General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLaurie Garrett: I'm in a zoom mtg now w/top Trump advisor: - Says he ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT concede
Link to tweet
Laurie Garrett
@Laurie_Garrett
I'm in a zoom mtg now w/top #Trump advisor:
- Says he ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT concede
- few legal options right now to contest
- Electoral College is next target: claims there are "faithless electors" who can be turned for 20 states. Working on it now.
Electors meet Dec 14th.
1:46 PM · Nov 12, 2020
Zoonart
(11,896 posts)soothsayer
(38,601 posts)Or most likely fleecing the flock
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,712 posts)2naSalit
(86,889 posts)C_U_L8R
(45,031 posts)What fucksticks.
samnsara
(17,656 posts)mahatmakanejeeves
(57,712 posts)Cha
(297,926 posts)madaboutharry
(40,244 posts)It is bullshit. I'm surprised she didn't "leave the meeting."
Does anyone, and I mean anyone, think that Trump will get away with a coup? I do not believe the American people will say "OK, sure forget that you lost, you can still be president."
Zoonart
(11,896 posts)"What are you going to do about it?"
JHB
(37,163 posts)Thekaspervote
(32,817 posts)Yes, he will absolutely do something about it
exboyfil
(17,865 posts)I prefer him trying to attack that instead of attacking the legislators to pick the slate of electors. It is very good if he has given up on attacking vote totals.
In any event the GOP should work with the Democrats to remove him before he destroys the whole country. They won't being the craven individuals that they are.
GopherGal
(2,010 posts)But I think the attack on the "electors" can come at two spots:
1) challenge/corrupt the states' appointment of electors
2) "turn" some duly chosen democratic electors.
#1 creates a whole legislative/legal/court mess (a favorable-to-him resolution of which Hair Furor may be counting on from his court packing). But the ReThugs' MO has been "commit the crime, they can't stop me until it's done"
#2 counts on some democratic electors being willing to commit political suicide by voting for Hair Furor. Then again, there may prove to be some Sarandon-dems who are just too pure and non-conformist to skip their chance to disrupt the system.
Ah, looks like the Washington Post sees the same two possibilities
[link:https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/12/could-electoral-college-be-stolen-biden/|]
exboyfil
(17,865 posts)I don't know if the explanation to the reporter was wrong, or she got it wrong. Probably they are trying both. Get PA and another state kicked out (MI? or WI?). Then go to work on the individual electors if they can't get another state.
I wish Al Gore had thought of that in 2000. He would have only had to flip 3 and he would have had some justification for doing it (the popular vote winner).
GopherGal
(2,010 posts)From the WaPo article I linked above, regarding the "convince enough electors to switch their votes" option:
But if the Republican Party is considering far-fetched possibilities, lets run down this one. Its even more unlikely than the first.
and goes on to quote:
Thats 0.38%.
Thekaspervote
(32,817 posts)The gop majority leaders of Pa and WI have both stated they will NOT overrule the popular vote or the will of the ppl of their states
https://whyy.org/articles/as-legal-challenges-fizzle-pa-gop-reaffirms-it-will-not-seek-to-override-popular-vote/
Fr M WI: They would effectively be nullifying the votes of the 3 million plus Wisconsinites," UW-Madison Law Professor Rob Yablon said.
He added that is not allowed under current Wisconsin law and can't see the Legislature trying to change it.
"The electors that were chosen on Election Day are legally bound to vote for the candidate that won the popular vote in Wisconsin," Yablon said. "And if the Legislature attempted to appoint its own substitute slate of electors, it's hard to see how that would be legitimate."
The Wisconsin Elections Commission agreed.
"In Wisconsin, the state Legislature plays no role in certifying or deciding which slate of electors vote in the Electoral College," the commission said in a statement to WISN 12 News.
Those electors "must vote for the candidates of the party that nominated them."
