There are just too many threads to read all of DU threads and posts. I was well aware of Giuliani's impending press conference (even posted a reply in a thread to alert a poster about it coming up) and that there was some mixup about a landscaping company, but nothing I read or saw mentioned the businesses the OP highlighted.
Plus I don't have a TV. Does that make me bad?
I don't follow tweets, I follow DU links to tweets. Is that incorrect behaviour? I saw the Hoarse Whisperer thread early in the thread but the context there was tRump's Non-Existent Health Care Plan. I had no idea that later you had buried posts about the press conference in that thread.
I'm clued in, but not glued in to TV, twitter, or even DU. I read DU a lot, but nobody can be expected to read it comprehensively.
There are too many threads, partly because of context-free OPs and click bait titles and obscure "This" threads. A little pushback is healthy.
It's seems so simple to offer a little context in an OP. The attention grabbing thread title is fine and good practice. But what was so difficult about mentioning "Giuliani press conference" in the OP? A little thought and care for DU readers goes a long way.
= new reply since forum marked as read
