General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo, the allegations against Biden?
I feel that Trump is some how involved? He cant get Biden on the Ukraine debacle, so Trump resorts to drumming up allegations to hurt Biden? People are upset with Biden not defending himself? I think hes doing the right thing and not to say anything now! It would benefit Trump and give fire power against Joe?
I dont know if the allegations are true and by no means I am defending any actions involving any sexual assault allegations. Wait to what come later down road and we can judge the facts then? Remember this, Trump has had lawsuits against him for multiple sexual assault issues for many years now and look where is now?
FarPoint
(12,472 posts)No energy from me...
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,367 posts)Of course Don Jr. commented about it the other day on Twitter (look it up if you want I'm not linking to it) and was soundly bashed by those who pointed out the many allegations against his dad.
The Magistrate
(95,264 posts)Each day there are two or three such expressions of 'concern' put up here. It is getting to be an awfully old wheeze.
The only proper response is to assail, attack, and smear the person peddling the lie. Allow not the least hint of concession there could be any possibility the lie is true, and keep up the assault, being as vicious and unfair as is not just humanly, but demonically possible. Do not bother with mere denial of the charge, attack the person peddling the lie, and anyone biased and craven and sensation-seeking enough to pass the lie on, and keep on doing so no matter what.
"Can't nobody here play this game?"
"Defeat of a dangerous enemy is something to be for."
spooky3
(34,510 posts)HarlanPepper
(2,042 posts)Probably gleefully.
cmeneer
(253 posts)The woman reporter was hyping it pretty good, too!
FloridaBlues
(4,011 posts)kcr
(15,320 posts)This isn't going to be Al Franken 2.0. Totally different circumstances. Even Gillibrand isn't going for it.
Jeebo
(2,028 posts)If the allegations are not true, he's 1,000 times better. Whether Biden is 1,000 times better or merely 500 times better, it's a no-brainer, I'm voting for Biden on Nov. 3. More than ever before, I am now a yellow-dog Democrat. If the Democrats nominate a yellow dog, I'll vote for that yellow dog before I'll vote for that orange raccoon who's in the White House now.
-- Ron
HarlanPepper
(2,042 posts)Shes changed her story multiple times. She was tweeting out pro Biden stuff just 18 months ago. Then she started tweeting pro Putin shit. This is a person who is batshit crazy and needs help.
imanamerican63
(13,830 posts)crickets
(25,988 posts)Would be it helpful if someone just put together a page of links and pointed to it each time this or the "I am so concerned about the dementia rumors!" topic comes up? (In other words, to the inevitable questioning post that has started appearing every single day...)
It's going to be along five months otherwise.
eta re Tara Reade, here it is: https://www.democraticunderground.com/100213367525
RandySF
(59,547 posts)Totally dismissing the NYT reporters who dug and found nothing supporting the allegations.
imanamerican63
(13,830 posts)cmeneer
(253 posts)That he dismissed it?
Green Line
(1,123 posts)imanamerican63
(13,830 posts)Sorry for any confusion!
SharonClark
(10,014 posts)Hayes said the NYT piece did not clearly state there was no evidence against Biden.
Zoonart
(11,894 posts)So did multiple news papers of note.
badhair77
(4,224 posts)DeminPennswoods
(15,292 posts)as sexual harassment, sexual assault reporting has become his calling card.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Even if it's through an office manager who let her go and not Biden himself.
Demsrule86
(68,747 posts)does not need to play this game...she is clearly lying. And Chris Hayes should be ashamed.
Demsrule86
(68,747 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)I have gone on record questioning Tara Reade and her inconsistencies.
But things have changed. At least, this story became more difficult to dismiss when a person came forward, who records indicate was a neighbor or Tara's, stating Tara told her back in the mid-90s exactly what she's claiming now.
That's tough to overlook without finding out some more details that discredits her story. Yes, she's been inconsistent, but she's yet to be caught in an outright lie and if they could prove she left on her own accord, that would unravel any story she has.
Demsrule86
(68,747 posts)Only people who can't accept that Joe won the primary give two shits. He will be the nominee.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Demsrule86
(68,747 posts)Demsrule86
(68,747 posts)This is a Democratic website. And it is clear that for some reason, some wish to promote negative crap, (pack of lies from Ms. Reade) about our nominee.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)I was fine ignoring it when everything was on the fringes of twitter.
But now it's hit the mainstream media and as much as it'd be nice to just ignore it, ignoring it won't necessarily mean it goes away.
FloridaBlues
(4,011 posts)Doesn't seem credible
I read a piece today she has refused to go on fox several times to "tell" her story. Why not go if this is true? Some trouble makers are trying to keep this alive but now she isn't going on tv.
Thoughts?
imanamerican63
(13,830 posts)Her story has to creditable!
HarlanPepper
(2,042 posts)But because of his terrible response to the virus they are hanging on for dear life. I think she was intended to be their closer.
Demsrule86
(68,747 posts)going after our side with this shit and it has to stop. Tara Reade is not credible.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Its Biden or Trump, so its a no brained.
struggle4progress
(118,379 posts)BGBD
(3,282 posts)30 years to say somebody did something to you, you're not going to get very many people to believe you. We can argue if that's good or bad, but it is what it is. You're going to be doubted even if you have an otherwise totally believable story. Add to this that Reade is very much not credible based on her constantly changing story, purposefully timed drop, peddling of the story, and preemptive attempts to hire a PR firm just make this a story most people aren't going to buy.
People who are going to believe this story are either the far left folks that are trying to get you to vote Green or the Trump people.
Apart from all of that, I find it completely unbelievable that anyone would be brazen enough to rape someone in the hallway of the Senate AND that nobody would have seen it. The Senate is and has been one of the most secure buildings in the world. Does anyone believe that there is a square inch of that building that isn't under watch from either people or cameras?