Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDavid Ignatius: The U.S. needs to know what went wrong
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/after-the-pandemic-subsides-the-us-must-learn-from-its-mistakes/2020/03/31/99a37368-7387-11ea-87da-77a8136c1a6d_story.html
By David Ignatius
Columnist
March 31, 2020 at 6:43 p.m. EDT
When America has recovered from the coronavirus crisis and people are back to work, Rep. Adam B. Schiff thinks Congress should consider a 9/11-style independent commission to examine why the nation was so unprepared for the pandemic.
Schiff, a California Democrat, told me in an interview Monday that his staff has already started working on a discussion draft modeled after the 9/11 Commission, and that he would be talking about the possibility with others in Congress. And he said the House Intelligence Committee, which he chairs, has begun reviewing the committees intelligence materials on the pandemic.
We will need to delay the work of the commission until the crisis has abated to ensure that it does not interfere with the agencies that are leading the response, Schiff explained in an email. But that should not prevent us from beginning to identify where we got it wrong and how we can be prepared for the next pandemic.
A review of the Trump administrations performance would find many negatives but also some pluses. President Trumps public statements appeared to minimize the virus and its impact until recently. But the National Security Council staff, led by deputy Matthew Pottinger, a Chinese-speaking former Wall Street Journal correspondent in Beijing, was aggressive. The first interagency meeting on the Wuhan outbreak took place Jan. 14, and the first NSC deputies committee meeting on Jan. 27, according to a senior administration official.
What accounts for the failure to translate this concern into action? One explosive issue in any inquiry would be whether Trump discounted intelligence warnings because of concerns about the impact of the virus on his reelection campaign. Indeed, the question implicates a broader set of concerns among Schiff and other critics about what they see as the politicization of intelligence, in particular Trumps firing in February of Joseph Maguire and Andrew P. Hallman, the acting director of national intelligence and his deputy, respectively, and then the replacement of the top two officials at the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC).
Career officials fear that Richard Grenell, the acting DNI, is trying to shape intelligence that might challenge or embarrass Trump. Grenell is a professional press spokesman, said one senior retired intelligence officer, referring to Grenells stint as U.S. press spokesman at the United Nations during the George W. Bush administration. Over the next six months, Trump wants someone [as DNI] who has his back.
</snip>
By David Ignatius
Columnist
March 31, 2020 at 6:43 p.m. EDT
When America has recovered from the coronavirus crisis and people are back to work, Rep. Adam B. Schiff thinks Congress should consider a 9/11-style independent commission to examine why the nation was so unprepared for the pandemic.
Schiff, a California Democrat, told me in an interview Monday that his staff has already started working on a discussion draft modeled after the 9/11 Commission, and that he would be talking about the possibility with others in Congress. And he said the House Intelligence Committee, which he chairs, has begun reviewing the committees intelligence materials on the pandemic.
We will need to delay the work of the commission until the crisis has abated to ensure that it does not interfere with the agencies that are leading the response, Schiff explained in an email. But that should not prevent us from beginning to identify where we got it wrong and how we can be prepared for the next pandemic.
A review of the Trump administrations performance would find many negatives but also some pluses. President Trumps public statements appeared to minimize the virus and its impact until recently. But the National Security Council staff, led by deputy Matthew Pottinger, a Chinese-speaking former Wall Street Journal correspondent in Beijing, was aggressive. The first interagency meeting on the Wuhan outbreak took place Jan. 14, and the first NSC deputies committee meeting on Jan. 27, according to a senior administration official.
What accounts for the failure to translate this concern into action? One explosive issue in any inquiry would be whether Trump discounted intelligence warnings because of concerns about the impact of the virus on his reelection campaign. Indeed, the question implicates a broader set of concerns among Schiff and other critics about what they see as the politicization of intelligence, in particular Trumps firing in February of Joseph Maguire and Andrew P. Hallman, the acting director of national intelligence and his deputy, respectively, and then the replacement of the top two officials at the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC).
Career officials fear that Richard Grenell, the acting DNI, is trying to shape intelligence that might challenge or embarrass Trump. Grenell is a professional press spokesman, said one senior retired intelligence officer, referring to Grenells stint as U.S. press spokesman at the United Nations during the George W. Bush administration. Over the next six months, Trump wants someone [as DNI] who has his back.
</snip>
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 822 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
David Ignatius: The U.S. needs to know what went wrong (Original Post)
Dennis Donovan
Apr 2020
OP
pat_k
(9,313 posts)1. Wishes coming true
Dennis Donovan
(18,770 posts)2. Have you seen this website?
pat_k
(9,313 posts)3. No. New site to me. Need to poke around.
Thanks for the pointer. No, I haven't see that site.
Their peak hospital resource requirements (with shelter in place) appear to be later than the dates projected by Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington.
https://covid19.healthdata.org/projections
I need to poke around more to see if I can get a better understanding of the different models, I know IHME is focused on the first wave (immediate needs). Perhaps that factors into the differences.
DeminPennswoods
(15,286 posts)4. At least they put their model data and assumptions
out there for all to see.