Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CousinIT

(9,241 posts)
Mon May 11, 2020, 04:16 PM May 2020

"Monstrous": Trump is Considering Direct Payments in Exchange for Cuts to Social Security Benefits

https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/05/11/trump-administrations-monstrous-idea-direct-payments-exchange-cuts-social-security

Suddenly concerned about the growing national debt now that corporations have secured access to trillions of dollars in Covid-19 bailout funds with little oversight, Trump administration officials are reportedly considering several proposals purportedly aimed at reducing government spending—including a pair of plans that would provide Americans with cash payments in exchange for delays or cuts to their Social Security benefits.

"Social Security is an earned insurance benefit. It is not a piggy bank. This plan, and any plan that raids Social Security, is a moral abomination."
—Alex Lawson, Social Security Works


In addition to weighing a push for automatic federal spending cuts that would take effect once the economy rebounds from the coronavirus crisis, Washington Post reported Sunday that top White House economic officials are "exploring a proposal floated by two conservative scholars that would allow Americans to choose to receive checks of up to $5,000 in exchange for a delay of their Social Security benefits."

Senior administration officials have also "discussed the 'Eagle Plan,' a 29-page memo that called for an overhaul of federal retirement programs in exchange for upfront payments to some workers," according to the Post. "The proposal calls for giving Americans $10,000 upfront in exchange for curbing their federal retirement benefits, such as Social Security."

The "Eagle Plan" was crafted by a State Department official close to President Donald Trump's son-in-law and senior adviser Jared Kushner, who forwarded the proposal to the White House Council of Economic Advisers. Art Laffer, a conservative economist and Trump adviser, told the Post that he supports the proposal.




