General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPeter Strzok questions Trump's hidden assets not found in bombshell report -- and if he's compromised
September 28, 2020
By Sarah K. Burris
Former FBI agent Peter Strzok sounded the alarm about the recent revelations in the New York Times expose on President Donald Trumps taxes. According to him, there should be a counterintelligence investigation into Trumps finances and how they coincide with foreign policies that make no sense for the United States.
Speaking with former FBI deputy Frank Figliuzzi and MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace, Strzok called the Times exposé a roadmap for the ways in which Trump could be compromised by hostile powers. It could also explain Trumps issues he has with the intelligence community, who would know about any deals he may have made.
Part of the concern of any counterintelligence professional is looking for these hidden financial entanglements, the Trump foe explained. And watching and having done that over six different administrations, every foreign country is trying to use money to get leverage and influence on any given presidency. What the information in The New York Times reports out of those tax records, the breadth and volume of that monetary back and forth is stunning. Its simply unprecedented [of] in any president in modern history. so if you look at the ways that can be used to, as leverage over Trump, you have to think of this first and foremost as a national security issue. yes, this is a financial issue, but first and foremost, the ways that it can be used to impact the national security of the United States, by the way, can be used against Trump is unprecedented and is deeply concerning.
When it comes to links between Trump and Russia and the investigation that Strzok worked on, this seems different than the financial concerns of the Trump Organization.
snip
MagickMuffin
(15,969 posts)The Intelligence Community needs to start digging and fast. He is a THREAT to our National Security.
Of course we already knew that, but it's getting closer to the election ALL HANDS ON DECK!
intrepidity
(7,339 posts)He is a threat now and in the future.
Losing the election won't change that.
Underappreciated point!
marlakay
(11,521 posts)Problem from the time he was running the first time and yet as a matter of securing the nation they did nothing to stop him and enabled him by going after Hillary and not the Russian info they had which in the Comey movie seemed like Hillary was first priority and Russia only after election when it was too late to stop him because he had the power to fire anyone who investigated him.
Its bullshit that Comey says he wanted to be fair, if he did the Russia info would be out also at same time hers was. I could tell by the movie a lot of people in dept didn't like Hillary, I think they wanted her to win over Trump but wanted to take her down a few pegs.
BigmanPigman
(51,643 posts)I HATE Comey and even Hillary said he cost her the election. Fuck him!!!
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)Why is this asset or agent of foreign powers allowed to roam free as president?
I always thought treason was frowned upon. Boy was I wrong.
stillcool
(32,626 posts)didn't the Deutsche Bank, or Rosemary Vrablic have a money-laundering connection with a Russian bank?
crickets
(25,987 posts)It isn't just about what trump has done, it is about the danger he still will pose in the future, whether elected or not. Investigations need to start now, and we need to get to the bottom of all of his foreign business dealings. He is an ongoing national security risk.
mitch96
(13,932 posts)Eisenhower in the 1960 election.. He politely refused and went right to the FBI..
M
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/how-adlai-stevenson-stopped-russian-interference-1960-election-180961681/
AZ8theist
(5,517 posts)Which makes that the ONLY realistic option for his future.