General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRep. James Clyburn on @MeetThePress: "Defund the police" cost Democrats in House and Senate races.
Link to tweet
bullimiami
(13,111 posts)nobody. just like scary socialism.
stop blaming the victims. you should know better.
getagrip_already
(14,932 posts)They are our own radical fringe.
bullimiami
(13,111 posts)getagrip_already
(14,932 posts)See post 7 below.
Budi
(15,325 posts)as well as Sirota, & Brianha JGrey & the meme was pushed relentlessly.
You could not argue a point of sensibility with them.
Defund the police was indeed an extremist & divisive meme pushed by the same group that runs opposite to everything unifying & reasonable.
It was a stupid thing to do.
lapucelle
(18,377 posts)It hurt us in congressional and state assembly races here in NY.
No one is blaming the Democrats who lost their races because they got saddled with a narrative that Republicans seized upon to define our party.
https://www.ocasiocortez.com/issues
FoxNewsSucks
(10,435 posts)but it is after clicking through a few pages. It's also after a clear explanation of the support for diverting some of the police budget to people-issues.
She really should change the term there, and go with "de-militarize". Because that's the actual problem with most police departments.
lapucelle
(18,377 posts)Though the plan proposed by New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio (D) cuts one-sixth of the New York Police Department (NYPD) budget, activists note that much of it would be transferred to other city departments, including the Department of Education, where it could pay for police in schools. Activists have advocated for removing officers from schools altogether.
Defunding police means defunding police, the congresswoman said in a statement. It does not mean budget tricks or funny math. It does not mean moving school police officers from the NYPD budget to the Department of Educations budget so the exact same police remain in schools.
snip==========================================================================================
It does not mean counting overtime cuts as cuts, even as NYPD ignores every attempt by City Council to curb overtime spending and overspends on overtime anyways, Ocasio-Cortez said. If these reports are accurate, then these proposed cuts to the NYPD budget are a disingenuous illusion. This is not a victory. The fight to defund policing continues.
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/505307-ocasio-cortez-dismisses-proposed-1b-cut-defunding-police-means-defunding
Budi
(15,325 posts)We're lucky we didn't lose more seats because of their screeches of revoluuuushion
Their entire schtick is division of the Democratic moderate center.
This actually falls in line with the ideology of Cenk, Sirota & those who orginated the JD's.
I have no idea wtf they really want anymore.
Except to divide the Dem Party.
And what they propose in its place is a weakening of our Democratic Republic.
Ask the Republucan Party how well the Tea Party turned out for them. 3rd party extremism is the unbalancing of a government. So Gtfoh
A Moderate Center is the only way to govern a fair & just society.
Defund the police was a stupid social media meme, meant to divide & harm.
getagrip_already
(14,932 posts)But at certain first term reps who stoked this bs.
It was about the dumbest phrase you could use. Even people who hate police abuse gnerally like police when they do a good job.
msongs
(67,473 posts)The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)msongs
(67,473 posts)Raven123
(4,917 posts)They need to monitor all information traffic that misinforms, inflames or uses language that can be misinterpreted. They need a rapid response team to counter ASAP.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,169 posts)nt.
Owl
(3,646 posts)Response to George II (Original post)
getagrip_already This message was self-deleted by its author.
NoMoreRepugs
(9,499 posts)we have to respond better and win the war of words.
Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)Truth be told, when people say "Defund the Police", a significant portion of the population get scared real fast and Republicans play off that fear.
It's about wording and democrats are bad at it...
Pisces
(5,602 posts)Allow these 3 words to define the movement and put us on offense on explaining the meeting. If you need to explain you are losing!!!!
Budi
(15,325 posts)And it did just that.
Indykatie
(3,697 posts)The far left needs to consider how their messaging and choice of words impact the Dem party. Republicans latched on to it and used it to their advantage. The Media loves drama so they amplified the cry despite Biden's clear response that he didn't respond.
Spazito
(50,559 posts)I don't know how many people I had to explain to that the intent was to reform the police via reallocations of funding and not defunding them and these people were on the left not the right.
Ferrets are Cool
(21,112 posts)and yet, they used it against us in almost every ad. They LIE, LIE, and LIE and they still lose. FUCK UM.
SharonClark
(10,014 posts)Baked Potato
(7,733 posts)Last edited Mon Nov 9, 2020, 12:31 AM - Edit history (1)
It plays directly to Trump-Republican propaganda.
Edit: I dont mean discussions here. I mean by our politicians.
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,601 posts)It was like Hillary calling Trump supporters "deplorables." I understand "defund the police" to mean "reallocate a portion of public resources from enforcement to prevention." That's too subtle a concept to turn into a chant, however, so we're handing the Repugs a weapon to use against us.
