.

Mersky

(4,982 posts)
64. Hi! You're doing your part to make these threads worthwhile!
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 01:34 PM
Jan 2020

Whether commenting (a lot) or READING. Is all good stuff.

Hermit-The-Prog

(33,349 posts)
74. Ha! missed 'em today ...
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 01:53 PM
Jan 2020

Time zone (and sleep) got me today. I thought the first hour would be mostly squawling, so planned to look in about 11 am. Oops. They started at 10 eastern, 9 central and were finished by the time I came to your 2nd thread!

 

UniteFightBack

(8,231 posts)
65. Oh gee whiz is it over already. I guess dump got one right that it was a ratings disaster I sure
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 01:36 PM
Jan 2020

didn't watch it and I'm sorry but they are done in 2 hours..........???? Says it all.

ancianita

(36,063 posts)
68. Thank you, Mersky. Republican argument tracking is the hardest work there is.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 01:40 PM
Jan 2020

Everyone here could have taken the easy way out and not listened. But they didn't, which makes DU all the greater.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»******* Senate Impeachmen...