The Trump plan is not only designed to eliminate Social Security, it is also designed to eliminate Federal Retirement for Federal Employees and Military Members! Trump is determined to destroy anything that helps Working Americans, to include eliminating Medicare, Medicaid & ACA!
59 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Monstrous": Trump is Considering Direct Payments in Exchange for Cuts to Social Security Benefits (Original Post) CousinIT May 2020 OP
Misnomer! Newest Reality May 2020 #1
Fortunately edhopper May 2020 #2
And THIS is our savior!!! bluestarone May 2020 #4
He'll issue another executive A$$ order ... aggiesal May 2020 #34
Of course he knows that this will not pass the House. But that's not the point. totodeinhere May 2020 #46
And Democrats will counterattack that he was trying to make a move on Social Security. ancianita May 2020 #53
NO. spanone May 2020 #3
The House will block it. roamer65 May 2020 #5
Trump doesn't recognize.... SergeStorms May 2020 #40
If they don't relinquish power, then you can take secession to the bank. roamer65 May 2020 #56
Kick dalton99a May 2020 #6
well jeeze..it took long enough stillcool May 2020 #7
There is nothing inherantly wrong Disaffected May 2020 #8
I think one of the strengths of Social Security is that people can't borrow from their future progree May 2020 #10
Yes, good point, it could turn out badly Disaffected May 2020 #16
That's a transactional view, not strategic. lostnfound May 2020 #11
That's nice, but necessity forces most of us whathehell May 2020 #47
SS benefits can be taxed - lump sum especially. Takes you above a threshold. erronis May 2020 #26
Natasha Sarin dragonfly301 May 2020 #9
Hasn't Wharton already lost whatever prestige DeminPennswoods May 2020 #17
The Conservative Crackpots these Ivy League schools are cranking out thanks to bucolic_frolic May 2020 #19
I totally agree dragonfly301 May 2020 #22
He must be removed from office IMMEDIATELY! Why isnt everyone clamoring for this? Baclava May 2020 #12
how? Celerity May 2020 #30
Force him to resign. During Watergate, some 30 newspapers demanded Nixon to step down. Baclava May 2020 #36
That won't work in the age of Trump. Caliman73 May 2020 #39
We are no longer in 1974, the Republicans are hyper-partisan, see a kill shot, and will let Rump Celerity May 2020 #42
Nixon resigned rather than face impeachment.. whathehell May 2020 #49
Still time to try again, try the mental incompetence angle, get a Dr to declare him deranged Baclava May 2020 #51
Agree completely.. whathehell May 2020 #58
No! SheltieLover May 2020 #13
This reminds me of the ads on TV Bayard May 2020 #14
Yes, the govt wants in on the easy credit loansharking business Baclava May 2020 #57
One way or another they want to kill grandma. Vinca May 2020 #15
I think he should announce on twitter that all SS payments will be cut in half effective immediatly. Runningdawg May 2020 #18
OVER MY ROTTING CORPSE WILL HE GET HIS GREEDY LITTLE Haggis for Breakfast May 2020 #20
THIS!!!! Codifer May 2020 #32
SEMPER FORTIS !! Haggis for Breakfast May 2020 #35
10 Grand? lonely bird May 2020 #21
This is insane. nt Sloumeau May 2020 #23
FUCK OFF tRump! SammyWinstonJack May 2020 #24
Fight fire with fire Jarqui May 2020 #25
This zentrum May 2020 #29
Amen! Pull out ALL the stops. VOX May 2020 #44
Joe and Nancy better zentrum May 2020 #27
Wait a cotton picking minute! The GOP isn't cutting SS, they are RAIDING it! ffr May 2020 #28
Wasn't SocSec put in place b/c grammas, grampas were starving to death in Depression? bobbieinok May 2020 #31
Could I be able to send the money back to forego ... aggiesal May 2020 #33
I'm trying to find the actual specfics. The Mouth May 2020 #37
I would love to see a copy of the Eagle Plan. bottomofthehill May 2020 #38
Short term money for long term loss. keithbvadu2 May 2020 #41
This will be as "popular" as attempts to privatize Social Security. Person of Interest May 2020 #43
It looks like I'm screwed. abakan May 2020 #45
Any "plan" that stops current workers from paying into the fund will kill it for everyone. VOX May 2020 #48
His plan (another one) was to stop current employers from paying into it....that's a 50% cut. CousinIT May 2020 #54
Is Prince Jared practicing for his fucking dance rehearsal in the background there? Maru Kitteh May 2020 #50
Well....lets just reach down and grab that ole 3rd rail of US politics..... paleotn May 2020 #52
Dead on arrival dotard Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2020 #55
Trump's version of a Payday Loan. sarcasmo May 2020 #59

Newest Reality

(12,712 posts)
1. Misnomer!
Mon May 11, 2020, 04:19 PM
May 2020

That's..ahem.. more aptly what should be called the, Vulture Plan and it is very much in step with vulture capitalism in the wake of the disaster capitalism already in progress.

totodeinhere

(13,058 posts)
46. Of course he knows that this will not pass the House. But that's not the point.
Mon May 11, 2020, 07:03 PM
May 2020

During the fall campaign he would be able to say that the Democrats in the House blocked payments to Americans. Of course the House would have good reason for blocking it, but a lot of stupid voters will not get that far. All they will hear is that it's the Democrats' fault.

ancianita

(36,053 posts)
53. And Democrats will counterattack that he was trying to make a move on Social Security.
Mon May 11, 2020, 07:23 PM
May 2020

That is point that will stick with people and piss them off about Trump.

They should get out in front of this move right now, have a press conference to show media and the country what he is now trying to do to make a grab at Social Security. He said the word first. He's using it for leverage in his so-called 'help' to Americans. He's trying to grab this safety net.

That's the message they'll hear and remember.

Now. Before any of his rallies start.

