General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSanders: America must be prepared for when Trump refuses to leave office
We need to alert the American people about what that nightmarish scenario might look like, the Vermont senator said.
By HOLLY OTTERBEIN
09/04/2020 05:59 PM EDT
Bernie Sanders fears President Donald Trump will refuse to leave office if he loses reelection and is calling on Congress and the media to take action to prepare for that scenario now, he said in an interview with POLITICO.
This is not just idle speculation, said Sanders, pointing to comments the president made at the GOP convention. Trump was saying that the only way he could lose the election is if there was let me get the exact quote the only way they can take this election away from us is if this is a rigged election. Now he is making that statement at a time when virtually every national poll has him behind.
The Vermont senator said Trump also signaled the possibility of refusing to concede after defeat in a July interview with FOX News Chris Wallace, in which he was asked whether he would accept the election results. Trump said, "I have to see. Look, you I have to see. No, Im not going to just say yes. Im not going to say no, and I didnt last time, either.
Trump has floated delaying the presidential election, and made false claims that mail ballots are fraudulent and that he lost the popular vote in 2016 because of ballots cast by millions of undocumented immigrants.
snip
more from the best political reporter everrrrr! at link
TwilightZone
(25,471 posts)And we should really stop giving it attention.
JoeOtterbein
(7,700 posts)...prepared"
sheshe2
(83,758 posts)Be very afraid?
This all should have been considered last go around in 2016.
Democratic votes matter.
I remember a quote back in 16. It doesn't matter who you vote for...it only matters that you voted. Loose quote, yet memories fade.
Fact is it does matter how you voted. This is how we got trump.
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)rzemanfl
(29,557 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(26,327 posts)We could have a mess on our hands that could end up being decided by the President of The Senate - aka Mike Pence.
This was written in 2019. Very long but interesting.
I was looking for procedures for certifying a Presidential election and how fuck face might try to take advantage of an election night lead to claim victory.
This reads like a horror novel.
Its long.
They lay out several scenarios. One scenario is a state with a Republican run legislature, like Pennsylvania, could certify a different set of results based on Trumps call to arms. This could send conflicting Elector counts to The Senate President. Mike Pence could conceivably be the arbiter of what Elector count to accept
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
Volume 51
Issue 2 Winter 2019
https://lawecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2719&context=luclj
This Article considers the possibility that a major dispute over the outcome of the 2020 presidential election could arise, even without foreign interference or some other extraordinary event, but rather just from the ordinary process of counting ballots. Building upon previous research on the blue shift phenomenon, whereby adjustments in vote tallies during the canvassing of returns tends to advantage Democratic candidates, it is easy to imagine a dispute arising if this kind of blue shift were consequential in the presidential race. Using examples from both Pennsylvania and Arizona, two states susceptible to significant blue shifts in previous elections, the article shows how the dispute could reach Congress, where it potentially might metastasize into a full-fledged constitutional crisis. The most frightening scenario is where the dispute remains unresolved on January 20, 2021, the date for the inauguration of the new presidential term, and the military is uncertain as to who is entitled to receive the nuclear codes as commander-in-chief. In order to avoid this risk, Congress should amend the relevant statute, 3 U.S.C. § 15.
AXIOS piece on potential blue shift in this election.
TheRealNorth
(9,481 posts)As it has an air of constitutionality that would give excuse to Republicans in the Military and law enforcement.
Now, I don't know if each state has laws or constitutional rules as there may be state laws against state legislatures going rogue with regards to appointing a different set of electors from the candidate that was democratically elected. Of course, if that state's Supreme Court is owned by Republicans (like in WI), those statutes or Constitutional requirements could be moot as well.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,327 posts)... to the legislature in the event of a dispute. Then to the Senate President Pence for counting.
Tribetime
(4,695 posts)W_HAMILTON
(7,866 posts)struggle4progress
(118,282 posts)let us quote: Treason against the United States shall consist .. in levying war against them
Do they really think they could stand upright in the winds that would blow then?
oasis
(49,383 posts)Coward Trump's crumbling before our very eyes. I'm not sweating a damn thing.
sheshe2
(83,758 posts)Okay.
George II
(67,782 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)When January 20, 2021 rolls around, if a new President hasn't been sworn in, Speaker Nancy Pelosi will assume the office of the Presidency.
Does trump REALLY want to be responsible for the first woman President?
sheshe2
(83,758 posts)True dat.
I don't think so.
Sogo
(4,986 posts)Last edited Fri Sep 4, 2020, 11:53 PM - Edit history (1)
On January 20, 2021, a new President will be sworn in.
At that point, the Secret Service will remove any trespassers who might try to remain in the WH.
brush
(53,777 posts)Sogo
(4,986 posts)I remember thinking "20" when I typed the post....
I need to go to bed!
