Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
55 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Okay, so . . . forget the Chicago teachers for a moment. Would you support PATCO? (Original Post) Stinky The Clown Sep 2012 OP
Absolutely Sherman A1 Sep 2012 #1
It doesn't exist anymore, but yes. eqfan592 Sep 2012 #2
Ask yourself this question... GEOpix Sep 2012 #3
Ask yoursef this question... Stinky The Clown Sep 2012 #5
Mitt Romney, but... GEOpix Sep 2012 #9
walesa didn't become a conservative *after* -- word is, he always was in league with the HiPointDem Sep 2012 #39
Good point GEOpix Sep 2012 #47
Hope you enjoy your stay. abumbyanyothername Sep 2012 #8
Ask yourself this question...I'll answer it for you. GEOpix Sep 2012 #12
YES! I was 10 years old and I remember my dad, a member of the UTU, talking about how all neverforget Sep 2012 #4
You Betcha! TexasProgresive Sep 2012 #6
Born and raised in CWA family abumbyanyothername Sep 2012 #10
Yes, knowing how other unions went to ruin after PATCO was attacked. no_hypocrisy Sep 2012 #7
MN duggie99 Sep 2012 #11
I remember a PATCO member sitting in my living room with others ... FLyellowdog Sep 2012 #14
PATCO duggie99 Sep 2012 #54
I'm glad things worked out well for you. FLyellowdog Sep 2012 #55
Welcome to DU. hay rick Sep 2012 #15
Yes I did. n/t Autumn Sep 2012 #13
I would and I did. Lifelong Protester Sep 2012 #16
I did. I used to play cards regularly with a ATC. Ikonoklast Sep 2012 #17
Nope. boppers Sep 2012 #18
+1 badtoworse Sep 2012 #22
+2 emilyg Sep 2012 #23
FDR was wrong on this issue. eqfan592 Sep 2012 #26
+1 Starry Messenger Sep 2012 #28
The employees in the public sector are not working for a for-profit company. boppers Sep 2012 #35
It makes literally no difference whatsoever. eqfan592 Sep 2012 #36
Are you arguing for less protections, then? boppers Sep 2012 #38
I'd say public sector workers deserve the exact same rights to strike as private workers. backscatter712 Sep 2012 #41
Planes crashing into each other seems like a public safety issue to me. boppers Sep 2012 #48
When most of the ATCs are striking, most of the planes won't be in the air at all. backscatter712 Sep 2012 #51
+2! If public-sector workers can't strike, how do they fight back against exploitation? backscatter712 Sep 2012 #44
Would you have supported the Flint sit-down strike of 1937? backscatter712 Sep 2012 #31
WELL SAID! (nt) eqfan592 Sep 2012 #34
The Flint workers were government workers? I hadn't realized that. boppers Sep 2012 #37
I agree that FDR was wrong on this issue. backscatter712 Sep 2012 #45
PATCO wasn't showing up for work, though. boppers Sep 2012 #49
But like I said, without air traffic controllers, the planes don't fly, they just sit on the tarmac. backscatter712 Sep 2012 #52
I did. But then I'm an egghead commie elitist, always worried about consequences. n/t Egalitarian Thug Sep 2012 #19
PATCO (along with the Teamsters and ALPA) endorsed Reagan, a past union leader, running pro-union. boppers Sep 2012 #20
I did. cordelia Sep 2012 #21
I did, and it is too bad that our Democratic Congresscritters Lydia Leftcoast Sep 2012 #24
Of course. MrSlayer Sep 2012 #25
Yes. nt Comrade_McKenzie Sep 2012 #27
Anyone who's been here at DU for a long enough time can figure out who won't. backscatter712 Sep 2012 #29
Assange is a peacock. Occupy, meh. Robb Sep 2012 #42
Hell YES! burrowowl Sep 2012 #30
Oh, yes. SheilaT Sep 2012 #32
He was thinking he hated black people. Robb Sep 2012 #43
yes, I'd support both CreekDog Sep 2012 #33
I supported PATCO' Dannyteague Sep 2012 #40
How about the Postal Workers who went on wildcat strikes in 1970? Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2012 #46
Yup but then I'm pro-labor not a corporate bootlicking asshole of a Turd Wayer TheKentuckian Sep 2012 #50
Union through and through. NEVER mgmnt over a union!! WinkyDink Sep 2012 #53

GEOpix

(65 posts)
3. Ask yourself this question...
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 09:07 PM
Sep 2012

Why did Ronald Reagan bust the Professional Air Traffic Controllers Union, but embrace the Polish Solidarity labor union???

GEOpix

(65 posts)
9. Mitt Romney, but...
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 09:18 PM
Sep 2012

...the Solidarity labor union came out solidly against Mitt Romney. Walesa became a paid off conservative after he left the union and went into politics; whereas, the workers still have only their labor to bargain for, and they see Romney for the exploiter of labor that he is.

