General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRachel Maddow: "If you read one thing today, read this": 👀
Link to tweet
Rachel Maddow MSNBC ✔@maddow
If you read one thing today, read this:
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/03/coronavirus-cancel-everything/607675/
Cancel Everything
Social distancing is the only way to stop the coronavirus. We must start immediately.
10:32 AM - Mar 10, 2020
Cancel Everything
Social distancing is the only way to stop the coronavirus. We must start immediately.
We dont yet know the full ramifications of the novel coronavirus. But three crucial facts have become clear in the first months of this extraordinary global event. And what they add up to is not an invocation to stay calm, as so many politicians around the globe are incessantly suggesting; it is, on the contrary, the case for changing our behavior in radical waysright now.
The first fact is that, at least in the initial stages, documented cases of COVID-19 seem to increase in exponential fashion. On the 23rd of January, Chinas Hubei province, which contains the city of Wuhan, had 444 confirmed COVID-19 cases. A week later, by the 30th of January, it had 4,903 cases. Another week later, by the 6th of February, it had 22,112.
The same story is now playing out in other countries around the world. Italy had 62 identified cases of COVID-19 on the 22nd of February. It had 888 cases by the 29th of February, and 4,636 by the 6th of March.
Because the United States has been extremely sluggish in testing patients for the coronavirus, the official tally of 604 likely represents a fraction of the real case load. But even if we take this number at face value, it suggests that we should prepare to have up to 10 times as many cases a week from today, and up to 100 times as many cases two weeks from today.
</snip>
Aristus
(66,328 posts)I just sent a request to the Medical Director for coronavirus testing kits.
safeinOhio
(32,674 posts)to you guys out.
Dennis Donovan
(18,770 posts)I'm glad NYS is taking steps in New Rochelle to mitigate addl spread of the virus.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)I am one of the lucky ones who can.
MarcA
(2,195 posts)including businesses, government offices and schools. Not everything in these
can be done online.
Dennis Donovan
(18,770 posts)Govt offices could close since most of their services are online.
Higher education institutions are stepping up with transitioning to online and teleclassroom capabilities.
Despite all of this, it's going to be disruptive, unfortunately. Staying home isn't an option for anyone in the service industry, except call centers, etc.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,337 posts)tblue37
(65,340 posts)so that won't happen.
Aristus
(66,328 posts)Masks, gowns, gloves, goggles, face shields. We're okay there.
tblue37
(65,340 posts)coti
(4,612 posts)I think we need to consider exactly how far we're willing to take shutting our society down because of this virus.
Dennis Donovan
(18,770 posts)...and we'd better be prepared to make tough decisions shortly (as in the next week).
coti
(4,612 posts)is that the majority of the people in the world, over the following months/year or two, are going to be exposed to this virus, and there's nothing that can be done to stop that. It's gone past the tipping point of being controllable.
Dennis Donovan
(18,770 posts)Yes, this is aggressive and extremely contagious, and will likely strike us all. But we don't want it happening all at once because it will cripple the health care system in the US.
tblue37
(65,340 posts)Pacifist Patriot
(24,653 posts)Last edited Tue Mar 10, 2020, 08:05 PM - Edit history (1)
Think in terms of beds. If we can get patients treated and released before the next patient comes in, we're fine. If we have three new patients admitted before someone gets released, we're screwed. Now extrapolate that to everything needed to care for critical patients.
No, it can't be stopped. But social distancing can slow it down.
coti
(4,612 posts)the protocol/standards used, the impact isolating measures will have on quality of life and the long-term economy, and how long such measures should be employed.
There is a definite balance to be struck or we risk doing more damage in our response than the virus itself will do. "Cancel everything" is not the approach I would take.
Tumbulu
(6,278 posts)but the 10% that require hospitalization and ventilation, then there are only so many beds and so many ventilators. The idea is to slow the spread so that the 10% get treated and live. If they cannot be treated, they die. So, as it spreads all over the globe, if the spread is slowed down there will be a better chance that those requiring hospitalization will survive.
That is the reason we all must stop going to crowded places and events. As much as possible.
