Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

SoonerPride

(12,286 posts)
3. oh yes I know, it is useless, except it is "official" model touted by the WH
Tue May 12, 2020, 05:29 PM
May 2020

which makes it newsworthy, I guess.

but its predictive usefulness is nil

brush

(53,776 posts)
6. And somehow the idiotically inept WH thinks 147,000 deaths by then...
Tue May 12, 2020, 05:51 PM
May 2020

Last edited Tue May 12, 2020, 07:11 PM - Edit history (1)

makes them look good. They live in their own up-side-down. bizzarro world, which going by that model still leaves three months to election day, and with a very conservative estimate of 30k deaths a month, would be some 240,000 deaths by election day on Nov. 3.

Hallelujah!

Are they all snorting Adderol in the trump WH?

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
2. K&R, IHME assumptions beyond asinine and the new one is too assuming we'll have "testing" that's ...
Tue May 12, 2020, 05:28 PM
May 2020

... like having a sane president.

The failing of the 4th estate is proffer and frame questions as Trump is sane, he's not

drray23

(7,627 posts)
7. I think the issues with most models and particularly this one
Tue May 12, 2020, 06:00 PM
May 2020

is probably not the math underneath but rather the unrealistic assumptions that they have. For example, expecting that there will be wide scale testing and good quarantining. I would like to see what all these models say if they ran them with realistic expectations or even the worst case scenario where we do nothing. That would likely result in much higher numbers and probably closer to the actual truth..

SoonerPride

(12,286 posts)
9. I agree. I think enough people are ignoring warnings
Wed May 13, 2020, 07:36 AM
May 2020

I think they need to factor in closer to worst case scenario because a significant number of people are ignoring all guidance.

No masks
No distance
No concern at all

How does that increase the infection rate?

probably badly .

ProfessorGAC

(65,013 posts)
10. I Checked It Yesterday
Wed May 13, 2020, 07:38 AM
May 2020

The upper end of the prediction interval was about 243,000.
The lower end, around 113,000.
So, your 250k isn't unrealistic.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CNN reports IHME model in...