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
39. walesa didn't become a conservative *after* -- word is, he always was in league with the
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 07:37 AM
Sep 2012

catholic church & other conservative forces, including the reagan admin.

GEOpix

(65 posts)
12. Ask yourself this question...I'll answer it for you.
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 09:28 PM
Sep 2012

Reagan used the Solidarity labor union as pawns in the Cold War to face off against the Jaruzelski communist regime in order to play brinksmanship with the Soviet Union.

neverforget

(9,436 posts)
4. YES! I was 10 years old and I remember my dad, a member of the UTU, talking about how all
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 09:09 PM
Sep 2012

Reagan was trying to do was bust the unions. It was true then and it's true now.

abumbyanyothername

(2,711 posts)
10. Born and raised in CWA family
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 09:18 PM
Sep 2012

And I was either Teamster or IAFF when he fired PATCO.

Worst move ever made by a US Pres until W invaded Iraq.

duggie99

(40 posts)
11. MN
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 09:18 PM
Sep 2012

I was a member of PATCO and lost my job. I was the first woman air traffic controller at an airport in Cailfornia. I was able to pursue another career as I was young enough. I still support unions!!! By the way 3 years after the strike and losing my job they called me back. I did decline

FLyellowdog

(4,276 posts)
14. I remember a PATCO member sitting in my living room with others ...
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 09:45 PM
Sep 2012

all the while talking about how the union should remain strong...controllers should go out on strike...yada yada yada. Then after he walked out, and was fired, he sued claiming he was coerced into striking...which was a lie because he was coercing others. Guess, what? He won his job back WITH backpay. Go figure.

I know people who walked out but when the president ordered them back to work, they went and remained good controllers for years to come. They worked 10 hour days 6 days a week to keep the planes flying. Those I know who lost their jobs said later that it was the best decision they'd ever made. Different strokes for different folks. Understand that once a controller leaves the FAA there are very few, if any, jobs in the same or similar field. They all had to look for a different profession, and most seem happy that they did. Just my observation.

duggie99

(40 posts)
54. PATCO
Mon Sep 17, 2012, 10:29 PM
Sep 2012

You are certainly right about no job that equated to being a Controller in the real world. Lucky for me I had other options and because of the extensive training I had equipped me with skills that I did not get in College. For that I'm thankful and my husband tells everyone I was fired by the number one man.(The President)

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
17. I did. I used to play cards regularly with a ATC.
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 10:02 PM
Sep 2012

Worked Oberlin Center, lost his job.

Ed said it was the best thing that ever happened to him; he was tired of being treated like shit.

boppers

(16,588 posts)
18. Nope.
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 10:03 PM
Sep 2012

I also would not support our Congressmen going on strike.

Nor would I support our military going on strike.

I'm with FDR on this one.
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=15445

'Particularly, I want to emphasize my conviction that militant tactics have no place in the functions of any organization of Government employees. Upon employees in the Federal service rests the obligation to serve the whole people, whose interests and welfare require orderliness and continuity in the conduct of Government activities. This obligation is paramount. Since their own services have to do with the functioning of the Government, a strike of public employees manifests nothing less than an intent on their part to prevent or obstruct the operations of Government until their demands are satisfied. Such action, looking toward the paralysis of Government by those who have sworn to support it, is unthinkable and intolerable. It is, therefore, with a feeling of gratification that I have noted in the constitution of the National Federation of Federal Employees the provision that "under no circumstances shall this Federation engage in or support strikes against the United 'States Government."'

eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
26. FDR was wrong on this issue.
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 12:07 AM
Sep 2012

As are you. You would deny the employees of the US government the same rights as those of public sector employees, with such shockingly and staggeringly poor justification that it literally boggles the mind (as it should have when FDR said it).

Sorry, but shame on you.

boppers

(16,588 posts)
35. The employees in the public sector are not working for a for-profit company.
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 02:45 AM
Sep 2012

You know how it's kind of insane to try to run the government like a business? Same principle applies.

It's not like some greedy capitalist owner is raking in all the profits, and not sharing with the workers, or is giving fat dividend checks out to investors while workers starve.



eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
36. It makes literally no difference whatsoever.
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 02:49 AM
Sep 2012

Public sector employees can have their rights trampled and working conditions reduced to abhorrent levels just as easily by a government bureaucracy as they can by a public sector business. Given that, public sector employees deserve the exact same protection and support as private sector employees.

Sorry, but your entire line of reasoning is a major fail.

boppers

(16,588 posts)
38. Are you arguing for less protections, then?
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 03:42 AM
Sep 2012

"public sector employees deserve the exact same protection and support as private sector employees"

Which in most places, is none.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
41. I'd say public sector workers deserve the exact same rights to strike as private workers.
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 11:45 AM
Sep 2012

The only exemption is when public safety is at risk.

With PATCO, flights got delayed. Too bad.