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2020/07/14/supreme-courts-faithless-electors-decision-validates-case-for-the-national-popular-vote-interstate-compact/
Spazito
(50,563 posts)I'm betting on Stephen Miller or, 2nd place, Jared Kushner.
bluestarone
(17,101 posts)THIS is Number One Million and ONE!!
brooklynite
(94,901 posts)exboyfil
(17,865 posts)Flipping 36 Biden electors to get to a tie? How likely is that? We won't have a country left if he was successful, and I can't imagine how he would do it.
Gore would only have had to flip 3.
brettdale
(12,389 posts)what does faithless electors mean?
exboyfil
(17,865 posts)in your state of electors who are representatives of the party and not the candidate himself/herself. These are the electoral votes. A faithless one is one pledged to a candidate who has won that elects not to vote for that candidate. Many state laws prevent that from happening and have various punishments including removal.
SamKnause
(13,113 posts)I don't want to hear a concession speech from him.
I just want him to get the fuck out.
You lost you anus mouthed evil fucker.
sinkingfeeling
(51,487 posts)Kaleva
(36,382 posts)Very much doubt any can be "turned".
Fiendish Thingy
(15,696 posts)Slates of electors are selected by the party/campaign. The appropriate slate is appointed to represent the states winner of the popular vote by the governor, and those electors vote on December 14.
No Biden elector is going to flip for Trump, period.
greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)getting up and nominating the candidate from the other party.
They really are fleecing the morons at this point.
The electoral slate chosen by the Party is the hardest of the hardcore Party faithful and activists. The notion of faithless electors is archaic and silly.
Blecht
(3,803 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,943 posts)Doesn't mean they can actually do it, though they might try.
malaise
(269,253 posts)This fundamental allocation of power applies in the context of the electoral college. Article II, §1, and the Twelfth
Amendment address the election of the President through
a body of electors. These sections of the Constitution provide the Federal Government with limited powers concerning the election, set various requirements for the electors,
and impose an affirmative obligation on States to appoint
electors. Art. II, §1; Amdt. 12. Each of these directives is
consistent with the general structure of the Constitution
and the principle of reserved powers. See supra, at 910;
U. S. Term Limits, supra, at 863 (THOMAS, J., dissenting).
Put simply, nothing in the text or structure of Article II and
the Twelfth Amendment contradicts the fundamental distribution of power preserved by the Tenth Amendment.
Of course, the powers reserved to the States concerning
Presidential electors cannot be exercised in such a way as
to violate express constitutional commands. Williams v.
12 CHIAFALO v. WASHINGTON
THOMAS, J., concurring in judgment
Rhodes, 393 U. S. 23, 29 (1968). That is, powers related to
electors reside with States to the extent that the Constitution does not remove or restrict that power. Thus, to invalidate a state law, there must be something in the Federal
Constitution that deprives the [States of] the power to enact
such [a] measur[e]. U. S. Term Limits, 514 U. S., at 850
(THOMAS, J., dissenting).
As the Court recognizes, nothing in the Constitution prevents States from requiring Presidential electors to vote for the candidate chosen by the people. Petitioners ask us to
infer a constitutional right to elector independence by interpreting the terms appoint, Electors, vote, and by Ballot to align with the Framers expectations of discretion in
elector voting. But the Framers expectations aid our interpretive inquiry only to the extent that they provide evidence of the original public meaning of the Constitution. They
cannot be used to change that meaning. As the Court explains, the plain meaning of the terms relied on by petitioners do not appear to connote independent choice. Ante, at
11. Thus, the original expectation[s] of the Framers as to
elector discretion provide no reason for holding that the
power confided to the States by the Constitution has ceased
to exist. McPherson, 146 U. S., at 36; see also ante, at 12
13.
