General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsexboyfil
(17,863 posts)dhol82
(9,353 posts)I might feel bad if he truly comes down with it. Maybe.
MontanaMama
(23,314 posts)Karma. Is. A. Bitch.
htuttle
(23,738 posts)This is where we are.
dem4decades
(11,288 posts)doc03
(35,332 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,590 posts)femmedem
(8,201 posts)and modeling how to act when you know you've been exposed.
dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)Pachamama
(16,887 posts)It is possible they could be spreading around to so many Trump and GOP...
uponit7771
(90,336 posts)liberalla
(9,247 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)The statement is pretty clear.
CanonRay
(14,101 posts)This is too good to be true
RockCreek
(739 posts)Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)And Trump contained it. Member?
Demovictory9
(32,454 posts)pat_k
(9,313 posts)???
I poked around a little and came across the following, which appears to indicate you can test positive BEFORE symptoms appear, but that the detection rate is not 100%. It does not say that the test is "ineffective."
Not testing at all makes no sense to me. There are many diagnostic tests we subject ourselves too that fail to detect some percentage of the thing being tested for. That's why we retest. (e.g., get a pap every year because very early disease may not be detected). A negative result doesn't necessarily mean "you are in the clear." Knowing the "fail to detect" rate, you know how to interpret a negative.
Why the heck not test? Identify positives as soon as possible. Count the negatives as "untested" and line up retest.
Just because you can't trust a negative before symptoms (i.e., you still need to quarantine and monitor an asymptomatic person exposed to a known positive, even if they test negative) doesn't mean you don't test at all!
docgee
(870 posts)does that mean it's President Pelosi?
lame54
(35,287 posts)lame54
(35,287 posts)hamsterjill
(15,220 posts)What about the people who wont, Ted?
Thunderbeast
(3,408 posts)As little as I like Cruz, the thought that he will be a victim with influential friends is not bad. Cut him some slack. Let him get well. Maybe he will realize the impact of hoping away this health crisis.
UTUSN
(70,688 posts)zentrum
(9,865 posts)Julian English
(434 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)☠️
TXPaganBanker
(210 posts)COVID-19 has an incubation of 5-6 days AS HE STATES HIMSELF, and it's been 10 days. All he's doing is finding an excuse not to meet with constituents.
CloudWatcher
(1,848 posts)He's just hiding. There's no other reason for his behavior given the incubation period and lack of symptoms.
mcknzAlex
(10 posts)Maybe he did it because he is scared, but I don't know if it true or not.
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)Takket
(21,565 posts)Horse with no Name
(33,956 posts)Although I hope he was able to spend some time with his republican brethren