SergeStorms

(19,201 posts)
40. Trump doesn't recognize....
Mon May 11, 2020, 06:58 PM
May 2020

the House of Representatives as part of the government, let alone a co-equal part of the government. We already have a fascist dictator in the United States. We don't have to wait any longer. I'm convinced republicans are not going to relinquish power, even if an honest and fair election were to take place. They have the country the way they want it now, do you honestly think they're going to allow everything they've done to be undone? I can't see it happening, and it makes me physically ill.

roamer65

(36,745 posts)
56. If they don't relinquish power, then you can take secession to the bank.
Mon May 11, 2020, 10:41 PM
May 2020

CA, NY and New England will go first.

stillcool

(32,626 posts)
7. well jeeze..it took long enough
Mon May 11, 2020, 04:40 PM
May 2020

is there anything left on the 'to-do' list after they kill social security?

Disaffected

(4,554 posts)
8. There is nothing inherantly wrong
Mon May 11, 2020, 04:44 PM
May 2020

with offering a cash payout, in full or in part, in return for reduced future payments from Social Security or any other pension type of plan. The crux of the matter lies in how much the payment is compared to the value of the plan (and any other terms & conditions the guv may try to throw in).

OTOH, making it mandatory along with some crappy payout amount would be quite another matter...

progree

(10,907 posts)
10. I think one of the strengths of Social Security is that people can't borrow from their future
Mon May 11, 2020, 04:57 PM
May 2020

benefits. Otherwise, human nature being what it is, too many people would be doing that and leaving themselves way short in old age. Unless there is some kind of cap on the amount that can be borrowed that keeps this problem from getting too far out of hand.

Though there is an exception: for many many years, we've had a choice to take SS benefits starting at age 62 (or age 63, or age 64... etc.) for a reduction in the monthly benefit amount. The monthly benefit amount is reduced by about 8% per year that you start taking benefits before your "full retirement age" (traditionally age 65, but it's now 66 years 2 months) . On the other end, one can delay taking Social Security beyond their full retirement age, up to age 70, and gain a 8% per year of delay higher monthly benefit amount.

Details: https://www.ssa.gov/planners/retire/retirechart.html

But while the ones taking early retirement are costing themselves in the size of the monthly benefit amount, at least it's not a lump sum. A large lump sum amount might be more irresistable than a stream of monthly income starting early. And it is being saved for old age, just starting at a maximum of 4 or 5 years early.

Disaffected

(4,554 posts)
16. Yes, good point, it could turn out badly
Mon May 11, 2020, 05:39 PM
May 2020

depending on how well the lump sum is managed - blowing it all on fast women and casinos instead of investing & prudent spending will have undesirable consequences. Not saying it's a good idea - just that it's not altogether bad.

lostnfound

(16,178 posts)
11. That's a transactional view, not strategic.
Mon May 11, 2020, 05:08 PM
May 2020

First off, I don’t pay social security tax to ensure that “I” have retirement money. I pay it so that I don’t live in a society with starving old beggars on every street corner.

Thinking of our fellow humans has fallen out of fashion, but a more civilized or advanced culture would value it in this way.

Second, if every crisis gets solved by an offset from social security, it will get destroyed in a heartbeat. Hurricane damage? Sign this. Need maternity leave? Here you go, sign here.

Turn 67, your health making it hard to work, and you want to retire? Too bad.

Strategically, the GOP dreams of destroying this program and this is a way to chip away at it.

erronis

(15,241 posts)
26. SS benefits can be taxed - lump sum especially. Takes you above a threshold.
Mon May 11, 2020, 06:13 PM
May 2020

Some states tax SS as if it is regular salaried income.

Many people need additional income to survive above their SS payments. Lumped together these can cause a dramatic increase in federal and state tax payments due.

Give someone a lump sum of say 20xmonthly payment and they'll find a tax bill of 10-30% that they didn't see before.

DeminPennswoods

(15,286 posts)
17. Hasn't Wharton already lost whatever prestige
Mon May 11, 2020, 05:40 PM
May 2020

it once had? It is like after GW Bush, I no longer respected a Harvard MBA.

bucolic_frolic

(43,155 posts)
19. The Conservative Crackpots these Ivy League schools are cranking out thanks to
Mon May 11, 2020, 05:59 PM
May 2020

the Conservative Crackpots on their faculty is outrageous. They are only there to feed the richest Americans.

