General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFollowing up on Rachel/Lawrence's very serious WARNINGS on 'ransom' threats against
hospitals/vote counts/etc. - designed to create distrust/reduce voter turnouts/ chaos on the Election. Putin heavily involved in this.
Rachel mentioned that the tech sectors were cooperating with US intelligence task forces to contain the problems.
My worries are that trump has installed his 'trumployalists first' hacks in key positions - they could warn trump/putin of containment plans.
Worse, putin may have planted spies, through trump, in key US agency positions.
Before the relentless news cycle overwhelms this - your thoughts?
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)Too late to suppress turnout.
I think Russias mischief-making ability is limited at the moment.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)Mike 03
(16,616 posts)an election again. I don't understand why it's not an Act of War to attack another nation's election.
There's been something I've wanted to dig out of a book I read a couple of years ago. I think it's in Greg Miller's book The Apprentice but I'm not 100% sure, which is why I never posted it. But somewhere I read that when Obama was president our intelligence agencies installed some cybernetic programs in Russia's infrastructure, but they have never been used. I want to find the exact paragraph before I go further.
Did anybody else read The Apprentice by Greg Miller? Does what I'm saying ring a bell?
empedocles
(15,751 posts)generating among the populace, fear and distrust beyond the Election. Most immediately it would help trump, despite losing the vote, in claiming 'rigging' etc. and fighting to stay in the WH. In the bigger picture, even reliable institutions like hospitals could be paralyzed, creating still more fear/distrust/hopelessness.
Cyberwarfare is here to stay for the forseeable future.
Response to empedocles (Original post)
Baked Potato This message was self-deleted by its author.