Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(51,260 posts)
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 04:57 PM Nov 2020

Laurie Garrett: I'm in a zoom mtg now w/top Trump advisor: - Says he ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT concede



Tweet text:
Laurie Garrett
@Laurie_Garrett
I'm in a zoom mtg now w/top #Trump advisor:
- Says he ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT concede
- few legal options right now to contest
- Electoral College is next target: claims there are "faithless electors" who can be turned for 20 states. Working on it now.
Electors meet Dec 14th.
1:46 PM · Nov 12, 2020
40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Laurie Garrett: I'm in a zoom mtg now w/top Trump advisor: - Says he ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT concede (Original Post) Nevilledog Nov 2020 OP
So... coup it is then? Zoonart Nov 2020 #1
He's nuts soothsayer Nov 2020 #2
Yeah, but: mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2020 #3
+1 2naSalit Nov 2020 #39
They are going the threaten and bribe electors C_U_L8R Nov 2020 #4
wasnt there a court decision regarding faithless electors? samnsara Nov 2020 #5
Yes. mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2020 #13
Who Gives A SHITE!!!!! Cha Nov 2020 #6
This will not happen. madaboutharry Nov 2020 #7
Their attitude from day one has been Zoonart Nov 2020 #11
Their attitude has been that since at least 1994 JHB Nov 2020 #27
This isn't Biden's first rodeo..you really think he's going to just sit back and let that happen Thekaspervote Nov 2020 #37
36 pledged Biden electors? exboyfil Nov 2020 #8
From the Limited bullet points listed, it's not 100% clear what's proposed GopherGal Nov 2020 #34
He is already doing #1 but that is not faithless electors exboyfil Nov 2020 #35
yes, they're likely trying both. GopherGal Nov 2020 #38
This has been beaten to death here...please stop! Thekaspervote Nov 2020 #36
"Top trump advisor"... Spazito Nov 2020 #9
The million lies he's had before PROVES bluestarone Nov 2020 #10
I'll wait to get some more detail from her... brooklynite Nov 2020 #12
It does seem he is going after the strongest and not the weakest link exboyfil Nov 2020 #19
what does faithless electors mean? brettdale Nov 2020 #14
You are actually voting for a group exboyfil Nov 2020 #23
I don't give a fuck if he concedes. SamKnause Nov 2020 #15
I want him charged with sedition. sinkingfeeling Nov 2020 #16
In Michigan the electors will have be handpicked by Democrats Kaleva Nov 2020 #17
Garrett should be too smart to spread misinformation about electors Fiendish Thingy Nov 2020 #18
It would be like the delegation for a state in the Democratic National Convention greenjar_01 Nov 2020 #20
Exactly Blecht Nov 2020 #33
She's just reporting what she heard them say they'd do. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2020 #21
Good luck with that malaise Nov 2020 #22
He'll conceded before then...maybe even soon. Especially if their "We Lost" march Lucinda Nov 2020 #24
His consession is not necessary. Means nothing. Nt Progressive Jones Nov 2020 #25
He is going to pull every trick in the book while he is running out the clock. FM123 Nov 2020 #26
Keep those MAGAt contributions rolling in a little longer, Donny. KY_EnviroGuy Nov 2020 #28
Consensus of those listening in was: Meaningless humoring of Trump's ego. brooklynite Nov 2020 #29
Anyone who think they can turn electors into "faithless electors" PoindexterOglethorpe Nov 2020 #30
In 29 states (and DC) the electors are bound to whoever won the state SomedayKindaLove Nov 2020 #31
Trump's word is without value. lpbk2713 Nov 2020 #32
Here are the electors reportedly selected by Democrats here in PA BumRushDaShow Nov 2020 #40

madaboutharry

(40,244 posts)
7. This will not happen.
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 05:01 PM
Nov 2020

It is bullshit. I'm surprised she didn't "leave the meeting."

Does anyone, and I mean anyone, think that Trump will get away with a coup? I do not believe the American people will say "OK, sure forget that you lost, you can still be president."