Ms. Toad
(34,069 posts)If it is not slowed, we will run out of hospital beds, the equipment needed for long-term intubation, and medical personnel by mid to late May.
If we slow it, there will be resources to go around because those who need it will be spread out over time. Search flattening the curve.
BadGimp
(4,015 posts)The global economic downturn we will see if this really scales is hard to fathom. But it will be severly painful and highly disruptive.
we can do it
(12,184 posts)JudyM
(29,236 posts)Based on the epidemiology we have seen in other countries, we are in it now. We are unable to control it now, we can only try to mitigate it by social distancing, respiratory hygiene and hand washing, etc.
Pantagruel
(2,580 posts)"The first fact is that, at least in the initial stages, documented cases of COVID-19 seem to increase in exponential fashion. "
accounts for the jump in documentation. Shutting down everything may be overreaction. JMHO.
Dennis Donovan
(18,770 posts)I'm going to follow their advice.
Pantagruel
(2,580 posts)but "the case for changing our behavior in radical waysright now." this could be seen as shutting down everything in its ultimate form. I submit, the consequences of the "cure" may be worse than the disease. Massive job losses could trigger health care loss, jumps in crime/ mental health etc.-all with tragic consequences that could outstrip coronavirus losses.
Frankly,it may already be baked in the economic cake.
CaptYossarian
(6,448 posts)Wouldn't that be a shame?
And it turns out that a ridiculous wall wouldn't have saved 'Murikkka' after all.
Goodbye, Donnie. It was fun watching your liddle 4-year hissy fit make you the worst president in history.
Now disappear like a more intelligent Dan Quayle did.
MarcA
(2,195 posts)No need to kill the village in order to save it.
Duppers
(28,120 posts)And vulnerable people.
Here's how " in Singapore, for example, the government quickly canceled public events and
installed medical stations to measure the body temperature of passersby while private companies handed out free hand sanitizer.
As a result, the number of cases has grown much more slowly than in nearby countries.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/03/coronavirus-cancel-everything/607675/
Simple things such as taking temperatures and supplying and using hand sanitizer saves lives. Anyone with a fever should be tested and quarantined. These policies should be required.
world wide wally
(21,742 posts)If the number of victims doubles every three days, how long do we have once half the population is infected?
In the immortal words of John Cameron Swayze, "We are never more than 4 days from total anarchy"
coti
(4,612 posts)assuming doubling every 3 days.
world wide wally
(21,742 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,146 posts)Diet? Genetics? Heredity? I'm thinking olive oil and cheeses, two things not so prevalent in China. I'm thinking genetics, perhaps Asians have had ancestors of this disease for centuries but it's new to caucasian populations.
As for the suggestions in the article - playing sporting events to an empty stadium? All well and good, but what about the athletes? They're breathing on each other.
Dennis Donovan
(18,770 posts)I think I'm basing that on the one Fellini movie I've ever seen, though.
Pacifist Patriot
(24,653 posts)Japan has the highest.
It could possibly be that simple. Mortality rates vary by demographic. Overall mortality rate is only part of the picture.
For example SARS mortality rate for people under 24 was 0%.
You have to evaluate by demographic, and even that has degrees of uncertainty and overlap. Demographics can be categorized infinite ways.
Add in the low testing rates and the fact that we are in the midst of an unfolding fluid event rather than having the benefit of post-event hindsight full data analysis.
In other words, we don't know shit yet.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)I think the average age of the cases there was 81.
I have to admit that I thought they were a pretty healthy people, especially compared to us. Diet, red wine...all of that.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)But their medical system is completely overwhelmed, so they are not getting treatment they need, and so after making it to the ripe old age, covid is killing them.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Tragically so.
Damn. And still the fucker fiddles.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)But before all this horror started, I decided to get a part time job with our county. And did, with no problem.
So every day that Im scheduled to work (usually two or three), I go in to help with these vulnerable senior adults, and also the developmentally disabled.
Ill be going in to do so until they say we cant. So far, our county is free of cases. Im not stupid enough to think the virus isnt already here.
But social distancing is easier said than done.