Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 02:52 PM Sep 2012

Israel Could Send Iran ‘Back To The Stone Age’ With Electromagnetic Bomb

srael could destroy Iran’s electric network with a specially designed electromagnetic bomb in the event of a military conflict between the countries, The Sunday Times reported on Sunday.

An electromagnetic bomb of this sort would be detonated above the ground, creating an electromagnetic pulse that would “disrupt all the technological devices working on the ground,” an American expert was quoted as saying to the London paper.

The use of the new technology by Israel was brought up in discussions regarding a possible attack on Tehran’s nuclear facilities, the report claimed. Such a move would send Iran “back to the stone age,” the British paper said.

This kind of bomb would operate based on the nonlethal technology of gamma rays, the report explained. The outburst of energy would “fry” electric devices and currents around the source of the explosion.

MORE...

http://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-could-destroy-irans-electric-network/

44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Israel Could Send Iran ‘Back To The Stone Age’ With Electromagnetic Bomb (Original Post) Purveyor Sep 2012 OP
Would that be considered a weapon of mass destruction? A war crime? Comrade Grumpy Sep 2012 #1
Indeed, it would. longship Sep 2012 #3
Nukes do generate an EMP pulse, but lots of other things do too bhikkhu Sep 2012 #5
What kook would want to start a nuclear war? longship Sep 2012 #15
A large EMP would fry everything Warpy Sep 2012 #31
The U.S. did test in the 1960s. Several bombs were exploded in near space... GreenStormCloud Sep 2012 #44
At high altitude no people would be directly killed, but lots of equipment destroyed. GreenStormCloud Sep 2012 #43
Does Israel have no regard for other human beings? nt nanabugg Sep 2012 #2
Cute euphemism for a neutron bomb; a nuclear weapon Xipe Totec Sep 2012 #4
Are all EMP devices nuclear in nature? GreenPartyVoter Sep 2012 #23
Not all Confusious Sep 2012 #32
Thanks! That would be one irritated city block! GreenPartyVoter Sep 2012 #34
So it's OK for Israel to use Nukes Progressive dog Sep 2012 #6
I laughed at that too Confusious Sep 2012 #35
Oh good grief. COULD! aquart Sep 2012 #7
Right. I'm guessing the Times of Israel isn't as anti-Semitic as you think they are. DisgustipatedinCA Sep 2012 #9
Actually, it and many of its readers would fall under a standard rubric of antisemitism. Scootaloo Sep 2012 #17
What you describe doesn't some like anti-semitism to me. Comrade Grumpy Sep 2012 #33
I love to read Science Fiction in the news paper nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #8
The EMP of the Starfish Prime nuclear test Bosonic Sep 2012 #10
Critical words, NUCLEAR TEST nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #19
That was 1962 - they can't do that sort of thing anymore bhikkhu Sep 2012 #27
This electromagnetic pulse, so I've read, is the reason the USSR stayed with tubes instead of going byeya Sep 2012 #11
I remember the old joke about the USSR proudly announcing it had created... Comrade Grumpy Sep 2012 #13
Tubes are more or less immune to EMP hifiguy Sep 2012 #16
Thanks for the post. It's reassuring to know that I remembered something correctly. byeya Sep 2012 #18
Do you mean the.. lexx21 Sep 2012 #24
That's the tube hifiguy Sep 2012 #36
I agree lexx21 Sep 2012 #40
Since the USA has 30 or more military bases on either side of Iran, wouldn't our byeya Sep 2012 #12
Nonlethal gamma radiation displays similar cytoplasmic rearrangements as 12(S)-HETE. GeorgeGist Sep 2012 #14
Iran could do the same in return... JackRiddler Sep 2012 #20
And here is where the science fiction comes in nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #22
"non-lethal gama rays"..... lexx21 Sep 2012 #21
A little research brings up significant problems with EMP bombs - bhikkhu Sep 2012 #25
Wasn't this a James Bond movie? Initech Sep 2012 #26
Or a TV series? Indpndnt Sep 2012 #28
Yuo, and that one makes zero sense as well nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #29
You would have to rack up the dead and dying in all the hospitals. Most life support devices 2on2u Sep 2012 #30
still purveying this bullshit, eh? cali Sep 2012 #37
And I will continue to post 'this ridiculous speculation' as long as this shit keeps coming out of Purveyor Sep 2012 #38
But this did not "come out of Israel" did it? hack89 Sep 2012 #42
Unbelievable Marrah_G Sep 2012 #39
i always wanted sort of an emp gun i could mount on my car dembotoz Sep 2012 #41