Thekaspervote

(32,817 posts)
37. This isn't Biden's first rodeo..you really think he's going to just sit back and let that happen
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 06:33 PM
Nov 2020

Yes, he will absolutely do something about it

exboyfil

(17,865 posts)
8. 36 pledged Biden electors?
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 05:02 PM
Nov 2020

I prefer him trying to attack that instead of attacking the legislators to pick the slate of electors. It is very good if he has given up on attacking vote totals.

In any event the GOP should work with the Democrats to remove him before he destroys the whole country. They won't being the craven individuals that they are.

GopherGal

(2,010 posts)
34. From the Limited bullet points listed, it's not 100% clear what's proposed
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 05:58 PM
Nov 2020

But I think the attack on the "electors" can come at two spots:
1) challenge/corrupt the states' appointment of electors
2) "turn" some duly chosen democratic electors.

#1 creates a whole legislative/legal/court mess (a favorable-to-him resolution of which Hair Furor may be counting on from his court packing). But the ReThugs' MO has been "commit the crime, they can't stop me until it's done"

#2 counts on some democratic electors being willing to commit political suicide by voting for Hair Furor. Then again, there may prove to be some Sarandon-dems who are just too pure and non-conformist to skip their chance to disrupt the system.

Ah, looks like the Washington Post sees the same two possibilities
[link:https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/12/could-electoral-college-be-stolen-biden/|]

exboyfil

(17,865 posts)
35. He is already doing #1 but that is not faithless electors
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 06:04 PM
Nov 2020

I don't know if the explanation to the reporter was wrong, or she got it wrong. Probably they are trying both. Get PA and another state kicked out (MI? or WI?). Then go to work on the individual electors if they can't get another state.

I wish Al Gore had thought of that in 2000. He would have only had to flip 3 and he would have had some justification for doing it (the popular vote winner).

GopherGal

(2,010 posts)
38. yes, they're likely trying both.
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 06:38 PM
Nov 2020

From the WaPo article I linked above, regarding the "convince enough electors to switch their votes" option:


But if the Republican Party is considering far-fetched possibilities, let’s run down this one. It’s even more unlikely than the first.


and goes on to quote:
“Altogether, there have been 23,507 electoral votes counted across 58 presidential elections,” says the nonpartisan voting advocacy group Fair Vote. “Only 90 electors have cast ‘deviant’ votes.”


Thats 0.38%.

Thekaspervote

(32,817 posts)
36. This has been beaten to death here...please stop!
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 06:30 PM
Nov 2020

The gop majority leaders of Pa and WI have both stated they will NOT overrule the popular vote or the will of the ppl of their states

https://whyy.org/articles/as-legal-challenges-fizzle-pa-gop-reaffirms-it-will-not-seek-to-override-popular-vote/

Fr M WI: They would effectively be nullifying the votes of the 3 million plus Wisconsinites," UW-Madison Law Professor Rob Yablon said.

He added that is not allowed under current Wisconsin law and can't see the Legislature trying to change it.

"The electors that were chosen on Election Day are legally bound to vote for the candidate that won the popular vote in Wisconsin," Yablon said. "And if the Legislature attempted to appoint its own substitute slate of electors, it's hard to see how that would be legitimate."

The Wisconsin Elections Commission agreed.

"In Wisconsin, the state Legislature plays no role in certifying or deciding which slate of electors vote in the Electoral College," the commission said in a statement to WISN 12 News.

Those electors "must vote for the candidates of the party that nominated them."

https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2020/07/14/supreme-courts-faithless-electors-decision-validates-case-for-the-national-popular-vote-interstate-compact/

exboyfil

(17,865 posts)
19. It does seem he is going after the strongest and not the weakest link
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 05:12 PM
Nov 2020

Flipping 36 Biden electors to get to a tie? How likely is that? We won't have a country left if he was successful, and I can't imagine how he would do it.

Gore would only have had to flip 3.

exboyfil

(17,865 posts)
23. You are actually voting for a group
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 05:14 PM
Nov 2020

in your state of electors who are representatives of the party and not the candidate himself/herself. These are the electoral votes. A faithless one is one pledged to a candidate who has won that elects not to vote for that candidate. Many state laws prevent that from happening and have various punishments including removal.

