General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsklook
(12,171 posts)#EmbraceTheBase cool!
progressoid
(50,002 posts)Blue Owl
(50,535 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Bettie
(16,138 posts)is going to is right on it. They are all working for those senate races in GA.
Demsrule86
(68,735 posts)DU I know exactly where that money goes. I am donating to the candidates.
George II
(67,782 posts)...the credit card company (I thought they were supposed to be demons?) takes their cut*.
Then they get divvied up between the four, five, or six different organizations - each with their one administrative and overhead costs.
Spitballing it, perhaps $250-260K actually goes to the work of those organizations.
Then we have the work that the organizations will wind up doing. How much of that will go toward actually helping Warnock or Ossoff? Will they be doing what the two campaigns need or is it duplicate work?
As for me, I prefer contributing directly to campaigns and cut out the middle man and organizations that might not be concentrated on the efforts that Warnock and Ossoff need or want.
melman
(7,681 posts)That's an interesting take.
Bettie
(16,138 posts)Support Stacy Abrams' organization, well, except....not really.
George II
(67,782 posts)melman
(7,681 posts)You said people should donate to candidates directly because "these organizations" might not be doing the right things.
George II
(67,782 posts)....and offensive.
THIS is what I said, nothing like what you're accusing me of saying.
Please, if you want to "quote" me, use my EXACT quote! You might want to reread my post, understand what I really said, and apologize. I won't hold my breath.
George II
(67,782 posts)I may just do that myself because that goes directly to Stacey Abrams' effort to get people registered to vote and other positive voting issues in Georgia.
Accusing me of saying it's bad to donate to them is, in your words, "an interesting take" and in my words, insulting.
Response to George II (Reply #16)
melman This message was self-deleted by its author.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)That's an interesting take, indeed. But not inconsistent, given what we read...
Dem4Life1102
(3,974 posts)and they used Act Blue too. Are you saying that the Biden campaign did something wrong by using them?
George II
(67,782 posts)I've used ActBlue myself because it's convenient. I contributed to Biden's campaign 15 times, but each time I give a few bucks more than I normally would have so that they get what I intended to give to them.
On the other hand, if someone wants the full amount to go to the campaign, a check is a much better way of doing it, although there is a few days' delay.
Plus, giving directly to the campaign, either by check or via ActBlue, they don't have to override a pre-determined group of organizations that will "split" the contribution.
Dem4Life1102
(3,974 posts)Do you have links that verify that they take a cut?
George II
(67,782 posts)Dem4Life1102
(3,974 posts)Demsrule86
(68,735 posts)Glad money is being raised... some of the comments on the thread were interesting. I want every penny to go to the candidates.
yellowdogintexas
(22,282 posts)Both of them have ActBlue links.
Demsrule86
(68,735 posts)recently as hubs and I were unemployed. Hubs got a good job...so we are OK...rough out there.
George II
(67,782 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Good question. In the past, I've seen donation requests being made by high-profile politicians... but if you looked carefully and read all the small print, it turned out that the donation was being split in such a way that not ALL of it went directly to the headlined candidates or cause. Most of it did go toward the intended recipient, but the whole thing just hit me wrong. I thought it was a bit unseemly that ANY amount would be diverted. Like a loan-shark's vig, or an Ebay commission, or a PayPal transaction fee. Yuk!
All I'm trying to say is that it's just impossible to know for sure where a donation goes, and how it's handled and divided. That's why I'll always donate DIRECTLY to whatever candidate or group I'm supporting. I just don't want to take a chance with third-party collectors. Why would I want to contribute to their overhead costs?
Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,507 posts)theaocp
(4,245 posts)fishwax
(29,149 posts)It's been thanks to the work of these organizations (Fair Fight, most notably) that Biden won Georgia and we're within striking distance of controlling the senate.
Raising funds for these organizations is a worthy use of one's time and social capital.
Donating to these organizations is a worthy use of one's money, if you've got it to spare.
Donating to the campaigns directly is also a worthy use of one's money, if you've got it to spare.
(Complaining about a democrat raising funds for these organizations doesn't strike me as a worthy use of one's time, but YMMV.)
tonedevil
(3,022 posts)I am astounded, but never surprised by the vitriol that is unleashed when you post anything about AOC.
MoonlitKnight
(1,584 posts)Good for her. It should generate donations that would not have happened otherwise.
Most of us here know how and who to donate directly. We can do so.
If you dont like credit card processing fees then send a check. But there is overhead sending a check.
CottonBear
(21,597 posts)demmiblue
(36,907 posts)Apparently, some people need a new hobby.
Celerity
(43,635 posts)questionseverything
(9,665 posts)To help us all
😉