bhikkhu

(10,718 posts)
5. Nukes do generate an EMP pulse, but lots of other things do too
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 03:09 PM
Sep 2012

Last edited Sun Sep 9, 2012, 04:43 PM - Edit history (1)

...like the coil in a car's ignition system. The problem is the energy needed to do it on a large scale - which would probably have to be a nuke.

In any case, field testing a device like that is impossible, so whether it would work as designed is questionable, and how it would work across a large and varied terrain would be extremely speculative.

I'm prone to think that a peremptory strike by Israel involving at least one nuke, especially if its effectiveness is very much in doubt, would be extremely unlikely.

ed - sp.

longship

(40,416 posts)
15. What kook would want to start a nuclear war?
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 03:39 PM
Sep 2012

That would be madness.

Re: no field testing
What I would worry about is that the damned thing would have effects far beyond projections and that it would take out more than Iran's technology.

Also, even if it wasn't a nuke, it still is likely to escalate. This is a weapon of mass destruction.

Isreal is fucking nuts if they are even considering it. IMHO, this is mere saber rattling, albeit of a very worrisome kind.

Warpy

(111,267 posts)
31. A large EMP would fry everything
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 05:20 PM
Sep 2012

including the electronics of planes in the air and lifesaving equipment in hospitals. It doesn't discriminate the way Gort did in "The Day the Earth Stood Still."

Multiple countries with planes in the air in the Near East would sustain losses. If Israel used such a weapon, it would be an international pariah immediately. Even the US would find it hard to support them since very likely a lot of US citizens would also be killed.

The military already knows what EMPs do. An atomic burst 250 miles above the Earth knocked out the Telstar satellite in the early 60s. They didn't see that coming then. They do now.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
44. The U.S. did test in the 1960s. Several bombs were exploded in near space...
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 01:44 PM
Sep 2012

...to test the EMP. Although one was exploded in the South Pacific, it lit up the night sky with an aurora in Hawaii, 800 miles away.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
43. At high altitude no people would be directly killed, but lots of equipment destroyed.
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 01:36 PM
Sep 2012

In general, old 1950s technology would be fairly safe as would modern gear that is shielded but most modern electronics would be fried. Lots of folks would die when electronics controlling machinery (Automotive ignitions systems for example) suddenly failed. The targeted country's electrical distribution system would suffer sudden failure and would be very difficult to restore. Telephone systems would totally crash.

Shipboard electronics would be largely safe, except for those that are connected to an outside antenna, because the metal ship would protect them.

Any modern society is almost completely dependent upon modern chip based electronics and if all of those in a country were to be cooked instantly then that country would be knocked back to pre-stone age.

In America, the Amish would be prepared, except that desperate people would descend upon them and take what they have.

Xipe Totec

(43,890 posts)
4. Cute euphemism for a neutron bomb; a nuclear weapon
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 02:59 PM
Sep 2012

Is Israel ready to admit they have nuclear weapons now?

Confusious

(8,317 posts)
32. Not all
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 05:22 PM
Sep 2012

For the size of EMP they are talking about, it would have to be nuclear.

"We could send a city block of Tehran back to the stone age" is the best they could do with other means.

Progressive dog

(6,904 posts)
6. So it's OK for Israel to use Nukes
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 03:12 PM
Sep 2012

Non lethal technology of gamma rays, huh. Electronics can be protected from this on non mobile targets. So they would be knocking out electrical systems, telephones, and civilian infrastructure. Cool move, let's go to war.