 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
36. Force him to resign. During Watergate, some 30 newspapers demanded Nixon to step down.
Mon May 11, 2020, 06:38 PM
May 2020

Nixon resigned in August.

Turn up the heat! Make it clear he will NEVER be reelected and make the rest of his term as painful as possible from everyone in Congress while showcasing his incompetence.

Caliman73

(11,736 posts)
39. That won't work in the age of Trump.
Mon May 11, 2020, 06:54 PM
May 2020

Today is a different day in terms of media. Even if the major media outlets call for a resignation, there is an entire media ecosystem on the right that would just counter with, "The liberal media is totally on a witch hunt" and it would be just another left v right thing.

You have to understand the difference between media in Nixon's time and media today. The major legacy papers NYT, WaPost, Tribune papers, Wall St. Journal, and the major broadcasters, NBC, CBS, and ABC, plus the fledgling PBS were it. There were some right wing papers or magazines and some left wing outlets but both were basically ignored.

Ideas were spun, but the facts reported to almost every American who sought out news, was basically the same.

Now, you have 40% to 50% of the population getting information that is completely detached from reality. The right wing media ecosystem keeps a large chunk of the population thinking that Trump is a heroic figure that the media and evil liberals are trying to ruin.

Celerity

(43,349 posts)
42. We are no longer in 1974, the Republicans are hyper-partisan, see a kill shot, and will let Rump
Mon May 11, 2020, 07:00 PM
May 2020

take it. They can smell the wafting stench of a flat out dictatorship coming into view on their event horizon. It makes their tiny todgers hard, it has them in a frenzy of rapaciousness, and they will kill and crush and block and imprison as many as they perceive to be needed in their attempts to grab that most odious of brass rings. Barr is 100% out of control. I can easily see him trying to criminally indict Obama before the election. Hell, they may go for Biden too I put NOTHING past them in terms of possibilities.


History doesn't repeat, but it often rhymes..................

 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
51. Still time to try again, try the mental incompetence angle, get a Dr to declare him deranged
Mon May 11, 2020, 07:16 PM
May 2020

Plenty of evidence for that!

Bayard

(22,063 posts)
14. This reminds me of the ads on TV
Mon May 11, 2020, 05:27 PM
May 2020

The ads pushing companies paying you some small sum immediately, if you sign over all your future payments from a court settlement to them. "Its my money and I want it now!"

Runningdawg

(4,516 posts)
18. I think he should announce on twitter that all SS payments will be cut in half effective immediatly.
Mon May 11, 2020, 05:57 PM
May 2020

Let's see how the cult reacts.

Haggis for Breakfast

(6,831 posts)
20. OVER MY ROTTING CORPSE WILL HE GET HIS GREEDY LITTLE
Mon May 11, 2020, 06:02 PM
May 2020

VULGARIAN FINGERS ON MY MILITARY BENEFITS.

WE, WHO HAVE SERVED THIS NATION, EARNED THIS. IT IS NOT A HAND-OUT. IT IS NOT A PRIVILEGE. IT IS NOT SOMETHING THAT CAN, OR SHOULD EVER BE, BARTERED WITH IN ANY WAY, BY THIS ADMINISTRATION OR ANY OTHER.

AND IT IS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING THAT I WILL TOLERATE BEING MANIPULATED, DELAYED OR DEFERRED, IN ANY WAY, FROM THAT CHICKENSHIT COWARD COCKSUCKER IN THE WH.

Codifer

(546 posts)
32. THIS!!!!
Mon May 11, 2020, 06:23 PM
May 2020

I totally agree.

This illegitimate administration of treasonous assholes has already crushed our spirit by the destruction of our nation and now want to make our demise and death complete.

FUCK THAT!!!

lonely bird

(1,685 posts)
21. 10 Grand?
Mon May 11, 2020, 06:05 PM
May 2020

That is not even 1/3 of a year for me when I finally retire. Shit, bad math. It is about a third of a year. What would getting 10K now do to me three years from now?

