General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOkay, so . . . forget the Chicago teachers for a moment. Would you support PATCO?
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)I did support PATCO.
eqfan592
(5,963 posts)NATCA is the new controllers union.
GEOpix
(65 posts)Why did Ronald Reagan bust the Professional Air Traffic Controllers Union, but embrace the Polish Solidarity labor union???
Stinky The Clown
(67,818 posts)Who did Lech Walesa endorse in this US election cycle?
GEOpix
(65 posts)...the Solidarity labor union came out solidly against Mitt Romney. Walesa became a paid off conservative after he left the union and went into politics; whereas, the workers still have only their labor to bargain for, and they see Romney for the exploiter of labor that he is.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)catholic church & other conservative forces, including the reagan admin.
GEOpix
(65 posts)and entirely correct.
abumbyanyothername
(2,711 posts)But to answer your question . . . because he is a bumbling asshole?
GEOpix
(65 posts)Reagan used the Solidarity labor union as pawns in the Cold War to face off against the Jaruzelski communist regime in order to play brinksmanship with the Soviet Union.
neverforget
(9,436 posts)Reagan was trying to do was bust the unions. It was true then and it's true now.
TexasProgresive
(12,158 posts)I supported them and was angry and sad at what Raygun did.
abumbyanyothername
(2,711 posts)And I was either Teamster or IAFF when he fired PATCO.
Worst move ever made by a US Pres until W invaded Iraq.
no_hypocrisy
(46,182 posts)duggie99
(40 posts)I was a member of PATCO and lost my job. I was the first woman air traffic controller at an airport in Cailfornia. I was able to pursue another career as I was young enough. I still support unions!!! By the way 3 years after the strike and losing my job they called me back. I did decline
FLyellowdog
(4,276 posts)all the while talking about how the union should remain strong...controllers should go out on strike...yada yada yada. Then after he walked out, and was fired, he sued claiming he was coerced into striking...which was a lie because he was coercing others. Guess, what? He won his job back WITH backpay. Go figure.
I know people who walked out but when the president ordered them back to work, they went and remained good controllers for years to come. They worked 10 hour days 6 days a week to keep the planes flying. Those I know who lost their jobs said later that it was the best decision they'd ever made. Different strokes for different folks. Understand that once a controller leaves the FAA there are very few, if any, jobs in the same or similar field. They all had to look for a different profession, and most seem happy that they did. Just my observation.
You are certainly right about no job that equated to being a Controller in the real world. Lucky for me I had other options and because of the extensive training I had equipped me with skills that I did not get in College. For that I'm thankful and my husband tells everyone I was fired by the number one man.(The President)
FLyellowdog
(4,276 posts)Welcome to DU.
hay rick
(7,639 posts)A union booster- double welcome!
Autumn
(45,120 posts)Lifelong Protester
(8,421 posts)I have worked for the FAA.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)Worked Oberlin Center, lost his job.
Ed said it was the best thing that ever happened to him; he was tired of being treated like shit.
boppers
(16,588 posts)I also would not support our Congressmen going on strike.
Nor would I support our military going on strike.
I'm with FDR on this one.
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=15445
'Particularly, I want to emphasize my conviction that militant tactics have no place in the functions of any organization of Government employees. Upon employees in the Federal service rests the obligation to serve the whole people, whose interests and welfare require orderliness and continuity in the conduct of Government activities. This obligation is paramount. Since their own services have to do with the functioning of the Government, a strike of public employees manifests nothing less than an intent on their part to prevent or obstruct the operations of Government until their demands are satisfied. Such action, looking toward the paralysis of Government by those who have sworn to support it, is unthinkable and intolerable. It is, therefore, with a feeling of gratification that I have noted in the constitution of the National Federation of Federal Employees the provision that "under no circumstances shall this Federation engage in or support strikes against the United 'States Government."'
eqfan592
(5,963 posts)As are you. You would deny the employees of the US government the same rights as those of public sector employees, with such shockingly and staggeringly poor justification that it literally boggles the mind (as it should have when FDR said it).
Sorry, but shame on you.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)boppers
(16,588 posts)You know how it's kind of insane to try to run the government like a business? Same principle applies.
