General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNo, COVID-19 Coronavirus Was Not Bioengineered. Here's The Research That Debunks That Idea
https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2020/03/17/covid-19-coronavirus-did-not-come-from-a-lab-study-shows-natural-origins/#593bd0803728Dont you just love conspiracy theories? Especially when two groups of people have pretty much the same conspiracy theory about each other? Some folks including politicians in the U.S. and China have both suggested that the COVID-19 coronavirus (SARS-CoV2) thats causing the pandemic may actually be a bioweapon that was manufactured in a lab. The only difference between their conspiracy theories is whos being accused of doing the manufacturing.
On the one corner are some people in the U.S. who are hinting or in some cases openly claiming that China put together this virus. For example, look at what Senator Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas) tweeted out back on January 30:
Link to tweet
Then, Steve Mosher wrote on February 22 an opinion piece for the New York Post entitled, Dont buy Chinas story: The coronavirus may have leaked from a lab. Take a wild guess at what Mosher wrote about in his piece. By the way, Mosher is not a biomedical scientist, but instead is the president of the Population Research Institute and author of book called Bully of Asia: Why Chinas Dream Is the New Threat to World Order. So chances are that he didnt love China in the first place. But who knows, love works in mysterious ways.
So what evidence have Cotton, Mosher, and others provided to support these suggestions or claims? Incriminating pictures? Suspicious emails? Some awkward selfies? Any kind of scientific evidence?
snip
John Fante
(3,479 posts)There is no getting through to them.
Celerity
(43,344 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)finding out it is just a card game means all the card game players are unknowing parts of the conspiracy - "this is bigger than all of you!"
ansible
(1,718 posts)The infection rate of this virus is incredible, it's the perfect bioweapon
intrepidity
(7,294 posts)Another really, really, REALLY good reason to avoid infection, is to deny the virus the opportunity to replicate billions of copies, which will include millions of mutations, mutations that will include an even worse, more deadly version. The longer this virus is unchecked in the wild, the more likely it will mutated to a worse version.
kurtcagle
(1,602 posts)Viruses usually tend to mutate into forms that allow for greatest replication. Killing the host tends to work in nature because animals eating other animals is common. Modern humans don't leave corpses to spread disease, so killing the host is counterproductive. Over time Covid19 will mutate into something that isn't as lethal, and humans will build up a resistance.
ansible
(1,718 posts)Spanish flu wasn't even that deadly at first, it was after it mutated into a deadlier strain that it started killing millions.
intrepidity
(7,294 posts)for example
LakeArenal
(28,817 posts)Because I would not put it past any awful country might do it.
rockfordfile
(8,702 posts)Rstrstx
(1,399 posts)I stumbled onto an article tonight saying that the British government now cannot rule out the possibility that the virus is naturally occurring but may have been released from a lab in Wuhan, probably inadvertently. The story is starting to spread beyond the usual tinfoil conspiracy sites, though I see no record of it on Fox. Can anyone point to some rebuttals to this argument?
To add to the conspiracy element this paper was supposedly set to publish in February before being pulled:
https://img-prod.tgcom24.mediaset.it/images/2020/02/16/114720192-5eb8307f-017c-4075-a697-348628da0204.pdf
If Judge Jeanine sobers up enough to get wind of this the shrill will be unbearable.