SamKnause

(13,113 posts)
15. I don't give a fuck if he concedes.
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 05:07 PM
Nov 2020

I don't want to hear a concession speech from him.

I just want him to get the fuck out.

You lost you anus mouthed evil fucker.

Fiendish Thingy

(15,696 posts)
18. Garrett should be too smart to spread misinformation about electors
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 05:10 PM
Nov 2020

Slates of electors are selected by the party/campaign. The appropriate slate is appointed to represent the state’s winner of the popular vote by the governor, and those electors vote on December 14.

No Biden elector is going to flip for Trump, period.

 

greenjar_01

(6,477 posts)
20. It would be like the delegation for a state in the Democratic National Convention
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 05:12 PM
Nov 2020

getting up and nominating the candidate from the other party.

They really are fleecing the morons at this point.

The electoral slate chosen by the Party is the hardest of the hardcore Party faithful and activists. The notion of faithless electors is archaic and silly.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,943 posts)
21. She's just reporting what she heard them say they'd do.
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 05:13 PM
Nov 2020

Doesn't mean they can actually do it, though they might try.

malaise

(269,253 posts)
22. Good luck with that
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 05:14 PM
Nov 2020
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19-465_i425.pdf

This fundamental allocation of power applies in the context of the electoral college. Article II, §1, and the Twelfth
Amendment address the election of the President through
a body of electors. These sections of the Constitution provide the Federal Government with limited powers concerning the election, set various requirements for the electors,
and impose an affirmative obligation on States to appoint
electors. Art. II, §1; Amdt. 12. Each of these directives is
consistent with the general structure of the Constitution
and the principle of reserved powers. See supra, at 9–10;
U. S. Term Limits, supra, at 863 (THOMAS, J., dissenting).
Put simply, nothing in the text or structure of Article II and
the Twelfth Amendment contradicts the fundamental distribution of power preserved by the Tenth Amendment.
Of course, the powers reserved to the States concerning
Presidential electors cannot “be exercised in such a way as
to violate express constitutional commands.” Williams v.

12 CHIAFALO v. WASHINGTON
THOMAS, J., concurring in judgment
Rhodes, 393 U. S. 23, 29 (1968). That is, powers related to
electors reside with States to the extent that the Constitution does not remove or restrict that power. Thus, to invalidate a state law, there must be “something in the Federal
Constitution that deprives the [States of] the power to enact
such [a] measur[e].” U. S. Term Limits, 514 U. S., at 850
(THOMAS, J., dissenting).
As the Court recognizes, nothing in the Constitution prevents States from requiring Presidential electors to vote for the candidate chosen by the people. Petitioners ask us to
infer a constitutional right to elector independence by interpreting the terms “appoint,” “Electors,” “vote,” and “by Ballot” to align with the Framers’ expectations of discretion in
elector voting. But the Framers’ expectations aid our interpretive inquiry only to the extent that they provide evidence of the original public meaning of the Constitution. They
cannot be used to change that meaning. As the Court explains, the plain meaning of the terms relied on by petitioners do not appear to “connote independent choice.” Ante, at
11. Thus, “the original expectation[s]” of the Framers as to
elector discretion provide “no reason for holding that the
power confided to the States by the Constitution has ceased
to exist.” McPherson, 146 U. S., at 36; see also ante, at 12–
13.
* * *
“The people of the States, from whom all governmental
powers stem, have specified that all powers not prohibited
to the States by the Federal Constitution are reserved ‘to
the States respectively, or to the people.’ ” U. S. Term Limits, supra, at 852 (THOMAS, J., dissenting). Because I would decide this case based on that fundamental principle, I concur only in the judgment.

Lucinda

(31,170 posts)
24. He'll conceded before then...maybe even soon. Especially if their "We Lost" march
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 05:14 PM
Nov 2020

tanks and it looks like it will - and it is looking that way online. I've seen barely any comments on social media account posts talking logistics and info...unless the GOP voters have moved en masse to Parler

FM123

(10,054 posts)
26. He is going to pull every trick in the book while he is running out the clock.
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 05:16 PM
Nov 2020

I don't have any confidence that his team can pull any of this off, they are not the well-oiled machine that Team Biden is.

