General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCan we have Threads with context please?
Many of the threads I have started in the past, have sunk like stones. This one will likely do so as well. I am just venting and I see that there are others who have shared my frustration.
I tend to be verbose in many of my threads and responses. I like to try to get my point across clearly. Maybe too wordy...who knows?
I am wondering, What causes people to post subject lines that are provocative or excited but then there is nothing explaining the context or any information about what is going on?
I will give a hypothetical example:
"Man, they have really done it now!!!" - Followed by no words in the body of the thread. No who "They" are and no "what" this "they" have done now.
Maybe just a couple of words to explain? "Man, they have really done it now!!!" - I was watching the view and they said that Trump really is the offspring of a human and orangutan. We can't have human orangutan hybrids running the US!
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Did you see that?
Cirque du So-What
(26,025 posts)Grasswire2
(13,571 posts)THIS!
JudyM
(29,294 posts)Pluvious
(4,332 posts)Thank you for posting this resonable request Grassy
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,946 posts)Caliman73
(11,760 posts)...
Cha
(297,929 posts)tv so it would so be helpful.. if they want more to join in.
Amaryllis
(9,526 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,064 posts)Mister Ed
(5,945 posts)Response to Mister Ed (Reply #21)
sl8 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Amaryllis
(9,526 posts)Alacritous Crier
(3,822 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Amaryllis
(9,526 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,946 posts)but it seems to fall on deaf computers or whatever the metaphor should be. I wish there was a category for alerting on these posts.
Amaryllis
(9,526 posts)LakeArenal
(28,863 posts)Sometimes links wont come up.
It really is annoying.
CrispyQ
(36,552 posts)Post title: OMG! Can you believe this?
Post content: A link with zero explanation where it goes & what it's about.
It's rude. Or lazy. Or both.
Amaryllis
(9,526 posts)Martin Eden
(12,881 posts)Thoughtless and lazy.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,064 posts)Soph0571
(9,685 posts)Making sure title and context and I am forever thankful for it.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,064 posts)Soph0571
(9,685 posts)Amaryllis
(9,526 posts)msongs
(67,477 posts)Caliman73
(11,760 posts)That is a good point. I don't do twitter so I wouldn't really know. It would be neat if someone could do a quick look at threads before Twitter became super popular and see if they were more context laden.
I do however remember emails (from way back in the day) with FWD:FWD:FWD: that were pretty crap too.
I don't think we need to do full on paragraphs, but just a little bit of information as to what the point of the thread is.
greyl
(22,990 posts)"Keith just tore that guy a new one." end of post
"Don Lemon, lol." end of post
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)If I wanted to be on Twit, I'd have a Twit account. I am here because I am socially distant from Twit and Falsebook. Very, very distant.
klook
(12,173 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Amaryllis
(9,526 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)It's very annoying! Or threads that assume everyone is watching television and the same exact program that they are.
"I can't believe Rachel said that!" n/t
Caliman73
(11,760 posts)"I can't believe Rachel said that Trump is a blood sucking vampire. You should watch her show for 4/20/2020."
Dr. Strange
(25,927 posts)scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)Dr. Strange
(25,927 posts)I wonder if anyone else can find it?
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)I found the link: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x6739759 - but it doesn't work.
I also found the probable date of the original thread - April 10, 2011 - on this page: https://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/archives.php?date=2011x4x10
You have to scroll down a ways to find the thread title, "mainly because half the people I was with believed it until I explained the situation to them" - but clicking on it doesn't work, either.
Oh well - at least we have our memories.
Mean Gene
(65 posts)That's hilarious! I don't know how I missed this thread when it happened!
Some of my favorite responses:
"Bunny. Pancake. Head. nt"
-- followed by "Baby. Mini-sandwich. Head." with this picture:
"Little boy, are you lost? Do you want me to go to the service desk and call your mommy on the loudspeaker?"
"In the end, the universe tends to unfold as it should."
and (by the OP author): "this thread sux"
Dr. Strange
(25,927 posts)Bless you. Bless your toes!
You are DU's greatest DUer this day!
Amaryllis
(9,526 posts)Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)The fun is over.
No more chicken threads.
Oscar.
I miss those old classics. I wish there was a way to make a collections of links on DU to all of them to re-read them all.
