Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNot the Time for Half-Measures': Progressives Demand Far-Reaching Economic.....
Not the Time for Half-Measures': Progressives Demand Far-Reaching Economic and Public Health Assistance as Coronavirus Spreads
From the article:
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) announced the Families First Coronavirus Response Act late Wednesday, after 13 public interest groups including Public Citizen and Healthcare for America Now called for far-reaching assistance for workers and families as opposed to the Trump administration's proposal to cut payroll taxes.
The plan includes free coronavirus testing for all who need it, including uninsured people; 14 days of emergency paid sick leave for all workers; strengthened nutritional assistance including SNAP benefits and school meals; and increased federal funds for Medicaid.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) called the Democrats' proposal an "ideological wish list" and "off-base."
The plan includes free coronavirus testing for all who need it, including uninsured people; 14 days of emergency paid sick leave for all workers; strengthened nutritional assistance including SNAP benefits and school meals; and increased federal funds for Medicaid.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) called the Democrats' proposal an "ideological wish list" and "off-base."
To read more:
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/03/12/not-time-half-measures-progressives-demand-far-reaching-economic-and-public-health?cd-origin=rss&utm_term=AO&utm_campaign=Daily%20Newsletter&utm_content=email&utm_source=Daily%20Newsletter&utm_medium=Email
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 463 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Not the Time for Half-Measures': Progressives Demand Far-Reaching Economic..... (Original Post)
guillaumeb
Mar 2020
OP
Pelosi didn't introduce the bill because she was pressured into doing so by progressive groups.
TwilightZone
Mar 2020
#1
TwilightZone
(25,468 posts)1. Pelosi didn't introduce the bill because she was pressured into doing so by progressive groups.
That assertion is ludicrous.
But then, it's Common Dreams. Spin is pretty much their reason for existence.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)2. Also from the article:
Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) on Wednesday introduced a key provision of the bill, the Maintaining Essential Access to Lunch for Students (MEALS) Act, which would allow the USDA to approve state waiver requests for meal distribution which result in increased costs to the federal government.
My habit is to print the actual title from things that I post.
But it is good to note that the GOP, as ever, stands firmly against the public welfare.
TwilightZone
(25,468 posts)3. My point was that CD's inferences are nonsense.
That undermines their credibility. If they'd just left the spin out of it, it would have been more useful and accurate.
Instead, they had to throw the same silly bias into it that they do into everything else.