General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm working on swaying anti-Obama voters to vote against Romney
Last edited Sun Sep 9, 2012, 01:37 PM - Edit history (1)
I have a lot of family and friends in Virginia who won't vote for Obama but don't like Rmoney. I thought I'd give them the chance to vote for an alternative to Rmoney, so I liked Gary Johnson, the libertarian candidate. These are people who would not vote for Obama under any circumstances, so if I can't get them to vote FOR Obama, I'll try to get them to take a vote AWAY from Rmoney.
In the close states a vote for Johnson is a vote for Obama.
Edited per suggestions in the thread. I AM NOT endorsing Johnson, or any candidate other than Barack Obama. If you read my Facebook posts there is nothing in them that suggests that I support Johnson and that I advocate voting AGAINST Obama. Every post I make is pro Obama, pro Democratic party, and pro Liberal. I am simply trying to hurt the Romney campaign by directing votes Obama would never get away from his opponent.
banned from Kos
(4,017 posts)and may hurt their chances in Arizona and Nevada too.
auburngrad82
(5,029 posts)If Johnson (and to a lesser extent Virgil Goode) can take votes away from Rmoney in those states we'll be looking at a second term for Obama.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)Rules is rules.
auburngrad82
(5,029 posts)Johnson and Goode being on the ballot in Virginia can only help Obama win. Johnson and Goode will take votes away from Rmoney, which is why I want my Virginia family and friends to be aware that they have options. They won't vote for Obama. But they might vote for an alternative to Rmoney. After all, when we talk politics, they always say "Democrats or Republicans, they're all the same."
frazzled
(18,402 posts)I don't think you can say where to draw the line.
By simply "liking" someone on Facebook, there is no message being sent besides "I like this candidate." You might be convincing some Obama frence-sitters just as well. There are "left-leaning" Libertarians, too. Or didn't you know that?
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Poster is not advocating Johnson instead of Obama. They are advocating suggesting Johnson to RW voters instead of Romney... voters who would never vote for Obama anyway. If you were the alerter, then you were completely out of order, and being incredibly petty.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)(Though I respect their decision.)
Liking someone on Facebook is an act of advocacy that could have repercussions in any direction, not just for right-wingers. It is NOT something we should be doing or advocating. It's stupid.
Walk away
(9,494 posts)Grateful for Hope
(39,320 posts)Just 'sayin.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)I don't think you're thinking enough.
Grateful for Hope
(39,320 posts)auburngrad82
(5,029 posts)he's spewing. Doesn't mean they support him.
Speck Tater
(10,618 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)LoveIsNow
(356 posts)I've been telling all my angsty Atlas Shrugged college conservative peers to stick it to Romney and vote for Johnson for the same reason, and they all seem to like the idea. He does seem pretty genuine and likeable, so it's really not hard.
Mayberry Machiavelli
(21,096 posts)If so, I think THAT is the money play there.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)in order to siphon off votes from Mitt, and to drive wedges deeper into their party.
Virgil Goode needs to get past Cuccinelli's machinations first, I hope that there are some civic-minded people out there helping him.
I try to help the Good Right Wing Teabagger Christians I talk to who are worried about that Mormon guy and who would never vote for Obama make the best decision in order to keep their conscience clear by suggesting viable alternatives.
Anything done to keep votes away from Money Man Mitt is all good.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)but some there are here who insist that voting 3rd party could never help a Republican to win.
Yet my recent issue of The Nation, was all upset that Jill Stein and Rocky Anderson won't be included in Presidential debates.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)But, she always seem to show up to hurt the democrat vote count during close elections. She did the same when Deval Patrick was running for re-election. Stein did get 3% that would have changed the election, but fortunately independents broke hard for Patrick and helped other sane voters give him a 6% victory. Massachusetts is a better state today because Stein failed to hand the republican the election.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)Have their supporters do some leg work, get some petitions sgned by registered voters, show that they just aren't on the fringes.
TeamPooka
(24,228 posts)A vote for Obama is a vote for Obama.
Votes for others by Democrats do not help anyone.
This is a Democratic site for those that support the Party and it's candidates so who are you telling to vote for Johnson?
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)vote for Johnson (RATHER THAN ROMNEY!) are effectively voting for Obama. Same effect accomplished when demoralized Repubs stay home and do not vote at all.
Am I missing something here?
Autumn
(45,098 posts)so they are not Democrats . If you read the entire post it becomes clear.
TeamPooka
(24,228 posts)Walk away
(9,494 posts)that she endorses Johnson? I don't think it's ever a good idea to endorse anyone but your candidate.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)I just saw a Public Policy Polling poll that showed Obama losing three votes to Johnson for every two Romney loses, and it's a close race. Johnson is polling 5%, which is pretty strong for a Libertarian.
Marijuana policy is an issue in Colorado. They have the feds shutting down dispensaries, they have legalization on the ballot, and they have Johnson running hard on the issue in the state.
TeamPooka
(24,228 posts)abumbyanyothername
(2,711 posts)the party of ideas would be willing to allow the electorate to express their opinion and would be willing to listen to the expression that occurs.
Particularly if they are losing votes because they are adopting Republican Party approaches to marijuana.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)own, I say!
Response to auburngrad82 (Original post)
savalez This message was self-deleted by its author.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)Does one have to shove their heads up their butts to conclude that if a person that may have voted for Obama doesn't vote for Obama or sits home helps? Ghosts of 2000 again where the Nader people maked their fuckup by blaming Gore, not themselves.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)It's some Democrats who keep blaming their fuckup on Nader. I don't think the Naderites blamed Gore for their not winning.
pokerfan
(27,677 posts)Former congressman Virgil Goode Jr. has qualified for the presidential ballot in Virginia, the State Board of Elections ruled Tuesday, adding a potential obstacle to Republican Mitt Romneys hopes of winning the pivotal state.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/va-politics/virgil-goode-makes-presidential-ballot-in-virginia/2012/09/04/c5c57ea6-f698-11e1-8398-0327ab83ab91_story.html
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)Southwest VA...
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)If your intent is what you say it is, then edit to say something like: To make my Virginia relatives NOT vote for Romney...
And then tell about Johnson in he body of the message. We don't want to advertise for Johnson on DU, right?
GreenPartyVoter
(72,377 posts)the realllly conservative folks.
madokie
(51,076 posts)You just may be doing a lot more good than any of us might think. I don't think Obama has a problem with getting reelected but I would like to see that he wins by the largest landslide in history. He won by a substantial more votes than they reported the last time, I'd about bet money on that.