Dr. Strange
(25,927 posts)I'd love to read the kudzu thread, but apparently it went places, and no one can find it.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)It asks for your old password info, but if you just click cancel, you can still read it:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=105x4465947
demmiblue
(36,911 posts)Caliman73
(11,760 posts)This is a discussion board. We want to discuss, but we want to know what we are discussing.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)This has been going on forever.
I once asked an OP to give some more info about his post (very politely) and he pmed me calling me names. Kinda sad, because I always had liked him before.
Caliman73
(11,760 posts)Just needed to put it out there.
That is horrible that someone would lash out at being asked for more information.
I think that the anonymity of the internet sometimes brings out the worst in people.
I just want to talk, and discuss, and debate and be around people that seem sane.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)I was quite taken aback, but I learned long ago not to take anything personally that happens on the internet.
For what its worth, I appreciate your attempt at this!
Caliman73
(11,760 posts)We're still working on the name.
See posts 20 and 33 for context!
Hekate
(90,959 posts)I do a fair number of one-liners as responses to kick threads, but not as a no-content OP.
Caliman73
(11,760 posts)OPs don't need to stretch out for days, but a sense of what the discussion is would be nice.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,543 posts)I'd miss most toons if somebody didn't kick 'em when they're down. We're all ruined!
crickets
(25,989 posts)- the name of the person who got the OP riled or an explanation of the issue, along with a link or a TV channel and full name of the program if applicable. I don't watch a lot of these shows, so when somebody yells, "Mabel is really giving it to him!" that turns me off right away. Mabel who? On what channel? Which "he" is she giving it to? Even better, what exactly did she say that is so exciting? I'm as bad as the next person for calling Chris Matthews Tweety, but I've tried to stop doing that or referring to people by initials because I want people to understand what I'm talking about.
That kind of thing.
I tend to restrict the one-liners for kicking as well.
UTUSN
(70,778 posts)I have a spectrum for posts, with Erratic at one end over to Earnest at the other. The ones I spend effort, research, originality on are the ones that sink like stones. But oh if I momentarily dare to indulge being a tad misspoken, candid, whimsical, or just off-the-wall ------- the mob Flames, high handed judgments, and vulgar personal attacks will pile up with a couple of thousand Views, with those who do those things having exceedingly high self-esteem, empowerment, and conviction about being exemplars of kindness and .standards.
------------ Whups, left "solidarity" behind and got carried away!1
Caliman73
(11,760 posts)I know exactly what you are saying.
Sometimes people have seen a response and said, "That should be its own Thread". Head swollen from the compliment I research, add more context and pose what I think might be a conversation starting question....
ONE MAYBE TWO views and down the page it goes.
I don't kick my own threads so they disappear.
NBachers
(17,160 posts)about it.
Then I get something like, "I guess you're just not paying attention if you don't know!"
I'm special 'cause I know something you don't haahaa.
Thank you for being an involved part of the Context Alliance here.
Caliman73
(11,760 posts)We are the Context Alliance Posters CAP!
Amaryllis
(9,526 posts)Tom Kitten
(7,350 posts)context does make a difference
Caliman73
(11,760 posts)Ha!
Tom Kitten
(7,350 posts)Hugh from 20/20 who is now 99 in 2020! I'm so old I remember him when he hosted Concentration
(don't mean to hijack thread but a little levity now and then don't hurt)
nilram
(2,894 posts)zackymilly
(2,375 posts)MerryBlooms
(11,776 posts)Andy823
(11,495 posts)of trolls still coming here trying to rack up posts. One poster averages 100 post a day, and will hit 3,000 before they have been here for a whole month, plus
had two posts removed!
Everyone should check posters profiles you can learn a lot from them. And remember "don't feed the trolls it only makes them worse!"
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)then you would have won DU's prize for best post of the day.
Sid
Caliman73
(11,760 posts)Next time...
3Hotdogs
(12,456 posts)Patterson
(1,534 posts)NRaleighLiberal
(60,029 posts)all watching teevee. I'm used to it after 16 years here
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,925 posts)Not everyone is watching the exact same thing. Context matters a lot.
nilram
(2,894 posts)Or, Wow, I really should have posted this a long time ago. Ooookkaaaaayyyy. Why dont you tell me what its about? I rolled my eyes so hard I think I sprained them.
Caliman73
(11,760 posts)"rolled my eyes so hard I think I sprained them".
Yes! just a couple of words to tell me what you are talking about please.
