General Discussion

OhNo-Really

(3,985 posts) Mon Mar 9, 2020, 02:04 AM Mar 2020

This message was self-deleted by its author

This message was self-deleted by its author (OhNo-Really) on Sat Dec 10, 2022, 08:42 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author (Original Post) OhNo-Really Mar 2020 OP

1 test kit is capable of do something like 350-500 tests ... so that should make you mr_lebowski Mar 2020 #1

Do you have a link for this info. I could've find one. Thank y OhNo-Really Mar 2020 #2

This isn't where I saw it the other day, that article was more in depth, but I forget where it was . mr_lebowski Mar 2020 #5

Post removed Post removed Mar 2020 #3

Your information is not correct. Ms. Toad Mar 2020 #4

Actually they had to have two negative consecutive tests OhNo-Really Mar 2020 #8

52 states? cwydro Mar 2020 #6

😂😂 middle of the night post. Thank you OhNo-Really Mar 2020 #7

My head is spinning. Worse than working on my income tax.. question everything Mar 2020 #9

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)

1. 1 test kit is capable of do something like 350-500 tests ... so that should make you

Reply to OhNo-Really (Original post)

Mon Mar 9, 2020, 02:16 AM

Mar 2020

feel a little better.

But yeah ... I'm sure we're still way behind ...

OhNo-Really

(3,985 posts)

2. Do you have a link for this info. I could've find one. Thank y

Reply to mr_lebowski (Reply #1)

Mon Mar 9, 2020, 02:23 AM

Mar 2020

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)

5. This isn't where I saw it the other day, that article was more in depth, but I forget where it was .

Reply to OhNo-Really (Reply #2)

Mon Mar 9, 2020, 02:40 AM

Mar 2020

But this confirms the number ...

https://abc13.com/5985968/

"The lab currently has one testing kit with capacity to test 700 specimens, which equates to approximately 350 patients. The CDC said it will expedite additional kits as needed to meet the demand of local health department labs."

Response to OhNo-Really (Original post)

Name removed Message auto-removed

Ms. Toad

(34,069 posts)

4. Your information is not correct.

Reply to OhNo-Really (Original post)

Mon Mar 9, 2020, 02:34 AM

Mar 2020

They were each tested at least twice (not twice a day), and before they were released they had to have two negative tests at least 24 hours apart.

Officials from San Antonio and Bexar County released a CDC statement that said the person had been in quarantine for several weeks and tested negative for coronavirus on at least two occasions.
The person was released after meeting the CDC's criteria for release, which includes resolution of any symptoms and two consecutive negative tests collected more than 24 hours apart.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/02/health/wuhan-evacuee-san-antonio/index.html

OhNo-Really

(3,985 posts)

8. Actually they had to have two negative consecutive tests

Reply to Ms. Toad (Reply #4)

Mon Mar 9, 2020, 01:40 PM

Mar 2020

To be released after the 14 day quarantine

I’m just reporting a first hand report I heard (and rewound a couple of times to be sure I heard her correctly) from a quarantined citizen.

🤷🏻‍♀️ Such are the problems with professionals tethered by a Twitter terror