Response to George II (Original post)
Celerity This message was self-deleted by its author.
lapucelle
(18,377 posts)Response to lapucelle (Reply #32)
Celerity This message was self-deleted by its author.
lapucelle
(18,377 posts)There is a pandemic and its concomitant complexities to deal with, and there was an election to win.
I've never heard of the Shorefront News, but one thing seems clear: they certainly wanted to Rose vote against impeachment, but he was too "weak" to act in his own self interest! He is in the clutches of Speaker Pelosi!
Had Rose taken a stance and voted against impeachment, he wouldve been a shoe-in today. He didnt, choosing instead to go on MSNBC to attack the Presidents very clear obstruction and now despite being an incumbent, he finds himself in the position of an underdog trying to claw back.
snip================================================================
The full stories at the embedded links are worth reading for context and a fuller understanding of Rose's record, challenges. as well as for some insight into the journalistic integrity of a source that spins a Republican narrative out of decontextualized whole cloth.
Response to lapucelle (Reply #35)
Celerity This message was self-deleted by its author.
lapucelle
(18,377 posts)SHEEPSHEAD BAY A mysterious website that sprang up a few weeks ago reporting on Southern Brooklyn belongs to former State Sen. David Storobin, Bklyner has learned.
snip=============================================================================================
Hes not running, according to Nelson.
There are no bylines. When asked why the site doesnt name their reporters, Storobin responded, No reason.
snip========================================================================================
snip============================================================================================
https://bklyner.com/the-man-behind-the-mysterious-news-website-revealed/
*************************************************************************************************
*************************************************************************************************
Response to lapucelle (Reply #37)
Celerity This message was self-deleted by its author.
lapucelle
(18,377 posts)is always bad-mouthing him doesn't count as slamming his opponent for hating President Trump.
Using a Tea Party Republican's website and then pivoting to decontextualized, highly misleading Republican attack ads in an effort to tar a sitting Democrat is troubling at best.
************************************************************************************************
***********************************************************************************************
President Obama understood the unique challenges that district holds for Democrats. That's why he endorsed Max Rose.
**************************************************************************************************
Link to tweet
**************************************************************************************************
I'm glad I asked for a source. It was revealing on many levels.
Response to lapucelle (Reply #39)
Celerity This message was self-deleted by its author.
lapucelle
(18,377 posts)and his quotes where misleading and decontextualized. It is not I who embraced Republican framing in an attempt to tar a Democrat.
I didn't want the Trump-endorsed candidate to win that congressional seat. I was rooting for the Obama-endorsed Democratic incumbent, Max Rose.
Sorry if the type of Democrat who can win in that district wasn't pure enough. Now we'll have a Republican
Response to lapucelle (Reply #41)
Celerity This message was self-deleted by its author.
lapucelle
(18,377 posts)and then deleted, all Max Rose had to do to win re-election was to vote against impeachment and keep his mouth shut about Amy Coney Barrett. Democrat Max Rose did neither.
Max Rose did let his constituents know that he stood with Trump when he announced that an Iranian terrorist had been killed and when he signed a proclamation condemning antisemitism on college campuses.
The stands against terrorism, antisemitism, and Amy Coney Barrett and in favor of impeachment were all instances where Rose put principle above personal ambition and or purely partisan gamesmanship. Wanting to distance himself from democraticsocialists and distinguish himself as a Democrat who listens to and respects his constituents is not "running a terrible campaign".
When "analysis" includes Tea Party sources that misrepresent or ignore the context and totality of statements or a record, the conclusions are bound to be dubious, however often partial "facts" are repeated or from whatever source they are being lifted and decontextualized. Adopting and amplifying the extreme right wing framing of any Democrat's record is a Republican game.
Caveat lector.
Response to lapucelle (Reply #47)
Celerity This message was self-deleted by its author.
George II
(67,782 posts)FoxNewsSucks
(10,435 posts)did Clyburn make it clear that the phrase "defund the police" is a rightwing thing and that democrats do NOT want to eliminate police departments? Despite the lie the right keeps pushing?
TwilightZone
(25,509 posts)Though, after her initial support (noted in this thread), she seems to be running from it now that it's proven to be a political liability.
Smart move, that.
BainsBane
(53,097 posts)Leftists use it all the time. It's bad messaging.
Hyper_Eye
(675 posts)If you have to explain a slogan it's a bad slogan. That's especially true if you have to explain why it doesn't mean what the words imply. I hated it from the first time I saw it.
betsuni
(25,746 posts)BainsBane
(53,097 posts)not reforms.
George II
(67,782 posts)....who really do mean defund the police, i.e. disband them altogether.
triron
(22,028 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Demsrule86
(68,758 posts)one. We are center left Demographics won't save us; we need a 50 state strategy in order to win Senate seats,house seats, local government and of course the presidency.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)honest.abe
(8,688 posts)I think your comment should be in reverse.