Confusious

(8,317 posts)
35. I laughed at that too
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 05:26 PM
Sep 2012

"Non lethal technology of gamma rays."

The WORST form of external radiation. VERY lethal.

aquart

(69,014 posts)
7. Oh good grief. COULD!
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 03:13 PM
Sep 2012

Total asshole SPECULATION.

But you know those evil Jews, just waiting for the chance to be branded monsters.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
17. Actually, it and many of its readers would fall under a standard rubric of antisemitism.
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 03:52 PM
Sep 2012

Times of Israel generally equates "Jews" and "Israel." If you say something about Israel, then you're saying it about all Jews, according to this line of thought (but not the other demographics of Israel. weird, huh?) This also carries with it the belief that Israel defines Jews around the world, as if the Knesset were the mouthpiece for the several million men and women of the faith who have nothing to do with Israel whatsoever.

The Times also falls back on the old canard of disowning Jews who don't share its views on Israel - the old "Self-hating Jew" stereotype. I'm sure you could find no shortage of articles and editorials that go out of their way to decry Jewish people as nazis, or judenrat, kapos, the list goes on, for their lack of "support for Israel."

And this is without taking into account the recycling of the age-old antisemitic stereotypes, and applying them to Arabs and Muslims in general.

it's just that the Times of Israel can "get away with it" because they wave a little blue-and-white flag and scream about how awesome Israel is. it confuses people. But the truth is, they aren't pro-Israel any more than they are pro-Jewish. it just provides an easy cover for the varied degrees of misanthropy they display.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
33. What you describe doesn't some like anti-semitism to me.
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 05:25 PM
Sep 2012

It sounds like hyper-Zionist bullying.

And I think this story was from the Times of London and reprinted in the Times of Israel.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
8. I love to read Science Fiction in the news paper
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 03:14 PM
Sep 2012

Yup you could generate an EM Pulse... but there is a reason why this is science fiction.

Oy.

FYI, a nuke generates and EM pulse, so do a few other things, and even solar flares... But to get it to do this over the extent of the territory of Iran... look at a map.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
19. Critical words, NUCLEAR TEST
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 04:09 PM
Sep 2012

This news paper is claiming this is not a lethal device, aka not a nuclear weapon... ergo science fiction. And I love to read it in the paper

Of course this is a very right wing paper... it makes the Jerusalem Post look moderate, even lefty.

bhikkhu

(10,718 posts)
27. That was 1962 - they can't do that sort of thing anymore
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 05:09 PM
Sep 2012

because of all the satellites in low earth orbit (120-1200 miles), as well as the International Space Station and the Hubble.

EMP's are inherently spherical, and a similar test nowadays would likely cause a great deal of unintended damage "up there".

 

byeya

(2,842 posts)
11. This electromagnetic pulse, so I've read, is the reason the USSR stayed with tubes instead of going
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 03:32 PM
Sep 2012

to transistors because the former are less likely to fail from such a pulse.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
13. I remember the old joke about the USSR proudly announcing it had created...
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 03:37 PM
Sep 2012

...the world's largest transistor.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
16. Tubes are more or less immune to EMP
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 03:43 PM
Sep 2012

I know an audio designer who began his career as a scientist in the USSR designing missile guidance systems. The Soviets used tubes in most of their aeronautical and avionics applications for that very reason. His most exotic amps use a tube that was a mainstay of Soviet avionics.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
36. That's the tube
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 05:29 PM
Sep 2012

and Vladimir Lamm is a genuine genius.

The 6H30 - another Soviet military tube to begin with - is a world standard for small-signal tubes, too.

lexx21

(321 posts)
40. I agree
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 07:59 PM
Sep 2012

As I am writing this I am building a 6sn7 preamp to drive some 6550 tubes (pp) that I picked up this week. I would send you a pm but du says that I don't have enough posts to be able to do that.

