General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRomney wants to wage a war on porn
http://www.forbes.com/sites/susannahbreslin/2012/09/13/mitt-romney-porn/They want to put me in jail, basically.
Thats how porn director John Stagliano responds when I ask him what he thinks of the 2012 GOP platform,in particular one newly added sentence:
Current laws on all forms of pornography and obscenity need to be vigorously enforced.
Two years ago, Stagliano was sitting in a Washington,D.C., courtroom, charged with seven counts of distributing obscenity.
Gee, that's what we need in this country: another war on sin, which would result in people getting years of prison for doing nothing more than making pictures of people fucking.
The prison-industrial complex needs more slaves...
meow2u3
(24,768 posts)Many men want their porn without running the risk of being locked up for it.
JaneQPublic
(7,113 posts)underpants
(182,866 posts)Marriott, Mitt Romney, and porn
Feb 5th 2011, 18:37 by N.B. | WASHINGTON, DC
..
THE HOTEL chain Marriott recently announced that it would cease selling "adult content"ie, pornographyin its newer hotels. Anyone who knows a bit about the hotel business might find this move a bit confusing. After all, porn is still a moneymaker for chains like Marriott, which by some estimates was earning $175 per room, per year in smut peddling alone.
But there does seem to be a method to Marriott's madness. Politico's Ben Smith explains that Mitt Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts and a presumptive candidate for the Republican presidential nomination in 2012, recently left the Marriott board. The chain's owners are "longtime Romney supporters", Mr Smith notes. And social conservatives, apparently, hit Mr Romney hard on the porn "issue" during the ex-governor's 2008 campaign for the GOP nomination. (One critic called Mr Romney a "major pornographer." So in some sense, Mr Smith argues, Marriott appears to be doing Mr Romney a "costly favor." Then again:
Another person familiar with the workings of the industry, though, cast doubt on the connection: The in-room movie business has been hit hard by wifi, Netflix, iPads, and laptops, and the structure of contracts with providers could well have made it a solid economic decision.
http://www.economist.com/blogs/gulliver/2011/02/hotel_pornography
socialindependocrat
(1,372 posts)Adult content is material that is not sold to minors.
Pornography is illegal material and can not be sold.
Labeling pictures and movies of concenting adults with no cloths on
as pornography is rediculous.
Don't adult materials make the largest profits on the internet?
Good luck trying to legislate morality.
"Heir Houtmann - Ve vill stop all fun! Ist dat understood?!"
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)they have their own ideas
sex is porn unless you are trying to get pregnant
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)The difference between "adult content" and "illegal pornography" is specious at best.
As far as I'm concerned, pornography, including the really nasty hardcore stuff should be legal and protected under the First Amendment. The only exception being stuff like child porn, because a child is being abused in making it.
But if consenting adults are doing BDSM, German scheissporn, or whatever, it should be legal.
What is it about moralizing crotch-sniffers demanding legal authority and imprisoning people for making movies they don't like?
socialindependocrat
(1,372 posts)You wrote - "including the really nasty hardcore stuff"
Not a judgment but - when you say "nasty", I think distasteful
Some people think the more "nasty" the greater the turn-on
I like the phrase - Sex is only dirty if you do it right.
I guess that's why I want "pornography" to be limited to the
really bad stuff - as you said - child porn.
I guess we agree that if concenting adults want to film and show sexual acts it should be left to the discretion of the viewer and not legislated by the government.
never mind - unless you would like to add something.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)One person's "nasty" is another person's "OMG THAT'S HOT!"
Since the standards vary WIDELY from one person to another, trying to shoehorn a single standard and enforce it with the guns of government can only lead to insanity.
That's why I think we should leave it at the "if they're consenting adults, leave them alone!" standard.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)off of corporations they have to put the regulations on real people
corporations being non-real people
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)The Mormon theocracy demanded it so rMoney could become President.
Response to backscatter712 (Original post)
darkangel218 This message was self-deleted by its author.
rurallib
(62,434 posts)darkangel218
(13,985 posts)mitchtv
(17,718 posts)unless they've given up their hotel PPV already (for the Lord)
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)as soon as it looked like Mittens was going to get the nomination.
porphyrian
(18,530 posts)onethatcares
(16,178 posts)cause there ain't no masturbaiting in prison, oh hell no.
johnlucas
(1,250 posts)People may not fight about taxes or food prices or gas prices or the usual everyday corruption going on but they'll take it to the streets if you mess with their porno.
Want to get the revolution started? Attack the porn.
The Revolution will not be televised, it'll be webcammed!
John Lucas
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)but in November, I think their hands will be doing something else.
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)to concentrte on Kiddie porn
malaise
(269,157 posts)cr8tvlde
(1,185 posts)Thing is, one has to LOOK AT IT first to determine if it is pornography or not. You can't take anyone's word for it. So, bring it on and stack it up over there...let's see if it is Really Porn. We'll get back to you. I'd LOL, but it's very sad.
pokerfan
(27,677 posts)RKP5637
(67,112 posts)edhopper
(33,606 posts)MAKE LOVE NOT WAR!
Aerows
(39,961 posts)It's the only way this butthead will get elected, and the only way people will like him is if he is "Commander-in-Chief" of the next war.
He knows no one likes him, but still, he presses on, robot that he is.
I might like him more if I found out he WAS a robot.
Mostly he's just an asshole with grey sideburns.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)appleannie1
(5,068 posts)RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)hughee99
(16,113 posts)Last edited Sat Sep 15, 2012, 08:41 PM - Edit history (1)
than the fundies. Romney will spend exactly ZERO seconds talking about or working on legislation for pornography, abortion, "protecting marriage" or any of the other issues on the social agenda of the right wing. As soon as Romney loses interest in their votes, he'll lose interest in their issues. This is what happens you have NO core values.
Raine
(30,540 posts)everyone knows that. They're going to go crazy without their number one entertainent.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)sadbear
(4,340 posts)Because I never, ever want to have to say, "Free Buttman!!!"
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)malokvale77
(4,879 posts)the depiction of acts in a sensational manner so as to arouse a quick intense emotional reaction
Remember the photo of Mitt and his buddies with all the money stuffed about their person.
MatthewStLouis
(904 posts)I'm not sure if that's a great idea for his campaign or his marriage.