I have the same conversation with my kids. "Daddy, look at that..." "Ummm can I have a general direction or description of what I am supposed to be looking at?"
Baclava
(12,047 posts)Oh dear, now I will get alerted on again, I just know it
miyazaki
(2,255 posts)Ya, this. "This" is about the most annoying one word fucking crap title ever perpetrated here. I would ban the ones who post like this for a month and flush their thread down the toilet.
Caliman73
(11,760 posts)Remember the ones with the arrow?
/
||
||
||
\___
progree
(10,930 posts)I used to when they made it to the 5 Greatest Threads section of the home page, but I don't anymore. I spend way too much time as it is trying to keep up with the news without wasting my time on these.
Caliman73
(11,760 posts)Then.... NOTHING.
I want to hear or see what was said.
progree
(10,930 posts)DTomlinson
(411 posts)DENVERPOPS
(8,883 posts)is when people, Media Included, name a Representative or Senator with out putting a "D" or "R" following the person they name the area they Represent.
Like: Joe Blow D-CO and his position: Joe Blow D-CO U.S. Senator.......
betsuni
(25,750 posts)It's like they think we're in the living room with them. Often someone will say "Ari is talking to so-and-so" and I want to see it but have to look up who Ari is, what show, when, etc.
Also annoying is when a tweet or quote is posted and instead of discussing what is said, most comments are about how everybody hates that person, or asking why we should care what that person says. Boring.
Also, I have an almost irresistible impulse leave the comment "But her emails" to almost everything.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Part of its charm. Sometimes a DUer watching TV assumes the rest of DU is watching the same thing. Kind of cute, really, as if the other DUers are there with you in the room, sitting next to you on the couch.
Caliman73
(11,760 posts)Go Away!
Kidding.... I agree, sometimes people get caught up in the moment. It is still irritating when you are just looking for what all the excitement is about and ..... NOTHING!
nilram
(2,894 posts)So those watching teevee can post away, nilly-willy. (And I could ignore the whole thing.)
bluecollar2
(3,622 posts)Crunchy Frog
(26,698 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,240 posts)ahoysrcsm
(787 posts)Just sounds like your singing into a fan to me.
Caliman73
(11,760 posts)Seriously though, they are out there. I will not be naming names or posting links, as calling other DUers out by name is against the Terms of Services. I have never had a post removed and do not want to start now.
When you see a post with a urgent headline and then little to no information about who or what is the subject, those are the threads. Just take a look at the responses to this thread. Other people seem to understand what is being discussed.
ahoysrcsm
(787 posts)ahoysrcsm
(787 posts)Might be worth the time.
Caliman73
(11,760 posts)Typically, clarification is requested in those threads and there is a lack or response, or as others posted, they receive DMs with insults. some posters tend to get defensive when asked about the lack of clarity/context in a post.
People are having a discussion, venting, and having a good time on this thread it seems, so all in all, seems like it was worth it.
Amaryllis
(9,526 posts)something or not. LIke they are just having an emotional outburst and then move on to the next one.
Amaryllis
(9,526 posts)greatest page very quickly with 294 recs.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100213204623
ONe of the respondents said the kind of posts you are referring to are equivalent to spam. They clutter up the discussion forum and a lot of posts with valuable content get lost because people are posting so fast and so many posts of the kind you describe with no context and just emotional reactions.
You are far from alone. This has been a problem since I first started coming to DU a lot of years ago.
Caliman73
(11,760 posts)I think because the news moves so fast and the idiot in the White House and his cronies and the GOP give us so much to be outraged about, there has been an uptick.
Amaryllis
(9,526 posts)Karma13612
(4,555 posts)Last edited Sat Apr 18, 2020, 08:35 AM - Edit history (1)
Besides news sites, I pretty much live on DU and another equally progressive political site.
I have never started a thread as I dont feel gifted enuf to compose something that is worthy.
Just recently I have noticed the uptick in meaningless OPs. I always thought there were guidelines as to what constituted something worthy of being an OP.
On the other progressive site, I have seen many comments criticizing an OP when it was frivolous or repetitive. The poster is asked to take down the OP. Not sure what happens if they dont.
Maybe we need to do that here?
Anyway, thanks for the OP. It really hits a nerve with me as well!
Stuart G
(38,454 posts)Buckeye_Democrat
(14,858 posts)Im so angry about that stuff!
Caliman73
(11,760 posts)I am especially troubled by that thing they said...