General Discussion

Baitball Blogger

(46,761 posts) Tue Oct 13, 2020, 02:23 PM Oct 2020

Hmmm....she just said that she'll respect the laws, as written. Yet, she also said

that the law is the law until it's changed.

Hmm...mmm...

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hmmm....she just said that she'll respect the laws, as written. Yet, she also said (Original Post) Baitball Blogger Oct 2020 OP

Especially applicable Cartaphelius Oct 2020 #1

She also referred to super precedents, which I assume held a majority of votes on the SC. Baitball Blogger Oct 2020 #2

Cartaphelius

(868 posts)

1. Especially applicable

Reply to Baitball Blogger (Original post)

Tue Oct 13, 2020, 03:59 PM

Oct 2020

when establishing the right of Religion to decide what
what our rights are because the court is controlled by
religious militants, destined to control human behavior
is the service of their faith.

You have 10 people. 9 believe in God's Law. One is atheist.

Who wins in a vote?

Is that Constitutional?

Anyone??

My vote is.....

NEVER! As it renders the one VOICELESS and IMPOTENT.

Baitball Blogger

(46,761 posts)

2. She also referred to super precedents, which I assume held a majority of votes on the SC.

Reply to Cartaphelius (Reply #1)

Tue Oct 13, 2020, 04:31 PM

Oct 2020

This is a concern because one of the Legal Studies classes that I took a UCF had a teacher who made a big deal about the 5-4 decisions. She made it sound like those cases can get overturned. In fact, there is no doubt in my mind that this has been the plan since the nineties.

Reply to this discussion