It's not like some greedy capitalist owner is raking in all the profits, and not sharing with the workers, or is giving fat dividend checks out to investors while workers starve.
eqfan592
(5,963 posts)Public sector employees can have their rights trampled and working conditions reduced to abhorrent levels just as easily by a government bureaucracy as they can by a public sector business. Given that, public sector employees deserve the exact same protection and support as private sector employees.
Sorry, but your entire line of reasoning is a major fail.
boppers
(16,588 posts)"public sector employees deserve the exact same protection and support as private sector employees"
Which in most places, is none.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)The only exemption is when public safety is at risk.
With PATCO, flights got delayed. Too bad.
With the teachers, the kids got to stay home. Inconvenient, but not life-endangering.
Nurse's strikes and other strikes by public safety workers typically account for this sort of thing - with enough of the members of the strikers coming to work, under the endorsement of the striking union, to account for emergencies and situations where lives are at stake.
What you're demanding is that people working for the government forfeit their rights, and forfeit one of the few ways they have for fighting for their rights.
Fuck. That.
boppers
(16,588 posts)It is a hard line to draw, though.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Which means you'll have a bunch of pissed off passengers stranded at various airports, but no crashes - the FAA won't let planes fly if controllers aren't available to manage the airspace - they'll just sit on the tarmac.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Oh no, they were breaking the law! Why, they had to face down law enforcement, Pinkertons and the National Guard. They fended off cops by throwing car parts like big bolts at them and directing fire-hoses at them. Wait, that's violence! Better call off the union movement!
They even had a Fight To The Death Committee for when they tried to storm the factory.
But oh no, we can't have that! Why, our objections to our fuckings by the elites need to be civilized. We can't go around violating norms! Why we can't have anyone striking against the government! Somehow, that's different from striking against a corporation, because we all know our government is just and would never exploit its workers. Why, you could write a letter to your Congressman. After taking millions of dollars from big business, I'm sure he's very interested in your opinion.
eqfan592
(5,963 posts)boppers
(16,588 posts)Maybe because it's not true. There's no comparison.
Would you be in favor of the members of the US Congress going on strike for a pay raise? How about the Generals at the Pentagon? Maybe soldiers/sailors/(etc.) could go on strike for less hazardous working conditions?
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)The only limitation in the right to strike should be in cases where public safety would be put at risk. That's why police are generally not allowed to strike. In situations like nurse's strikes, the nurses still show up for work, and they're more than happy to treat emergency cases, but they'll stop working when it's time for elective procedures.
boppers
(16,588 posts)It was a "sick-out" tactic.
Not quite the same as "showing up, but only handling public safety issues".
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Where's the giant public safety problem?
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)boppers
(16,588 posts)History can be a very quixotic thing at times.
cordelia
(2,174 posts)And would again.
Lydia Leftcoast
(48,217 posts)didn't.
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)United we bargain, divided we beg.
A slogan that never goes out of date.
Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)backscatter712
(26,355 posts)They're not hard to suss out.
They're the same ones who refused to support Occupy, who refuse to support Julian Assange.
The same group of assholes who come out, bringing along a gaggle of sockpuppets. It's pretty obvious.
Robb
(39,665 posts)And I'm one of the biggest union supporters on DU.
Perhaps your pigeon-holer is out of calibration.
burrowowl
(17,645 posts)It wasn't for wages, it was for SAFETY!
My Father and Sister were Air Traffic controllers!
God Damn Raygun!
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)I worked at Washington National Airport for ten years starting in 1969. It was horrifying to watch how the Air Traffic Controllers who worked there aged so rapidly.
I will never forgive Lane Kirkland of the AFL-CIO standing with Reagan in the firing of the air traffic controllers. That, more than anything else, was the clear death knell of the unions. What in God's name could he have been thinking?
Robb
(39,665 posts)Kind of all there was to it. Not the Teamsters' finest hour.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)in fact, i'm so sick of the attitude that people negotiating the best deal in terms of pay for themselves is wrong when it's a teacher or air traffic controller, but when it's some other profession, at a much higher rate of pay --then it's all good.
part of me hopes that the children of today repay us our unkindness and selfishness when we get old, after all, they are being shortchanged so that the wealthiest among us can pay less in taxes.
Dannyteague
(51 posts)What that entire deal was, Reagan giving a wink and a nod to corporate America that union Busting was ok in his book
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)I was one of them. And, we won after Nixon caved.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._postal_strike_of_1970