Fuck Trump. Raise taxes on the wealthy, you orange pile of shit.

Jarqui

(10,123 posts)
25. Fight fire with fire
Mon May 11, 2020, 06:13 PM
May 2020

This is Trump's 'death panel' moment

Tell the elderly it is a trick. Trump is coming for their Social Security.
Hammer it home relentlessly.
That is his best demographic.
Couple that with what he and the GOP have allowed in terms of risking and killing the elderly in their rush to revive the economy.
Then see what his polls and the polls of the GOP Senators look like ...

It's high time to take off the gloves, give them a dose of their own medicine and beat the snot out of these heartless pricks.

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
27. Joe and Nancy better
Mon May 11, 2020, 06:18 PM
May 2020

...scream this to the rafters. Seeing as how our MSM will report it for day and move on to the next sensation.

This information spread and far and wide would turn out the vote for Democrats massively. But it has to be said louder than the Repugs will scream about their guns or the deficit or whatever.

ffr

(22,669 posts)
28. Wait a cotton picking minute! The GOP isn't cutting SS, they are RAIDING it!
Mon May 11, 2020, 06:18 PM
May 2020

That's money we've paid into, you and me. Them cutting it, is just another way for the GOP to use that money as they see fit.

They are robbers, thieves, grifters. You vote for a republican, you vote to have them stab you in the back.

aggiesal

(8,914 posts)
33. Could I be able to send the money back to forego ...
Mon May 11, 2020, 06:25 PM
May 2020

any delay in planned benefits?
Because that's what I'm going to do.

The Mouth

(3,150 posts)
37. I'm trying to find the actual specfics.
Mon May 11, 2020, 06:47 PM
May 2020

At work and swamped, can someone point me to the actual proposals?

Thanks!

bottomofthehill

(8,329 posts)
38. I would love to see a copy of the Eagle Plan.
Mon May 11, 2020, 06:48 PM
May 2020

Hopefully it will come out like the CDC plans to open the economy that were never to see the light of day.

abakan

(1,819 posts)
45. It looks like I'm screwed.
Mon May 11, 2020, 07:02 PM
May 2020

I am a retired federal employee on social security. This will remove all my income.
The question is can the next president (not trump) undo all the damage? If not I might
as well go out get sick and die before I am reduced to begging.

VOX

(22,976 posts)
48. Any "plan" that stops current workers from paying into the fund will kill it for everyone.
Mon May 11, 2020, 07:07 PM
May 2020

It’s really a group insurance plan. We all chip in so some can have it in the present, knowing that when our time comes, it’ll be there for us.

Eliminating any payroll Social Security withholdings is tantamount to turning off the source and shutting it down.

“Eagle Plan” my ass.

CousinIT

(9,241 posts)
54. His plan (another one) was to stop current employers from paying into it....that's a 50% cut.
Mon May 11, 2020, 07:30 PM
May 2020

That, combined with this Vulture Plan, will essentially kill Social Security.

Social security is paid by employees and employers - if Trump wants a "tax holiday" for employers, that's a CUT to social security and you can bet your sweet bippy Republicans will want to make that "holiday" permanent. I wasn't concerned when Obama did this because Democrats would likely not make such a cut permanent - they are after all the party that created Social Security and Medicare. But Republicans would make it peermanent. In a heartbeat.

Maru Kitteh

(28,340 posts)
50. Is Prince Jared practicing for his fucking dance rehearsal in the background there?
Mon May 11, 2020, 07:12 PM
May 2020

Do that shit at home kid. Nobody wants to see you.

paleotn

(17,912 posts)
52. Well....lets just reach down and grab that ole 3rd rail of US politics.....
Mon May 11, 2020, 07:16 PM
May 2020

and see what happens.

Rethugs have such short memories. They should ask W what happens when you muck with Social Security. Burned up all his "political capital" for nothing. Hate that.

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/05/what-political-capital/304028/

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Monstrous": Trump is Con...