Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Chicagogrl1

(418 posts) Fri Apr 10, 2020, 04:54 PM Apr 2020

Why why why

Does the press ask tRump questions?? it is a waste of time. He lies, lies, lies! Why doesn't the press simply ask medical questions that can only be answered by the experts? I know that would make the orange clown angry, but it would cut him off @ the knees! Maybe the pressers would be shorter & more truthful! Again, i just wish the press would band together to defeat this ugly orange tyrant!!!

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why why why (Original Post) Chicagogrl1 Apr 2020 OP

They are as feckless as he is sometimes. Bev54 Apr 2020 #1

I don't watch it Chicagogrl1 Apr 2020 #2

Asking actual relevant questions might make Trump angry. guillaumeb Apr 2020 #3

Bev54

(10,051 posts)

1. They are as feckless as he is sometimes.

Reply to Chicagogrl1 (Original post)

Fri Apr 10, 2020, 04:59 PM

Apr 2020

Everybody raves about Jim Acosta, he does not really challenge Trump with facts at all. I am wondering if CNN made a deal to change the time of the briefing and they would air it. I am sick to death of these assholes putting any of his shit on the air. I wish to hell people would just stop watching it.

Chicagogrl1

(418 posts)

2. I don't watch it

Reply to Bev54 (Reply #1)

Fri Apr 10, 2020, 05:08 PM

Apr 2020

It makes me physically ill.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)

3. Asking actual relevant questions might make Trump angry.

Reply to Chicagogrl1 (Original post)

Fri Apr 10, 2020, 05:34 PM

Apr 2020

And the reporter, or more accurately, the transcriber, would not be allowed in to the rallies.

Reply to this discussion