General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMatt Taibbi has left Rolling Stone and gone independent.
Taibbi has ebbed as a favorite at DU. IMO Taibbi is one of the few investigative journalists.
Announcement to Readers: I'm Moving
Substack is now my full-time job.
From now on, my online writing will be published on Substack. This is my full-time job now.
I first started writing for Rolling Stone in 2003 and will continue a relationship with my good friends there, contributing print features and also maintaining the Useful Idiots podcast with Katie Halper. I love Rolling Stone and have been proud to represent the magazine over the years. If anyone cares to know, I wasnt asked to leave.
Ive been thinking about this for some time. Having had experience with Substack Ive serialized two books here in the last few years, including Hate Inc. I believe the path for independent journalists is in a subscriber-based model.
more at: https://taibbi.substack.com/p/announcement-to-readers-im-moving
msongs
(67,405 posts)Tommy_Carcetti
(43,181 posts)Much like Robert Parry became "independent"?
PufPuf23
(8,774 posts)Thank you in advance.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,181 posts)Worked for the AP and Newsweek, won a Polk Award for his stories on Iran-Contra.
Somewhere in between 1990 and 2014--not sure exactly when--something happened.
He left Newsweek, opened up his own outfit called Consortium News.
In 2014, he began running stories falsely categorizing the mass Ukrainian demonstrations against their autocratic leader Victor Yanukovych as a Western sponsored coup (echoing the Kremlin line), and subsequently defended the Russian invasion and annexation of Crimea. When Russian sponsored militants shot down Malaysian Air Flight 17 over Eastern Ukraine in the Summer of 2014, Parry openly speculated that it was actually the Ukrainian military who shot down the plane because he claims they mistook it for Vladimir Putin's presidential airplane.
Parry continued to frequently parrot Russian state media propaganda lines up until his death in 2018.
My guess is that he somehow became compromised at some point down the line by the Russian government, and spent the last years of his life helping to disseminate their disinformation to gullible Westerners, including many people here at DU.
PufPuf23
(8,774 posts)and did not know Parry RIP nor the connection with Consortium News (that cannot recall last time I read).
My partaking of Parry pretty much follows over time his regard and attention at DU.
IMO to state compromised is too often a negative spin on difference of perspective. It is good to have more than one perspective to consider.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,181 posts)...was only considering the perspective of the Russian government above all others.
And he was repeating claims from them that were quite easily debunkable as complete nonsense. The MH17 conspiracy theory being a prime example. No right minded person actually believed that.
JHB
(37,160 posts)...but I do recall thinking "All he's doing is undermining his earlier work."
Indykatie
(3,696 posts)snowybirdie
(5,227 posts)but in recent years, he's gone further left. Haven't like his positions. Too radical for me. Good luck!
texasleo
(11,298 posts)UTUSN
(70,686 posts)✌🏼
50 Shades Of Blue
(9,989 posts)sloopy
(1 post)good riddance
ismnotwasm
(41,977 posts)Probably for the best
HarlanPepper
(2,042 posts)Or maybe RT with a daily show?
PufPuf23
(8,774 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Truth serves the liberal Democratic Party far, FAR better than it does the illiberal left and today's right.
Notably, extremism, on the rise in this dangerous era across the spectrum, requires dishonesty to exist. Truth always goes mainstream, and those indulging or supporting extremism must reject and defeat mainstream thinking, whatever it is.
Stevegberg
(80 posts)?
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)burrowowl
(17,641 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)and something very different, whether extremist or other orientations, is easily identified by abandonment of honesty. When someone must support his position with lies and attacks, as Taibbi too often does, he's a toxic political agent for something that should not be supported.
There really is a strong connection between truth and right, truth and good, truth and understanding. And between deceit and betrayal.
In contrast, Thomas Jefferson is often pointed to as radical, and he unquestionably was for that age. But he was always honest and honorable, and so respected by a broad spectrum of his peers that leaders in both Virginia's 250-year-old, wealthy elite colonial government and the revolutionaries forming a national government repeatedly pleaded for him to work with them.
Taibbi is no Jefferson, and we know from his writings that Jefferson would have nothing to do with him. If Taibbi's divorcing himself from whatever editorial control Rolling Stone had over him, it's not going to be for the good.
demmiblue
(36,846 posts)after reading about his time in Russia.
Dem4Life1102
(3,974 posts)Never trusted or liked him. Too damn smug.
UTUSN
(70,686 posts)PufPuf23
(8,774 posts)UTUSN
(70,686 posts)DarthDem
(5,255 posts)It certainly should have been, anyway.
rufus dog
(8,419 posts)grantcart
(53,061 posts)sweetloukillbot
(11,011 posts)Hes one of those who aligned somewhat when criticizing Bush, but then was equally critical of Obama abs showed his true colors.
Kinda like Greenwald.