Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,102 posts)
Fri Feb 7, 2020, 01:35 PM Feb 2020

Appeals court rules Democrats lack legal standing to sue Trump over alleged emoluments violations

JFC.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/federal-appeals-court-dismisses-trump-emoluments-case-n1132441?fbclid=IwAR1Nkw6LDTvdtItc4R3pJL3u_h8fQapQWQ-wH07yYzrstCy-BbabYlfXB1c

Appeals court rules Democrats lack legal standing to sue Trump over alleged emoluments violations
The suit, which was dismissed on technical grounds, argued the president has violated the Constitution with his businesses, including a hotel popular with foreign officials.
Appeals court: Members of Congress lack legal standing for Trump emoluments suit
Feb. 7, 202001:47
Feb. 7, 2020, 10:51 AM EST
By Dareh Gregorian


A federal appeals court on Friday dismissed Democratic lawmakers' lawsuit against President Donald Trump alleging he has violated the emoluments clause of the U.S. Constitution on technical grounds.

In the ruling, the three-judge panel of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia found the members of Congress did not have legal standing to bring the lawsuit against the president for violating the clause, which bars federal officials from collecting payments from foreign governments without the approval of Congress.

In their unsigned ruling, the judges cited Supreme Court precedent, noting the 215 lawmakers on the lawsuit are not the majority of Congress, and that they might have had standing if they had filed the suit as a majority. "[O]nly an institution can assert an institutional injury," the ruling says.

"Here, regardless of rigor, our conclusion is straightforward because the members — 29 senators and 186 members of the House of Representatives — do not constitute a majority of either body and are, therefore, powerless to approve or deny the president’s acceptance of foreign emoluments," the decision says.


Democratic senators and House members argued the president frequently violates the rule with his businesses, including a Washington, D.C., hotel that's popular with foreign government officials.

The constitutional clause at issue in the case reads, "no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state."

Trump told reporters on the White House lawn that the suit was "another phony case."

"It was a total win," he said.
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Appeals court rules Democrats lack legal standing to sue Trump over alleged emoluments violations (Original Post) babylonsister Feb 2020 OP
Keep the House, win the Senate, sue him again. Efilroft Sul Feb 2020 #1
What are you talking about? Yes we keep the House and win the Senate and win the Presidency rockfordfile Feb 2020 #4
That, too. And sue him again. Efilroft Sul Feb 2020 #6
I agree. n/t EndlessWire Feb 2020 #14
I have spent my morning Mme. Defarge Feb 2020 #2
I'm so damned disgusted. nt babylonsister Feb 2020 #3
Did they say...?? D_Master81 Feb 2020 #5
The article doesn't precisely explain the ruling... brooklynite Feb 2020 #7
The lead judge is a liberal Clinton appointee NewJeffCT Feb 2020 #8
So it takes a majority of Congress to enforce the Constitution? ThoughtCriminal Feb 2020 #9
Did you feel that way when the birther suits were being dismissed for lack of standing? onenote Feb 2020 #10
No, I did not think that lack of standing was the real issue ThoughtCriminal Feb 2020 #11
As more and more of his regressive court nominees get on the bench thanks to Moscow Mitch totodeinhere Feb 2020 #12
Appeals Courts dominated by Trump appointees. We're fucked and things will get worse. She_Totally_Gets_It Feb 2020 #13

brooklynite

(94,803 posts)
7. The article doesn't precisely explain the ruling...
Fri Feb 7, 2020, 02:14 PM
Feb 2020

The Court ruled (unanimously) that House and Senate members AS INDIVIDUALS did not have standing to sue; the House AS AN INSTITUTION could.

ThoughtCriminal

(14,050 posts)
9. So it takes a majority of Congress to enforce the Constitution?
Fri Feb 7, 2020, 04:10 PM
Feb 2020

Makes. No. Sense.

Everyone, anyone, should have standing.

This case should be a slam dunk. Idiots. I don't care who appointed them.

onenote

(42,793 posts)
10. Did you feel that way when the birther suits were being dismissed for lack of standing?
Fri Feb 7, 2020, 04:53 PM
Feb 2020

Probably not.

The reasoning in this case is pretty much the same as in the birther suits. It was correct there, and it is correct here.

ThoughtCriminal

(14,050 posts)
11. No, I did not think that lack of standing was the real issue
Fri Feb 7, 2020, 07:33 PM
Feb 2020

they completely lacked merit. President Obama was a citizen. Period - case closed. They should have been dismissed on those grounds.

totodeinhere

(13,059 posts)
12. As more and more of his regressive court nominees get on the bench thanks to Moscow Mitch
Fri Feb 7, 2020, 07:35 PM
Feb 2020

we are going to see more and more of this. The lasting damage he has done to our country is extensive. It depresses me just to think of it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Appeals court rules Democ...