General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAre busy polling places today a good thing?
I'm seeing posts from people who are all excited about the in-person voter turnout they're seeing today... but since in-person voting is heavily tilted Republican this year, is that really a good thing?
I still think we're in a very strong position regardless, but unless I'm missing something, I'd think people would be happier to see uncrowded polling places today.
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)But Im a worrier
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)thing. Same with ANY large URBAN areas
frazzled
(18,402 posts)because it's an overwhelmingly blue city in a solidly blue state. It won't change the electoral outcome, but it would mean we're running up the popular-vote tally big time.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)That's just a theory. Heavy turnout in blue areas is a GOOD thing. Heavy turnout in rural areas, not so good.
SoonerPride
(12,286 posts)It is encouraging to see long lines everywhere.
Silent3
(15,210 posts)There's no room in my heart for the "gosh, isn't it wonderful that everyone is participating, no matter who they vote for!" sentiment.
Fahrenthold451
(436 posts)Very rare for rural counties to have long lines in any circumstances because many more precinct per voter. So reports of long lines are almost always urban reports.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)Amishman
(5,557 posts)In my rural red corner of PA, I'd never seen the line this long.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)That will vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.
The 2020 election is going to be a unique one, due to the huge early vote and heavy turnout on election day. Unless someone is doing exit polling, we won't know who is voting today in any detail.
We'll all just have to wait and see.
Whiskeytide
(4,461 posts)... 5 or 6 texts Ive gotten from friends. Ive never had more than 15-20 people ahead of me, and there were 200+ this morning.
Anecdotally the demographics looked good. A lot of young people and POC. And a lot of blue shirts??
Alabama doesnt have early voting, so lines were expected. And Тяцмр is still going to win here easily. But it wouldnt surprise me to see Biden perform better this time than Dems have in the past. And Im hoping its a good omen for Doug Jones.
crickets
(25,969 posts)Whiskeytide
(4,461 posts)... and an inferiority complex would be better for Alabama than one for the thumb Tubby. Oh, and Roll Tide!
Rice4VP
(1,235 posts)bullimiami
(13,086 posts)would there be more motivation for trump this year without hillary and the record of the last 4 years?
or has trump support gotten more concentrated and more vocal?
i want to think trump will get less support this year rather than more.
RainCaster
(10,870 posts)Plus, all the ratfucking the GOP has been doing means that there will be more Dems filling up the lines to vote today. So those Trumpanzees will have to wait in lines with masks.
Silent3
(15,210 posts)...there's no room in my heart for the "gosh, isn't it wonderful that everyone is participating, no matter who they vote for!" sentiment.
A big Biden win and control over the Senate is all I want. I'd be quite happy for anyone stupid and/or nasty enough to support Trump to not vote at all.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)When Donald Trump starts flying around the country by flapping his arms, and shooting laser beams out of his eyes, he'll disintegrate large clusters of voters all at once. So clearly, people should stay away from the polls.
Tom Rinaldo
(22,912 posts)If almost no one went to the polls and voted in person today, Democrats would be the clear victors because we mobilized folks to vote early by mail etc. But that was never going to happen, lots of people will vote today, So...
It depends. If the reason why Election Day voting is robust is because a lot of Democrats were left to go to the polls today to add to the large number of Republicans going to the polls today, than long lines might be good. That would mean that the Republican margin of victory for Election Day voting will not be large enough to overcome the banked advantage that Democrats already have. If, however, almost all of the Democrats who intend to vote had already voted prior to Election Day, than obviously long lines today would be a negative indicator for us.
I prefer to be optimistic. I believe plenty of Democrats are showing up to vote today along with the Republicans who always intended to wait for today to vote, which would explain long lines. If that is true we will get our landslide.
crickets
(25,969 posts)honest.abe
(8,678 posts)There are a ton of Democrats who dont vote every election for whatever reason.. too busy, not inspired, don't really like the Dem candidate, difficult to get to polling place, bad weather, etc, etc, etc. This year, throwing Trump out the White House is a huge inspiration to all Democrats no matter what and people are showing up.
The pollsters may not have picked up on this group of voters since they may have waited until the last minute to register or also were not sure they were going to vote until the last minute.
Also, the golden rule has always been the more votes, the more Democrats win. I see no reason for that to change this year.
Ms. Toad
(34,069 posts)My republican counterpart is discouraged. She's checking the 11:00 voting list. Out of the 75 or so she checked, 3 were republican.
Very light turnout, aside from the line waiting at open. (Tons voted in this predominately AA community)
jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)Republicans spend countless energy trying to shrink the electorate and make it harder to vote.
Silent3
(15,210 posts)But if voting has been significantly self-sorted already, with Democrats voting heavily by mail and by early voting, and Republicans voting heavily in-person on election day itself, you can't safely apply the broad rule "more voting is good for Democrats" to the voting done by that self-sorted segment of voters likely to be mostly Republican.
To re-emphasize what I initially said, I'm still pretty bullish regardless about Biden's prospects, and Democrats down-ticket too. I only commented to say it seemed strange to me that people would specifically be heartened to see a lot of turnout today -- except, perhaps, if they're seeing it in strongly Democratic areas.