KY_EnviroGuy

(14,498 posts)
28. Keep those MAGAt contributions rolling in a little longer, Donny.
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 05:19 PM
Nov 2020

Their daddy needs new golf clubs, has hundreds of lawyers to pay and he needs a new jet plane to escape in.

Grifters gotta grift......

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,925 posts)
30. Anyone who think they can turn electors into "faithless electors"
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 05:40 PM
Nov 2020

really does not understand how the system works.

SomedayKindaLove

(532 posts)
31. In 29 states (and DC) the electors are bound to whoever won the state
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 05:48 PM
Nov 2020
http://archive.fairvote.org/?page=967

Biden won states of Arizona, Georgia, Nevada and PA are not on the list. Maybe dude from Texas, Dan Patrick, can offer each elector who flips a million dollars

BumRushDaShow

(129,875 posts)
40. Here are the electors reportedly selected by Democrats here in PA
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 07:04 PM
Nov 2020
How Pa. chooses Electoral College voters and who are the 20 pledged to pick Joe Biden?

J.D. Prose, USA TODAY Network - PA State Capitol Bureau
Published 3:44 p.m. ET Nov. 11, 2020 | Updated 3:48 p.m. ET Nov. 11, 2020

With President Donald Trump and other Republican elected officials continuing to question former Vice President Joe Biden’s unofficial victory in Pennsylvania, attention is turning to the state’s 20 electoral votes and the people who have been picked to cast them.

Electoral College schedule

In Pennsylvania, each party's nominee chooses their Electoral College electors, and the winning candidate’s party submits its list to the governor to be certified. The electors will cast their votes for president on Dec. 14 in Harrisburg, and that result will then be sent to Congress by Dec. 23, said Kermit Roosevelt, a constitutional law professor at the University of Pennsylvania.

Congress is scheduled to meet in a joint session on Jan. 6 to count the electoral votes, and there can be objections, Roosevelt said, but they must be made by both a representative and a senator. If that were to occur, Roosevelt said the two houses would recess and separately debate whether to reject or accept the objection. Both the House and the Senate must agree to exclude an electoral vote, he said.

(snip)

The 20 Pennsylvania Democrats picked to be Electoral College elector

Nina Ahmad, Philadelphia County

Former deputy mayor for public engagement in Philadelphia

Val Arkoosh, Montgomery County

Chair of the Montgomery County Board of Commissioners

Cindy Bass, Philadelphia County

Member of the Philadelphia City Council

Rick Bloomingdale, Dauphin County

Pennsylvania AFL-CIO president

Ryan Boyer, Delaware County

Business Manager of Laborer’s International Union of North America Business Council

Paige Gebhardt Cognetti, Lackawanna County

Mayor of Scranton

Daisy Cruz, Philadelphia County

Mid-Atlantic director for 32BJ SEIU

Kathy Dahlkemper, Erie County

Erie County executive

Janet Diaz, Lancaster county

Lancaster City Council member

Virginia McGregor, Lackawanna County

Deputy National Finance Chair for the Democratic National Committee

Charles Hadley, Philadelphia County

Board member at Moberg Medical

Jordan Harris, Philadelphia County

Pa. House Democratic whip

Malcolm Kenyatta, Philadelphia County

State House member

Gerald Lawrence, Delaware County

Delaware County board of elections

Clifford Levine, Allegheny County

Attorney at Dentons Cohen & Grigsby

Nancy Mills, Allegheny County

Democratic National Committee member

Marian Moskowitz, Chester County

Chester County Commissioner

Josh Shapiro, Montgomery County

Pennsylvania Attorney General

Sharif Street, Philadelphia County

State senator

Connie Williams, Delaware County

Former state senator

A Pennsylvania Republican Party official did not immediately respond to a request for the names of its electors.


https://www.timesonline.com/story/news/2020/11/11/electoral-college-electors-pennsyslvania-election-popular-vote-results-joe-biden/6253260002/


NONE of these people are switching anytime soon!
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Laurie Garrett: I'm in a...