Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsExponential growth bias: The numerical error behind Covid-19
A simple mathematical mistake may explain why many people underestimate the dangers of coronavirus, shunning social distancing, masks and hand-washing.https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20200812-exponential-growth-bias-the-numerical-error-behind-covid-19
Imagine you are offered a deal with your bank, where your money doubles every three days. If you invest just $1 today, roughly how long will it take for you to become a millionaire?
Would it be a year? Six months? 100 days?
The precise answer is 60 days from your initial investment, when your balance would be exactly $1,048,576. Within a further 30 days, youd have earnt more than a billion. And by the end of the year, youd have more than $1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 an undecillion dollars.
If your estimates were way out, you are not alone. Many people consistently underestimate how fast the value increases a mistake known as the exponential growth bias and while it may seem abstract, it may have had profound consequences for peoples behaviour this year.
A spate of studies has shown that people who are susceptible to the exponential growth bias are less concerned about Covid-19s spread, and less likely to endorse measures like social distancing, hand washing or mask wearing. In other words, this simple mathematical error could be costing lives meaning that the correction of the bias should be a priority as we attempt to flatten curves and avoid second waves of the pandemic around the world.
*snip*
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 609 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Exponential growth bias: The numerical error behind Covid-19 (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Aug 2020
OP
empedocles
(15,751 posts)1. Such an interesting explanation
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)2. K&R!
Mind boggling! Ty for sharing!
Nevilledog
(51,197 posts)3. ...
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)4. Well I'm pretty sure the Sturgis crowd
Doesn't get this.
karynnj
(59,504 posts)5. Also, it is why early effective action makes a HUGE difference
Graphs showed the expected change in cases and deaths of effective intervention. A difference of a week led to vastly different numbers.
Given that we are best to assume it is everywhere now, it will be harder to get control and then be able to handle future outbreaks quickly.