Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums1 Million people have been tested for COVID-19
Get the champagne out. Let's celebrate that milestone.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 717 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
1 Million people have been tested for COVID-19 (Original Post)
ProudMNDemocrat
Mar 2020
OP
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)1. Watching these shit shows just helps his "ratings".
I will wait until he is done to hear what nonsense he spilled today.
Squinch
(50,949 posts)2. Bullshit.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)3. Lies...
JHB
(37,159 posts)4. Worldwide?
procon
(15,805 posts)5. Where did he get that number?
Seriously, if he's gonna lie, you'd think with all his experience he'd be better at it.
Igel
(35,300 posts)7. Covid tracking project's about there.
https://covidtracking.com/data/
And they point to two limitations in their data:
--not all testing locations report negatives
--not all testing locations report results
Then there's any lag between tests and results.
Saying that the 65k is crucial when we know this is a lower bound with the error increasing gradually for a few weeks (and so simply rounding down can only increase the error) seems petty.
And they point to two limitations in their data:
--not all testing locations report negatives
--not all testing locations report results
Then there's any lag between tests and results.
Saying that the 65k is crucial when we know this is a lower bound with the error increasing gradually for a few weeks (and so simply rounding down can only increase the error) seems petty.
sinkingfeeling
(51,454 posts)6. Only, what, 330 million to go?
Glimmer of Hope
(5,823 posts)8. It is too late.