Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

napi21

(45,806 posts)
1. Not really. It's no surprise that FOX leads the pack. Apparently real Pubbies love FOX where they
Fri May 22, 2020, 10:32 PM
May 2020

can hear people reinforcing their opinions/ Glad to see Rachel leading every other cable program. She deserves it.

empedocles

(15,751 posts)
10. Big national news 3x bigger. More credible also.
Sat May 23, 2020, 11:21 AM
May 2020

' . . . It's also small potatoes compared the three network evening newscasts, which averaged almost three times as many viewers — 29.67 million — in the week of April 13. The most-watched show in cable news last week, Fox News' Special Report With Bret Baier (5.77 million daily viewers), fell more than a million people short of the third-place network newscast, CBS Evening News (7.52 million, including a re-airing at 4 a.m. the next day).' - Hollywood Reportere

totodeinhere

(13,058 posts)
4. I am worried about the election but not because of Fox News ratings.
Fri May 22, 2020, 10:38 PM
May 2020

Fox News was getting good ratings in 2008 and 2012 yet that did not stop President Obama's election. And Fox News did not stop the blue wave 2018 midterm election.

What I am worried about the most is that Trump and his Russian buddies will find a way to use the pandemic as cover to steal the election. I think that is the realistic danger, not Fox News.

BannonsLiver

(16,370 posts)
5. Same 1-3 million morons watch the entire lineup, so no.
Fri May 22, 2020, 10:41 PM
May 2020

Another takeaway, if I’m running MSNBC I’d fire Chris Hayes. His ratings are abysmal. Also, this proves what I suspected about Melber’s lousy show as well. Nobody watches it.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
6. Those numbers are infinitesimal.
Fri May 22, 2020, 10:42 PM
May 2020

Even the highest-rated program there is pulling down something like one tenth of one percent of the population. Cable news is a wasteland for elderly white retirees who lack decent hobbies.

C_U_L8R

(45,000 posts)
7. They just have a monopoly on idiots.
Fri May 22, 2020, 10:44 PM
May 2020

The majority, the thinking people, are shared across diverse media.

ChoppinBroccoli

(3,784 posts)
8. They Watch Fox To Be Told What To Think
Fri May 22, 2020, 10:45 PM
May 2020

They're not smart enough to form their own opinions, so they turn on Faux News hoping to hear why they're right for liking Trump when all the evidence of their eyes and ears tells them they're wrong. People who are able to form their own opinions don't need a screaming, condescending talking head on TV to tell them what to think, so they don't bother with it.

Alex4Martinez

(2,193 posts)
11. Look at the shows' times: at 10:00 pm CNN + MSNBC viewers 709,000 versus 520,000 for Fox.
Sat May 23, 2020, 11:27 AM
May 2020

No, I suspect it's the same 500,000 watching each of the various Fox shows.

My dear friend, sort of surrogate mom, 85 years old, has Fox on round the clock.

totodeinhere

(13,058 posts)
12. Yes but advertisers have to pay separately for each channel so to them Fox News is more
Sat May 23, 2020, 10:17 PM
May 2020

valuable because it has a plurality of viewers. To reach all of those 709,000 viewers they would have to buy spots on two different networks,

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should this be a worry co...