George II
(67,782 posts)...Nancy Pelosi will be sworn in as President, in accordance with the United States Constitution.
kentuck
(111,094 posts)Election Day should be changed to Election Season. They should attempt to have all the votes counted by the last week in November. But the USPS will need to be inspected and repaired before the November 3rd election. That will give Trump time to move out of the White House if the numbers come out against him? That would also give the House and Senate time to reach a compromise for governing. The new Congress would not take over until January 3rd, 2021. The Republicans will be given an ultimatum: They can either persuade Mr Trump to leave the People's House or they can agree to remove him by impeachment? Otherwise, they hold all accountability to remove the vagrant from the People's House.
(I doubt whether the Democratic or Republican leaders have given it much thought?)
George II
(67,782 posts)GeorgiaPeanut
(360 posts)but obviously Politico does.
Gothmog
(145,231 posts)There was a conference call for LFB last week with 285 lawyers on the call. There are a ton of work being done to game out situations and scenarios
lapucelle
(18,252 posts)Last edited Sat Sep 5, 2020, 10:59 AM - Edit history (1)
are already working out scenarios and first steps, rather than just waking up to the potential problem. That's grassroots activism at its best.*****************************************************************************************************
Here are links to relevant articles from June, July, and August.
Speaker Pelosi, Rep. Clyburn, and Senator Warren have already addressed the possibility.
https://www.axios.com/clyburn-trump-wont-leave-if-he-loses-election-7118712f-90db-4c68-a7fe-78ead3b5f384.html
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-pelosi/pelosi-says-trump-will-be-fumigated-out-if-he-refuses-to-leave-after-white-house-loss-idUSKCN24L2DP
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/509516-warren-calls-on-officials-to-pledge-not-to-deploy-agents-if-trump-refuses-to
https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/what-could-happen-if-donald-trump-rejects-electoral-defeat
https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/17/opinions/if-trump-loses-and-refuses-to-leave-callan/index.html
Some of the presidents opponents fear that hell refuse to leave the White House if he loses the election. Heres why.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/06/when-does-trump-leave-white-house/613060/
https://atlanticsentinel.com/2020/08/what-if-trump-refuses-to-leave/
https://www.good.is/Politics/new-campaign-is-organizing-people-to-fight-back-if-trump-refuses-to-leave-the-white-house
https://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/politics/cotterell/2020/08/01/what-if-trump-loses-but-wont-leave/5557023002/
https://verdict.justia.com/2020/06/24/trumps-upcoming-refusal-to-leave-office-the-good-news
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jul/27/trump-loses-election-what-happens-possibilities
https://www.startribune.com/ok-assume-trump-loses-and-won-t-leave/571691592/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trumps-assault-on-election-integrity-forces-question-what-would-happen-if-he-refused-to-accept-a-loss/2020/07/22/d2477150-caae-11ea-b0e3-d55bda07d66a_story.html
https://www.salon.com/2020/07/16/fearing-jail-and-facing-defeat-trump-will-not-leave-office-quietly_partner/
betsuni
(25,519 posts)This has been a topic for a long time.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Last edited Sat Sep 5, 2020, 09:34 AM - Edit history (1)
This is ridiculous. Totally absurd. It doesn't matter if Trump voluntarily "concedes" or not. Anyone who knows how things work will realize this. When Biden is sworn-in on Jan 20th, he will be the President. Trump will either leave, or he'll be escorted out.
What useful purpose does it serve? It's just another example of how people are oddly willing to do and say things that create an atmosphere of fear and hopelessness and negativity. Negativity generates apathy. Apathy discourages voter turnout. Low voter turnout gives Republicans a chance to steal the elections.
Honestly, all I'm trying to say is that this makes as much sense to get people riled-up about this as it does to create panic about a "Fear the Walking Dead" zombie apocalypse. That's hardly the "best political reporting everrrrr".
(Me... after reading shitty articles like this one from Politico. "I need a drink, Roz!'')
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #28)
Post removed
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)30. Poor nurses like you. You work so hard then are forced to...
...drink by reporters.
Sad!
George II
(67,782 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,972 posts)Me.
(35,454 posts)Politico must be running out of dems in disarray stories
notinkansas
(1,096 posts)Unfortunately, its wrong. The GOP has done this before, an action that included multiple threats of violence and bloodshed on the floor of Congress, leading Democrats to cave in even though their candidate won the popular vote and had 22 more electoral votes than the Republican (who became president).
Additionally, the Constitution says that if a presidential election really turns into a mess with multiple claims of fraud or some other crisis, the president is selected by the U.S. House of Representatives.
While that sounds like good news, with Democrats controlling the House today, each states delegation only gets one vote50 votes from 50 states determine the president. And a majority of the states are Republican-controlled, so this remedy would put Trump into office regardless of how badly he lost the popular vote, the electoral vote, or both.
Towlie
(5,324 posts)In fact, Putin might be the one planning it.