Barr authorizes DOJ to probe 'substantial allegations' of voting irregularities

[Nevilledog]

Link to tweet

[Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin]

1. Fishing expedition

[soothsayer]

3. It's more of "we're investigating Hillary's emails"

It’s just a ploy to make it sound like there’s “there” there (IMO)

[Dem2]

2. Likely find Republicans

...and the investigation will "turn up nothing"

(this is just for Rumps edification, BTW, there's nothing that will come of this.)

[Doodley]

4. I am convinced Trump will refuse to leave office and Barr will back him.

[JHB]

9. They'll need more than that...

...since on Jan. 20 Trump stops being president and Joe can summarily fire Barr.

[napi21]

5. He's apeasing his boss. Trying toescape the "twitter axe" I'm sure. n/t

[jls4561]

6. Start with that guy who told NC voters to vote twice.

[lpbk2713]

7. Just because Limbaugh says so doesn't make it *substantial*.

Barr is embarrassing himself.

[LAS14]

8. He's covering himself. He's not saying there ARE substantial allegations. It's almost like...

.. defying Trump. But that couldn't be. Right?

tia
las

[ret5hd]

10. Just sayin...I'm still a bit worried:

https://democraticunderground.com/100214510239

[keithbvadu2]

11. "Substantial" is somewhat vague... Try 'credible'.

"Substantial" is somewhat vague... Try 'credible'.

[Me.]

12. Maybe He Should Put Durham On It