Tue Mar 31, 2020, 01:34 PM
Progressive Jones (6,011 posts)
Will fertilized eggs receive the $500.00 payments? The GOP says these are "people".
I want to hear the GOP go on record saying that fertilized eggs are
not eligible for the payments, as they are not really people. Failing to do that, I believe that every fertilized egg has a check coming.
|
11 replies, 971 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Progressive Jones | Mar 2020 | OP |
Brainfodder | Mar 2020 | #1 | |
BumRushDaShow | Mar 2020 | #2 | |
SheltieLover | Mar 2020 | #3 | |
LaMouffette | Mar 2020 | #4 | |
coti | Mar 2020 | #5 | |
mathematic | Mar 2020 | #6 | |
at140 | Mar 2020 | #7 | |
FBaggins | Mar 2020 | #8 | |
IggleDuer | Mar 2020 | #9 | |
slater71 | Mar 2020 | #10 | |
Newest Reality | Mar 2020 | #11 |
Response to Progressive Jones (Original post)
Tue Mar 31, 2020, 01:36 PM
Brainfodder (5,456 posts)
1. Clever angle, I like it!
![]() |
Response to Progressive Jones (Original post)
Tue Mar 31, 2020, 01:36 PM
BumRushDaShow (107,681 posts)
2. Excellent question
and if there are multiples, there should be $500 each.
![]() |
Response to Progressive Jones (Original post)
Tue Mar 31, 2020, 01:44 PM
SheltieLover (54,087 posts)
3. But, but, but
I can just hear it now. 🤮
|
Response to Progressive Jones (Original post)
Tue Mar 31, 2020, 01:45 PM
LaMouffette (1,636 posts)
4. Per Citizens United, . . .
corporations are people, too. I would not be surprised to see corporations clawing for their $1,200 checks to individual Americans, on top of their $50 billion dollar bailouts.
|
Response to Progressive Jones (Original post)
Tue Mar 31, 2020, 01:46 PM
coti (4,612 posts)
5. Fertilized? Why so stingy?
I've got millions of sperm each owed a check, as far as I'm concerned. And I'm their payee.
|
Response to Progressive Jones (Original post)
Tue Mar 31, 2020, 01:48 PM
mathematic (1,263 posts)
6. Conservatives would gladly pay $500 per fetus to outlaw abortion n/t
Response to Progressive Jones (Original post)
Tue Mar 31, 2020, 01:48 PM
at140 (6,023 posts)
7. I know what repugs will reply to that...
they don't have a social security number!
|
Response to at140 (Reply #7)
Tue Mar 31, 2020, 01:57 PM
FBaggins (25,474 posts)
8. Which is actually the correct answer
A beneficiary child has to have an SSN for the child tax credit... and the current legislation is modeled on that.
Which will cause some problems for college students and others who are dependents on someone else’s taxes but are over 17. No check |
Response to Progressive Jones (Original post)
Tue Mar 31, 2020, 02:01 PM
IggleDuer (922 posts)
9. If a woman gets pregnant in one year...
... and delivers in the next, are the parents eligible for a Family deduction for Both years?
|
Response to Progressive Jones (Original post)
Tue Mar 31, 2020, 02:22 PM
slater71 (1,147 posts)
10. Yes. I believe you are correct . All people living should be able to
Be able to receive social security payments nine months before we received them. Also, people will be able to drive nine months before there driving age. Drink a beer nine months sooner. Go to school nine months sooner and graduate sooner. Vote sooner. Own a gun sooner. Feel free to add to this. I will take my nine months of social security checks now, please.
|
Response to Progressive Jones (Original post)
Tue Mar 31, 2020, 02:30 PM
Newest Reality (12,712 posts)
11. Yes...
That's a good question.
If I had some fertilized eggs stashed away in the freezer, could I apply for $500 for each of them as a primary caregiver? Are there any thawing requirements involved? Just a GO-Pee hypothetical ![]() |