Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMissouri poll worker showed up for work on Election Day after testing positive for coronavirus
Link to tweet
Tweet text:
BNO Newsroom
@BNODesk
NEW: Missouri poll worker showed up for work on Election Day after testing positive for coronavirus; the worker has since died https://sccmo.org/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=1648
1:43 PM · Nov 5, 2020
BNO Newsroom
@BNODesk
NEW: Missouri poll worker showed up for work on Election Day after testing positive for coronavirus; the worker has since died https://sccmo.org/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=1648
1:43 PM · Nov 5, 2020
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 623 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Missouri poll worker showed up for work on Election Day after testing positive for coronavirus (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Nov 2020
OP
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)1. Yikes
samnsara
(17,622 posts)2. they went from working to dead in 2 days??? heavy viral load!
MissB
(15,806 posts)3. Yeah. And exhaustion.
Hopefully no one else caught it from the poll worker.
Tanuki
(14,918 posts)4. What was he/she thinking?
But it is a stark reminder that any time one is out in public, there could be someone present who is either unaware that they are covid-positive, or well aware but ignoring quarantine guidance for selfish/personal reasons. Be safe, y'all!
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)6. It is possible that the person didn't know about the positive test.
When I worked in corporate America, I went to work sick often, not a smart choice, but I did. Now, if I feel sick, I would immediately stop all public functions and call my primary care Doctors office.
Tanuki
(14,918 posts)7. Per the OP article:
..."received a positive test result for COVID-19 on Oct. 30 from a private lab and was advised by the lab to quarantine for 14 days. The election judge nevertheless failed to follow the advice and worked at the Countys Precinct 41 at the Blanchette Park Memorial Hall polling site in St. Charles on Election Day. "
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)9. I hope the person didn't essentially kill someone else. nt
Tanuki
(14,918 posts)5. Holy Shit! Remember this, from the same county? From Sept. 16:
https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/act-surprised-that-you-don-t-have-a-face-mask-on-st-charles-county-tells/article_39335fa9-369b-5053-a009-180f27da977b.html
"ST. CHARLES COUNTY Election officials here on Wednesday suggested poll workers act surprised if voters ask why they arent wearing masks.
The email sent at about 11 a.m. from the St. Charles County Election Authority told poll workers they would not be required to wear a mask on Nov. 3, but would have to keep one handy and put it on if a voter asks.
But, in announcing the policy, the email suggested poll workers confronted by voters about their masks to act surprised.
You may act surprised that you dont have a face mask on properly and then apologize as you put the mask on, an Election Authority recruiter wrote in the email. Wear your mask correctly until the voter leaves the polling place. Please do this every time a voter says something to you.
Critics of the emails instructions were misinterpreting it, said Kurt Bahr, director of elections for the St. Charles County Election Authority, after the office received complaints about the directive.
The directive to act surprised was meant to give poll workers a way to quickly acknowledge that they werent wearing the mask, if confronted by voters, put it on and then continue with administering elections, Bahr said.
We missed the mark in what we were intending to communicate, Bahr said.
The goal is to say to put the mask on without arguing and then move on, he said. We used the word act surprised, but we could have said act apologetic.
The policy requires poll workers to wear a mask on their ear or a lanyard somewhere visible and accessible and put it on fully if a voter asks, Bahr said. Thats a change he instituted from earlier in the year, when poll workers were only highly encouraged to wear masks, he said.
Workers will be required to wear a mask if a voter mentions it in any general sense, Bahr said. There is no specific phrase or question a voter has to ask for a poll worker to put a mask on.
I trust that they will use their best judgment to recognize that if theyre asked to wear a mask, that they put one on, he said."
"ST. CHARLES COUNTY Election officials here on Wednesday suggested poll workers act surprised if voters ask why they arent wearing masks.
The email sent at about 11 a.m. from the St. Charles County Election Authority told poll workers they would not be required to wear a mask on Nov. 3, but would have to keep one handy and put it on if a voter asks.
But, in announcing the policy, the email suggested poll workers confronted by voters about their masks to act surprised.
You may act surprised that you dont have a face mask on properly and then apologize as you put the mask on, an Election Authority recruiter wrote in the email. Wear your mask correctly until the voter leaves the polling place. Please do this every time a voter says something to you.
Critics of the emails instructions were misinterpreting it, said Kurt Bahr, director of elections for the St. Charles County Election Authority, after the office received complaints about the directive.
The directive to act surprised was meant to give poll workers a way to quickly acknowledge that they werent wearing the mask, if confronted by voters, put it on and then continue with administering elections, Bahr said.
We missed the mark in what we were intending to communicate, Bahr said.
The goal is to say to put the mask on without arguing and then move on, he said. We used the word act surprised, but we could have said act apologetic.
The policy requires poll workers to wear a mask on their ear or a lanyard somewhere visible and accessible and put it on fully if a voter asks, Bahr said. Thats a change he instituted from earlier in the year, when poll workers were only highly encouraged to wear masks, he said.
Workers will be required to wear a mask if a voter mentions it in any general sense, Bahr said. There is no specific phrase or question a voter has to ask for a poll worker to put a mask on.
I trust that they will use their best judgment to recognize that if theyre asked to wear a mask, that they put one on, he said."
ffr
(22,669 posts)8. When was election day?