Romney 'Very Likely' to Vote for Witnesses

[applegrove]

Romney ‘Very Likely’ to Vote for Witnesses

January 25, 2020 at 4:04 pm EST By Taegan Goddard 50 Comments

https://politicalwire.com/2020/01/25/romney-very-likely-to-vote-for-witnesses/

"SNIP.....

Sen. Mitt Romney told CNN that it’s “very likely” that he’ll be in favor of calling witnesses in the impeachment trial of President Trump, but won’t decide until after opening arguments.

New York Times: Lamar Alexander is GOP wildcard on witnesses.

......SNIP"

[Vinca]

1. Uh huh and Susan Collins is still "concerned."

[Control-Z]

8. That pike thing, I believe it upset her.

She's probably going to have nightmares about it. Poor Susan Collins.

[NCLefty]

20. Maybe she'll be too upset to adhere to the oaths she took...

[Skittles]

2. voting......for witnesses in an impeachment trial

IT SOUNDS RIDICULOUS.

[underpants]

4. Mmmmm more information or less information

[Marie Marie]

5. That's because it IS!!

[underpants]

3. The only reason I can think of for him to be in anyway resistant to opposing Trump

is that he thinks he has another run for POTUS in him and he's scared of the cult.

[at140]

6. +100

[yortsed snacilbuper]

14. He ain't got nothing to lose,

why kowtow to the orange blob?

[DanieRains]

7. Profile In Courage!

Yeah right....

[diva77]

16. Profile in Scourge, like the rest of the rethugs

[0rganism]

9. "when a man lies he murders some part of the world"

"you should know that"

[maxsolomon]

10. He probably will.

And McConnell will deal with it. As long as Alexander stays in the fold, McConnell will let Rmoney run free. 51-49 is still a win.

Who'll get to be 49? Collins? Gardner? Murks?

[chowder66]

11. Sounds like he sent a bat signal to Trump to get something to stop him from voting for witnesses.

Why say "very likely" out loud?

[JHB]

12. "Won't decide until" is proof you NEVER deserve the presidency, Mitt

You have the opportunity to do the right thing, and you're failing. Just as you did in 2012.

[applegrove]

13. And not like the voters of Utah would punish him if he voted for

witnesses. They voted for him knowing full well he was anti-Trump. Am I right?

[Hekate]

15. Be careful, Mittens, or you'll become the male version of Susan Collins...

We've been expecting better of you.

[keithbvadu2]

17. No matter. Repubs have already pre-announced their verdict.

[RANDYWILDMAN]

18. all votes will end up with at least 51 repubs

not matter what mittens does. More bad things will come out and repubs won't care and won't remove him. They have power and care about nothing else.

[Generic Brad]

19. And would those witnesses be named Biden?

There is no way anyone in the GOP would call a witness that has first hand knowledge of Trump’s crimes.