Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHere it fu*kin' is. P 283 in Woodward's book, "Rage"
Mid March regarding the coronavirus
In private he told others of his deepest fears. "It's not to stop the spread," Redfield said, "We were now in a race. I think we all understood now we were in a race. We're in a marathon. We're in a two-year, three-year race. Not a one-year, not a six month race. The race is to slow and contain this virus as much as humanly possible, with all our efforts, till we can get a highly efficacious vaccine deployed for all the American people and then beyond that to the rest of the world."
All the talk about the virus going away or disappearing was medically false.
All the talk about the virus going away or disappearing was medically false.
Redfield is Robert R. Redfield, MD, a virologist who is Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
My professional background is in hospital administration. I have an MPH from UCLA (1975). Epidemiology was a required course in graduate school. It was natural for me to start following this thing pretty closely in March and very quickly realize that we were in this for the long haul. This section from Woodward's book that I outlined above is the first I've seen in print an admission that people in the know, in charge, understood in March that we were facing a long haul with this thing.
In April I made the decision to buy a house specifically because of my concern that for the next two or three years (funny how that matches Redfield's fear) living in a high rise apartment was not going to be the optimal place for my health and that all the reasons for being in a walkable downtown environment with proximity to entertainment, restaurants, services, wasn't going to mean anything because in order to protect my health I was not going to want to expose myself to large groups of people indoors. That is just basic public health practice to reduce the spread of communicable diseases. So, even though I had just moved last November--telling myself I intended to stay put for at least several years--I decided it would put me at less risk to be in a house. I would trade my downtown benefits for a house with a small courtyard and garden of plants, flowers, a fountain, and proximity to a walking trail. The house is under construction and I hope to move in before the end of the year. I hope I stay well until then. (I couldn't move right away without incurring a big penalty on my lease, so waiting for the house to be built seemed financially prudent, if not ideal in terms of health risk.)
I would encourage people--if you haven't already--to think about the long term for yourself and take steps to minimize your risk of contracting COVID-19.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1807 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (20)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here it fu*kin' is. P 283 in Woodward's book, "Rage" (Original Post)
mnhtnbb
Oct 2020
OP
KewlKat
(5,624 posts)2. When this first started I thought the only way we could get back to normal was thru a vaccine
I told my spouse we need to find a way to survive the next few years until one comes along.
Glad my thoughts are confirmed thru your excerpt.
mnhtnbb
(31,399 posts)3. Yes and it takes time not only to develop a vaccine
but also to run it through a large enough population in clinical trials to see whether it works and whether it has serious side effects.
It takes time.
rzemanfl
(29,566 posts)4. Good find. Thanks for posting. n/t
dixiechiken1
(2,113 posts)5. K&R
Good post. Thx!
moondust
(20,002 posts)6. Yeah.
I'm not optimistic about returning to "normal" very soon if ever given the global pervasiveness of the concurrent health, economic, educational, and leadership disasters. May be time to start looking at those tiny houses.