Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NRaleighLiberal

(60,014 posts)
Mon Nov 16, 2020, 10:12 PM Nov 2020

NYT, Krugman "Why the 2020 Election Makes it Hard to be Optimistic About the Future"

If we can’t face up to a pandemic, how can we avoid apocalypse?

Paul Krugman
By Paul Krugman

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/16/opinion/coronavirus-climate.html

The 2020 election is over. And the big winners were the coronavirus and, quite possibly, catastrophic climate change. OK, democracy also won, at least for now. By defeating Donald Trump, Joe Biden pulled us back from the brink of authoritarian rule. But Trump paid less of a penalty than expected for his deadly failure to deal with Covid-19, and few down-ballot Republicans seem to have paid any penalty at all. As a headline in The Washington Post put it, “With pandemic raging, Republicans say election results validate their approach.” And their approach, in case you missed it, has been denial and a refusal to take even the most basic, low-cost precautions — like requiring that people wear masks in public.

The epidemiological consequences of this cynical irresponsibility will be ghastly. I’m not sure how many people realize just how terrible this winter is going to be. Deaths from Covid-19 tend to run around three weeks behind new cases; given the exponential growth in cases since the early fall, which hasn’t slowed at all, this means that we may be looking at a daily death toll in the thousands by the end of the year. And remember, many of those who survive Covid-19 nonetheless suffer permanent health damage.

snip

Awful as the pandemic outlook is, however, what worries me more is what our failed response says about prospects for dealing with a much bigger issue, one that poses an existential threat to civilization: climate change. As many people have noted, climate change is an inherently difficult problem to tackle — not economically, but politically.

Right-wingers always claim that taking climate seriously would doom the economy, but the truth is that at this point the economics of climate action look remarkably benign. Spectacular progress in renewable energy technology makes it fairly easy to see how the economy can wean itself from fossil fuels. A recent analysis by the International Monetary Fund suggests that a “green infrastructure push” would, if anything, lead to faster economic growth over the next few decades. But climate action remains very difficult politically given (a) the power of special interests and (b) the indirect link between costs and benefits.


snip

last paragraph

Obviously we need to keep trying to head off a climate apocalypse — and no, that’s not hyperbole. But even though the 2020 election wasn’t about climate, it was to some degree about the pandemic — and the results make it hard to be optimistic about the future.


good read, lots more at the snips - sorry about the paywall. I agree with Krugman.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT, Krugman "Why the 2020 Election Makes it Hard to be Optimistic About the Future" (Original Post) NRaleighLiberal Nov 2020 OP
reminds me of Wendall Berry quote handmade34 Nov 2020 #1
Let us prepare for the zombie apocalypse; it's easier than educating a Republican. Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2020 #2
TY. Paul Krugman is one of the best... Hekate Nov 2020 #3
Every time a Republican takes the Presidency, we inch closer to fascism. BlueTsunami2018 Nov 2020 #4
Trump was more like cross-country flight than an inch Celerity Nov 2020 #5

handmade34

(22,756 posts)
1. reminds me of Wendall Berry quote
Mon Nov 16, 2020, 10:24 PM
Nov 2020

"We have lived our lives by the assumption that what was good for us would be good for the world. We have been wrong. We must change our lives so that it will be possible to live by the contrary assumption, that what is good for the world will be good for us. And that requires that we make the effort to know the world and learn what is good for it."

Hekate

(90,686 posts)
3. TY. Paul Krugman is one of the best...
Tue Nov 17, 2020, 05:44 AM
Nov 2020

He was a link to sanity during the BushCheney admin — just an excellent liberal and excellent economist.

BlueTsunami2018

(3,492 posts)
4. Every time a Republican takes the Presidency, we inch closer to fascism.
Tue Nov 17, 2020, 06:45 AM
Nov 2020

We just barely avoided it this time. After the next time, there will be no next time. I feel like it’s inevitable.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT, Krugman "Why the 202...