With the teachers, the kids got to stay home. Inconvenient, but not life-endangering.

Nurse's strikes and other strikes by public safety workers typically account for this sort of thing - with enough of the members of the strikers coming to work, under the endorsement of the striking union, to account for emergencies and situations where lives are at stake.

What you're demanding is that people working for the government forfeit their rights, and forfeit one of the few ways they have for fighting for their rights.

Fuck. That.

boppers

(16,588 posts)
48. Planes crashing into each other seems like a public safety issue to me.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:06 PM
Sep 2012

It is a hard line to draw, though.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
51. When most of the ATCs are striking, most of the planes won't be in the air at all.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 10:38 PM
Sep 2012

Which means you'll have a bunch of pissed off passengers stranded at various airports, but no crashes - the FAA won't let planes fly if controllers aren't available to manage the airspace - they'll just sit on the tarmac.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
31. Would you have supported the Flint sit-down strike of 1937?
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 12:43 AM
Sep 2012

Oh no, they were breaking the law! Why, they had to face down law enforcement, Pinkertons and the National Guard. They fended off cops by throwing car parts like big bolts at them and directing fire-hoses at them. Wait, that's violence! Better call off the union movement!

They even had a Fight To The Death Committee for when they tried to storm the factory.

But oh no, we can't have that! Why, our objections to our fuckings by the elites need to be civilized. We can't go around violating norms! Why we can't have anyone striking against the government! Somehow, that's different from striking against a corporation, because we all know our government is just and would never exploit its workers. Why, you could write a letter to your Congressman. After taking millions of dollars from big business, I'm sure he's very interested in your opinion.

boppers

(16,588 posts)
37. The Flint workers were government workers? I hadn't realized that.
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 03:36 AM
Sep 2012

Maybe because it's not true. There's no comparison.

Would you be in favor of the members of the US Congress going on strike for a pay raise? How about the Generals at the Pentagon? Maybe soldiers/sailors/(etc.) could go on strike for less hazardous working conditions?

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
45. I agree that FDR was wrong on this issue.
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 12:02 PM
Sep 2012

The only limitation in the right to strike should be in cases where public safety would be put at risk. That's why police are generally not allowed to strike. In situations like nurse's strikes, the nurses still show up for work, and they're more than happy to treat emergency cases, but they'll stop working when it's time for elective procedures.

boppers

(16,588 posts)
49. PATCO wasn't showing up for work, though.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:08 PM
Sep 2012

It was a "sick-out" tactic.

Not quite the same as "showing up, but only handling public safety issues".

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
52. But like I said, without air traffic controllers, the planes don't fly, they just sit on the tarmac.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 10:40 PM
Sep 2012

Where's the giant public safety problem?

boppers

(16,588 posts)
20. PATCO (along with the Teamsters and ALPA) endorsed Reagan, a past union leader, running pro-union.
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 10:11 PM
Sep 2012

History can be a very quixotic thing at times.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
29. Anyone who's been here at DU for a long enough time can figure out who won't.
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 12:35 AM
Sep 2012

They're not hard to suss out.

They're the same ones who refused to support Occupy, who refuse to support Julian Assange.

The same group of assholes who come out, bringing along a gaggle of sockpuppets. It's pretty obvious.

Robb

(39,665 posts)
42. Assange is a peacock. Occupy, meh.
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 11:52 AM
Sep 2012

And I'm one of the biggest union supporters on DU.

Perhaps your pigeon-holer is out of calibration.

burrowowl

(17,645 posts)
30. Hell YES!
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 12:41 AM
Sep 2012

It wasn't for wages, it was for SAFETY!


My Father and Sister were Air Traffic controllers!

God Damn Raygun!

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
32. Oh, yes.
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 02:06 AM
Sep 2012

I worked at Washington National Airport for ten years starting in 1969. It was horrifying to watch how the Air Traffic Controllers who worked there aged so rapidly.

I will never forgive Lane Kirkland of the AFL-CIO standing with Reagan in the firing of the air traffic controllers. That, more than anything else, was the clear death knell of the unions. What in God's name could he have been thinking?

Robb

(39,665 posts)
43. He was thinking he hated black people.
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 11:54 AM
Sep 2012

Kind of all there was to it. Not the Teamsters' finest hour.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
33. yes, I'd support both
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 02:09 AM
Sep 2012

in fact, i'm so sick of the attitude that people negotiating the best deal in terms of pay for themselves is wrong when it's a teacher or air traffic controller, but when it's some other profession, at a much higher rate of pay --then it's all good.



part of me hopes that the children of today repay us our unkindness and selfishness when we get old, after all, they are being shortchanged so that the wealthiest among us can pay less in taxes.

 

Dannyteague

(51 posts)
40. I supported PATCO'
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 07:45 AM
Sep 2012

What that entire deal was, Reagan giving a wink and a nod to corporate America that union Busting was ok in his book

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Okay, so . . . forget the...