Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,793 posts)
Sat Feb 22, 2020, 09:14 PM Feb 2020

O'Brien Says 'No Intelligence Behind' Meddling Claims

O’Brien Says ‘No Intelligence Behind’ Meddling Claims

February 22, 2020 at 7:40 pm EST By Taegan Goddard 22 Comments

https://politicalwire.com/2020/02/22/obrien-says-no-intelligence-behind-meddling-claims/

"SNIP.....

National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien told CBS News he disputed reports of what was presented during a House Intelligence Committee that Russian are interfering to help President Trump in the presidential election.

Said O’Brien: “I haven’t seen any intelligence to support the reports that were leaked out of the House. But it’s just hard to comment on that because, again, I wasn’t there. And these are leaks that were coming from a House Intel Committee hearing. I haven’t seen any intelligence that would back up what I’m reading in the papers.” 

.......SNIP"

Interesting that Trump and republicans seem to be out of the loop. I mean Nunes had to tell Trump. Maybe he roars at anyone who gives him intel on russia interference that makes it hard to tell him things.

Update: https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/02/22/politics/nsa-robert-obrien-intelligence-russia-help-sanders-trump/index.html?__twitter_impression=true

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
O'Brien Says 'No Intelligence Behind' Meddling Claims (Original Post) applegrove Feb 2020 OP
Cover up . . . Iliyah Feb 2020 #1
Well, he would dispute FBI findings. Trump doesn't like them. He got rid of top tier agents over emmaverybo Feb 2020 #2
CIA wil know, whether from their own intelligence or others. MontanaFarmer Feb 2020 #3
He's a Trump sycophant Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 2020 #4
Nope, don't see a thing to indicate Russia interfering...... lastlib Feb 2020 #5
Fingers in the ears saying "la la la la la". applegrove Feb 2020 #6
Just read another OP "were you there" and here's "I wasn't there" Hermit-The-Prog Feb 2020 #7
I don't know what it is. Something is weird. applegrove Feb 2020 #8
Some strange rationalization for lying, maybe? Hermit-The-Prog Feb 2020 #9
Here is more info. applegrove Feb 2020 #10
Looks to me like Republican damage control and coverup. Hermit-The-Prog Feb 2020 #11
Creepy world we live in when the president doesn't want to stop any possible applegrove Feb 2020 #12

emmaverybo

(8,144 posts)
2. Well, he would dispute FBI findings. Trump doesn't like them. He got rid of top tier agents over
Sat Feb 22, 2020, 09:25 PM
Feb 2020

Russia and will do so again. We might find nothing more out.

MontanaFarmer

(630 posts)
3. CIA wil know, whether from their own intelligence or others.
Sat Feb 22, 2020, 09:32 PM
Feb 2020

We'll find out, the question is will anyone care?

Hermit-The-Prog

(33,439 posts)
7. Just read another OP "were you there" and here's "I wasn't there"
Sat Feb 22, 2020, 10:37 PM
Feb 2020

The other OP was asking when did "were you there" become an argument against facts.

This is interesting.

applegrove

(118,793 posts)
12. Creepy world we live in when the president doesn't want to stop any possible
Sun Feb 23, 2020, 12:08 AM
Feb 2020

Last edited Sun Feb 23, 2020, 01:50 AM - Edit history (4)

attack on Democracy in his own country when the information is ambiguous. I can see it now: Trump will say during the GE that Putin is helping democrats (Bernie) and that they never helped him. It is opposite world. Almost like Trump was enraged that his former Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire didn't stop it - the naming of the Trump campaign as a beneficiary of Putin actions during the election this year. Almost like he had assurances Trump would not be obviously targetted by Putin. And then it got back to him by Nunes that the House had been briefed to the contrary of their hoped narrative for the election.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»O'Brien Says 'No Intellig...