Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why can't Pelosi just order the irs to hand over Trump's taxes? (Original Post) GusFring Jun 2020 OP
Nope. Privacy laws. Only a court can force opening IRS files. Same with Census files and... TreasonousBastard Jun 2020 #1
I think it's strange that it's so hard to get financial records captain queeg Jun 2020 #5
No. It doesn't work that way. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2020 #2
There is not a lot of leeway. The Court should put this to rest bottomofthehill Jun 2020 #3
From CRS bottomofthehill Jun 2020 #4

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
1. Nope. Privacy laws. Only a court can force opening IRS files. Same with Census files and...
Sun Jun 28, 2020, 12:27 PM
Jun 2020

some others.

The house can subpoena things, but if they say no, it goes to court to decide.

captain queeg

(10,208 posts)
5. I think it's strange that it's so hard to get financial records
Sun Jun 28, 2020, 01:20 PM
Jun 2020

Has the FBI asked for them? Personal health records (HIPPA) can be gotten by LE. In America I guess it’s ok to learn. All about someone’s medical record but not financial?

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,735 posts)
2. No. It doesn't work that way.
Sun Jun 28, 2020, 12:28 PM
Jun 2020

"Oversight" means only that they can hold hearings and determine whether the executive branch is properly fulfilling its constitutional duties, and they can legislate and appropriate funds in order to place some controls on the executive. They can recommend and refer matters to the DoJ for criminal prosecution if their investigation finds evidence of crimes. They have no power to arrest or prosecute.

bottomofthehill

(8,334 posts)
3. There is not a lot of leeway. The Court should put this to rest
Sun Jun 28, 2020, 01:08 PM
Jun 2020

Congressional Committee Authority to Obtain Tax Returns

In 1976, Congress amended Section 6103 of the IRC to establish that federal tax return information is confidential by default unless a statute expressly authorizes disclosure. Congress made these changes in part to curtail the President’s authority to acquire tax return information in response to revelations that President Nixon sought to use tax return information for improper purposes. Specifically, Section 6103(a) states that individual and business tax returns, and the information in tax returns, are confidential, and officers or employees of the federal government, among others, may not disseminate those returns or the information therein for unauthorized purposes without the taxpayer’s consent. Section 6103(b)(2)(A) defines “return information” to include, among other things, “a taxpayer’s identity, the nature, source, or amount of his income, payments, receipts, deductions, exemptions, credits, assets, liabilities, net worth, . . . or tax payment.” This policy is bolstered by a series of statutes providing for criminal penalties and authorizing the taxpayer to bring a civil action for damages for unauthorized disclosures of return information. However, Congress has established a number of exceptions to this general proscription against disclosing taxpayer information, including certain disclosures for use in legitimate tax administration, criminal proceedings, audits conducted by the Government Accountability Office, and child support enforcement activities.
One such exception is the statute’s authorization of certain congressional committees with jurisdiction over federal taxes to acquire tax return information. Congress originally provided this authority in 1924 in part to address perceived difficulties in acquiring tax information during congressional investigations into the Harding Administration’s Teapot Dome scandal. Specifically, Section 6103(f)(1) of the IRC provides that, upon written request of the Chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT), or Senate Finance Committee (hereinafter referred to as the “tax committees”), the Treasury Secretary “shall furnish” the requested tax returns or return information to the relevant committee. Under 6103(f)(2), the Treasury Secretary also “shall furnish” requested tax return information to the JCT’s chief of staff, who may share the return information to any of the tax committees. Absent the relevant taxpayer’s consent, any personally identifiable tax return information received by a tax committee under 6103(f)(1) or (f)(2) may only be provided when the requesting committee is “in closed executive session.” Section 6103(f)(5) also authorizes a whistleblower who has access to tax return information to disclose it to the tax committees “if such person believes such return or return information may relate to possible misconduct, maladministration, or taxpayer abuse.”
Section 6103(f)(3) also directs the Treasury Secretary to provide return information to any other non-tax committee in response to a written request, but only if the House or Senate passes a resolution specifically authorizing such committees to inspect return information.
Possible Legal Limitations to Congressional

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why can't Pelosi just ord...