General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRed state governors reject Biden on mask orders
President-elect Joe Biden says he'll personally call red state governors and persuade them to impose mask mandates to slow down the coronavirus pandemic. Their early response: Dont waste your time. Almost all of the 16 Republican governors who oppose statewide mask mandates are ready to reject Bidens plea, they told POLITICO or declared in public statements ...
South Dakotas Kristi Noem, Oklahomas Kevin Stitt and Nebraskas Pete Ricketts, whose states are engulfed by new cases, say mask wearing should remain a personal choice, not a legal obligation despite recommendations from health officials and updated guidance from the Centers for Disease Control stressing that masks protect the wearer, not just people nearby, from infection.
Governor Noem has provided her people with the full scope of the science, facts, and data regarding the virus, and then she has trusted them to exercise their personal responsibility to make the best decisions for themselves and their loved-ones, Noem spokesperson Ian Fury wrote in an email. She will not be changing that approach.
If President-elect Biden is indeed confirmed to be the next president, and he approaches me about a mask mandate, I would not be going along with a mask mandate, Ricketts said during a press briefing on Tuesday. As far as a mandate, Ive been very clear I dont think this its the right thing to do, Stitt, who was infected with the coronavirus earlier this year, said at a briefing on Tuesday. This is a personal responsibility."
Biden plans to implement a science-driven pandemic strategy as soon as hes sworn in, and has said that if governors arent receptive to his arguments, he will take the crusade to the local level by calling mayors and county leaders and urging them to enact mask orders.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/13/republican-governors-reject-biden-mask-orders-436385
Zoonart
(11,860 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,648 posts)jpak
(41,757 posts)From NY
Maybe they should think about this?
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)The ONLY reason they are doing this is because the single DUMBEST and most CORRUPT human on EARTH told them to.
That is the amazing part.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,956 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)Now we do science.
RainCaster
(10,870 posts)It sounds harsh, but it may be needed, as the pandemic rages on. More money could be allocated to states that abide the behavior mandates like masks, distancing, etc.
DonaldsRump
(7,715 posts)Kristi Noem, for example, is an idiot, and because of her stupidity, that should not affect law abiding folks elsewhere.
Most of these red states are net takers, rather than contributors, to the federal government's budget, so this is entirely fitting.
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)I would hold all the funding I could. These are mostly all taker states anyway.
DonaldsRump
(7,715 posts)to health insurance companies of these fools who do not wear masks, much like driving violations are reported to auto insurance companies. These RWNJs don't like "socialism", so why should law-abiding insureds have to subsidize these idiots' "constitutional rights" that will just drive up health care costs? Bottom line: if you don't wear a mask, you deal with all the problems that happen to you or others on health insurance plans by yourself: don't bother us with your illness. Isn't that exactly how you treat all other issues?
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)Vivienne235729
(3,384 posts)634-5789
(4,175 posts)Cha
(297,190 posts)flamingdem
(39,313 posts)due to the politics and stupidity of their leaders?
Let's just stop coddling toddlers
spanone
(135,830 posts)and have no regard for the lives of their constituents