Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsProsecutor: No Charges for Officer in Michael Brown's Death
St. Louis Countys prosecutor announced Thursday that he will not charge the former police officer who fatally shot Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, a dramatic decision that could reopen old wounds amid a renewed and intense national conversation about racial injustice and the police treatment of people of color.
Prosecuting Attorney Wesley Bell's decision marked the third time prosecutors investigated and opted not to charge Darren Wilson, the white officer who fatally shot Brown, a Black 18-year-old, on Aug. 9, 2014. A St. Louis County grand jury declined to indict Wilson in November 2014, and the U.S. Department of Justice also declined to charge him in March 2015.
Civil rights leaders and Browns parents had hoped that Bell, the
countys first Black prosecutor who took office in January 2019, would see things differently.
snip
Civil rights leaders and Browns parents had hoped that Bell, the countys first Black prosecutor who took office in January 2019, would see things differently.
But, he said, our investigation does not exonerate Darren Wilson.
Prosecuting Attorney Wesley Bell's decision marked the third time prosecutors investigated and opted not to charge Darren Wilson, the white officer who fatally shot Brown, a Black 18-year-old, on Aug. 9, 2014. A St. Louis County grand jury declined to indict Wilson in November 2014, and the U.S. Department of Justice also declined to charge him in March 2015.
Civil rights leaders and Browns parents had hoped that Bell, the
countys first Black prosecutor who took office in January 2019, would see things differently.
snip
Civil rights leaders and Browns parents had hoped that Bell, the countys first Black prosecutor who took office in January 2019, would see things differently.
But, he said, our investigation does not exonerate Darren Wilson.
https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/national-international/prosecutor-no-charges-for-officer-in-michael-browns-death/2314331/
opted not to charge opted not to charge opted not to charge
No Justice No Peace
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 684 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Prosecutor: No Charges for Officer in Michael Brown's Death (Original Post)
sheshe2
Jul 2020
OP
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)1. DA Bell said: "our investigation does not exonerate Darren Wilson."
However, he opted not to charge him.
What does that even mean?
Maraya1969
(22,497 posts)3. Maybe he did it to help the Brown family sue the police?
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)4. Perhaps that the DA did not feel certain about a conviction.
All that is needed is 1 racist on the jury.
sheshe2
(83,898 posts)8. I hear you.
Sigh
lastlib
(23,286 posts)10. That was the rationale that I gleaned from his presser.
That murder/manslaughter could not be proved against a cop (who has a higher presumption of innocence than an ordinary civilian) beyond reasonable doubt. Sounded to me like he was implicitly holding the door open for civil suit against the cop, where a lower standard of proof is required.
nsd
(2,406 posts)5. Bell was elected *because* of the Michael Brown case.
No matter what, he has to hold onto the idea that there was a case to be made. Otherwise, why is he DA?
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)7. He said he did not feel that he had a good enough case.
It only takes 1 racist juror.
crickets
(25,983 posts)6. Wow. No words.
Celerity
(43,498 posts)9. K & R for visibility