 

byeya

(2,842 posts)
12. Since the USA has 30 or more military bases on either side of Iran, wouldn't our
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 03:34 PM
Sep 2012

bases be affected by such an ill advised attack?

GeorgeGist

(25,321 posts)
14. Nonlethal gamma radiation displays similar cytoplasmic rearrangements as 12(S)-HETE.
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 03:37 PM
Sep 2012

Sounds delightful.


.. one end of elongated microfilaments bundles became associated with the plasma membrane while the other end of the bundles became associated with perinuclear mass protrusions. By 5 min, prominent by 15 min, protrusions, now separated from the leading edge by mixture of bundle and ring microfilaments, reached the plasma membrane to form cellular processes. By 30 min, some cytoplasmic masses showed signs of retraction along with the disappearance of their associated mixed microfilaments. As well as numerous vesicles of unknown origin, primarily associated with microtubules perpendicular to the plasma membrane, mitochondria and endoplasmic reticular cisternae were found in the cytoplasmic masses. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9547643

 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
20. Iran could do the same in return...
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 04:13 PM
Sep 2012

Not necessarily by one magic country-covering bomb but the technology for making such devices is widespread.

Talk about Pandora's box!

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
22. And here is where the science fiction comes in
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 04:29 PM
Sep 2012

the devices exist, they are really small, hardly covering a whole city block, let alone a whole country.

lexx21

(321 posts)
21. "non-lethal gama rays".....
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 04:29 PM
Sep 2012

I seriously think not. Gama radiation is the most destructive and energetic part of the electromagnetic spectrum.



bhikkhu

(10,718 posts)
25. A little research brings up significant problems with EMP bombs -
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 05:04 PM
Sep 2012

First, to get a large enough EMP pulse to damage a large target area, you have to have a very powerful pulse generator - basically a nuke is the only way to go, unless its a bunch of small targets. If you look a the size of Iran, and the complexity of the infrastructure, even a very large number of small devices would be unlikely to produce the effect described.

So you have nukes - how many do you need? The answer is still "quite a few". One of the problems of the EMP pulse is that it is inherently spherical. Satellites in low earth orbit (including the International Space Station and Hubble) are as low as 100 miles up, so any EMP would have to have a radius much smaller than that to avoid causing unintentional damage up there. Which means, more or less, one nuke per city if "sending them all back to the stone age" is the plan.

I don't think Israel has enough nukes, though they could scale back to hit only the major cities. But even there you have the problem of actually nuking population centers...I don't doubt that the military could plan it (we've have plans to conquer Canada on paper here!), and that it could even be advocated at a certain level, but I don't see it happening except as a "final solution" as a last resort. As a peremptory move, very unlikely.

Indpndnt

(2,391 posts)
28. Or a TV series?
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 05:09 PM
Sep 2012

Isn't it starting this fall? Where all power in the US is off and everyone is searching for the one man who can turn it back on?

 

2on2u

(1,843 posts)
30. You would have to rack up the dead and dying in all the hospitals. Most life support devices
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 05:17 PM
Sep 2012

and medical equipment would certainly "cease to function".

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
37. still purveying this bullshit, eh?
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 05:32 PM
Sep 2012

This is ridiculous speculation. You've been posting that Israel will imminently attack Israel for years and years here. Hasn't happened yet.

 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
38. And I will continue to post 'this ridiculous speculation' as long as this shit keeps coming out of
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 06:58 PM
Sep 2012

israel and until 'they' shut the fuck up.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
42. But this did not "come out of Israel" did it?
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 08:38 PM
Sep 2012

it came from the fevered imagination of Bill Getz. Not a single Israeli is mentioned in the article.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
39. Unbelievable
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 07:01 PM
Sep 2012

Fucking disgusting that they would even consider doing something that would harm so many innocent people.

dembotoz

(16,806 posts)
41. i always wanted sort of an emp gun i could mount on my car
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 08:17 PM
Sep 2012

some republican in a big suv cuts me off???

turn the cars electronics in th charcoal

yes i could have fun with that

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Israel Could Send Iran ‘B...