General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMontanaMama
(23,313 posts)Oz showed us who he is by saying what he said AND talking to Hannity.
hlthe2b
(102,236 posts)Takket
(21,563 posts)Call them by accident.
This guy was openly advocating for a Holocaust with our children to be the first victims.
we are WAY WAY past apologies.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)targetpractice
(4,919 posts)"Sorry Oz, once you put the we can lose three percent of the school children on the table for debate you take yourself out of the solutions business. I have to ask, . Those eyebrows are sculpted ? Does he ask for the Ming the Merciless look at the salon?"
Link to tweet
question everything
(47,476 posts)jrthin
(4,835 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)bad use of a word or something. It told us his view of humanity.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)Link to tweet
?s=21
greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)Goonch
(3,607 posts)Butterflylady
(3,543 posts)Confused my a**. He knew dam well what he was saying would go over big with magas.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)mokawanis
(4,440 posts)but you're right in recognizing that your comments upset people.
Mariana
(14,856 posts)I think he meant the deaths of 2-3% of the entire population would be acceptable to him, with the school children being vectors to infect everyone else.
solara
(3,836 posts)That is a completely obscene idea. Whether or not they are children, they are still PEOPLE.. human beings with lives and souls and loved ones, and dreams and goals .. We cannot, absolutely must not normalize any part of the cold & heartless willingness of the #trumpCult to allow a few hundred thousand deaths to make the economy strong again.
How callous and mean spirited of "Dr" Oz.. 0% is the only acceptable percentage of deaths from this debacle.
Mariana
(14,856 posts)It sure sounded to me like he meant it's just dandy if 2-3% of Americans die. Other people think he meant 2-3% of school children dying is acceptable to him. He says he meant neither. But if he's so pathetically bad at expressing himself, such that almost everyone "misunderstood" him, then he shouldn't be running his gob in front of a TV camera, about anything, ever.
solara
(3,836 posts)tblue37
(65,340 posts)honest.abe
(8,678 posts)If he only had a brain!
Blue Owl
(50,356 posts)n/t
Bantamfancier
(366 posts)I was sure he was just kidding.
What an asshole.
Bradshaw3
(7,517 posts)Idiots both. Thanks Oprah.
EarthFirst
(2,900 posts)You are injecting opinion into your diagnosis of the solutions to the problems.
Solly Mack
(90,764 posts)It wasn't what he said that caused the problem - per his recent comment - it's that you were confused by what he said. It was that confusion that caused you to be upset. Not him.
Shitheels always claim they misspoke when they say something contemptible and get called on it.
Response to brooklynite (Original post)
elocs This message was self-deleted by its author.
Gothmog
(145,168 posts)ooky
(8,922 posts)I have zero interest in the RW opinions of either of you.
Caliman73
(11,736 posts)I am of the ilk that did not take Oz's statement to mean that he was okay with 2%-3% of children dying. It was clear that he was saying that according to whatever stats he was looking at, opening the schools would add 2%-3% to the total death rate, so a death rate of 100,000 people would be augmented to 2,000 to 3,000 more. THAT is HORRIFIC enough for me, plus, that is probably a bullshit projection. The infection rate is not 1:1, if kids are allowed to go to school before we have massive testing, tracing, and isolation, then we would be looking at our kids potentially going out, picking up the virus, and spreading it back at home. The infection rate would not remain low.
Whatever Oz is today, at one point he was a medical doctor. He took an oath to "do no harm". He obviously abandoned that oath some time ago when he began pushing stupid remedies on his show and sold his authority for profit. This statement was callous and just wrong, and he did it either for ideology, for profit, or for notoriety. It is disgusting and there should be a heavy price to pay.
MFGsunny
(2,356 posts)You knew EXACTLY where in TV land you were. AND, you knew exactly the bidding you were doing to an audience of ONE.
Maybe we can edit that old SNL line :: "__________, you ignorant slut."