* * *
The people of the States, from whom all governmental
powers stem, have specified that all powers not prohibited
to the States by the Federal Constitution are reserved to
the States respectively, or to the people. U. S. Term Limits, supra, at 852 (THOMAS, J., dissenting). Because I would decide this case based on that fundamental principle, I concur only in the judgment.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)tanks and it looks like it will - and it is looking that way online. I've seen barely any comments on social media account posts talking logistics and info...unless the GOP voters have moved en masse to Parler
Progressive Jones
(6,011 posts)FM123
(10,054 posts)I don't have any confidence that his team can pull any of this off, they are not the well-oiled machine that Team Biden is.
KY_EnviroGuy
(14,498 posts)Their daddy needs new golf clubs, has hundreds of lawyers to pay and he needs a new jet plane to escape in.
Grifters gotta grift......
brooklynite
(94,901 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,925 posts)really does not understand how the system works.
SomedayKindaLove
(532 posts)Biden won states of Arizona, Georgia, Nevada and PA are not on the list. Maybe dude from Texas, Dan Patrick, can offer each elector who flips a million dollars
lpbk2713
(42,771 posts)He has flip-flopped before and he will do it again.
BumRushDaShow
(129,875 posts)J.D. Prose, USA TODAY Network - PA State Capitol Bureau
Published 3:44 p.m. ET Nov. 11, 2020 | Updated 3:48 p.m. ET Nov. 11, 2020
With President Donald Trump and other Republican elected officials continuing to question former Vice President Joe Bidens unofficial victory in Pennsylvania, attention is turning to the states 20 electoral votes and the people who have been picked to cast them.
Electoral College schedule
In Pennsylvania, each party's nominee chooses their Electoral College electors, and the winning candidates party submits its list to the governor to be certified. The electors will cast their votes for president on Dec. 14 in Harrisburg, and that result will then be sent to Congress by Dec. 23, said Kermit Roosevelt, a constitutional law professor at the University of Pennsylvania.
Congress is scheduled to meet in a joint session on Jan. 6 to count the electoral votes, and there can be objections, Roosevelt said, but they must be made by both a representative and a senator. If that were to occur, Roosevelt said the two houses would recess and separately debate whether to reject or accept the objection. Both the House and the Senate must agree to exclude an electoral vote, he said.
(snip)
The 20 Pennsylvania Democrats picked to be Electoral College elector
Nina Ahmad, Philadelphia County
Former deputy mayor for public engagement in Philadelphia
Val Arkoosh, Montgomery County
Chair of the Montgomery County Board of Commissioners
Cindy Bass, Philadelphia County
Member of the Philadelphia City Council
Rick Bloomingdale, Dauphin County
Pennsylvania AFL-CIO president
Ryan Boyer, Delaware County
Business Manager of Laborers International Union of North America Business Council
Paige Gebhardt Cognetti, Lackawanna County
Mayor of Scranton
Daisy Cruz, Philadelphia County
Mid-Atlantic director for 32BJ SEIU
Kathy Dahlkemper, Erie County
Erie County executive
Janet Diaz, Lancaster county
Lancaster City Council member
Virginia McGregor, Lackawanna County
Deputy National Finance Chair for the Democratic National Committee
Charles Hadley, Philadelphia County
Board member at Moberg Medical
Jordan Harris, Philadelphia County
Pa. House Democratic whip
Malcolm Kenyatta, Philadelphia County
State House member
Gerald Lawrence, Delaware County
Delaware County board of elections
Clifford Levine, Allegheny County
Attorney at Dentons Cohen & Grigsby
Nancy Mills, Allegheny County
Democratic National Committee member
Marian Moskowitz, Chester County
Chester County Commissioner
Josh Shapiro, Montgomery County
Pennsylvania Attorney General
Sharif Street, Philadelphia County
State senator
Connie Williams, Delaware County
Former state senator
A Pennsylvania Republican Party official did not immediately respond to a request for the names of its electors.
https://www.timesonline.com/story/news/2020/11/11/electoral-college-electors-pennsyslvania-election-popular-vote-results-joe-biden/6253260002/
NONE of these people are switching anytime soon!