Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oh give me a fucking break !! (Original Post) busterbrown Nov 2020 OP
You're going to need to be a bit more Karma13612 Nov 2020 #1
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2020 #2
at least 80% minority stopdiggin Nov 2020 #3
There has been affirmative action as they are government jobs treestar Nov 2020 #4
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2020 #7
Of course it shouldn't treestar Nov 2020 #10
Defunding is a Fox talking point-do not buy into it. Boxerfan Nov 2020 #5
Simple solutions are seldom adequate to solve complex problems. better Nov 2020 #8
not as unspoken as you might think . . . ever hear of the Oath Keepers? . . . OneBlueSky Nov 2020 #6
So are the Oath Keepers friend or foe? Shermann Nov 2020 #9

Response to busterbrown (Original post)

treestar

(82,383 posts)
4. There has been affirmative action as they are government jobs
Tue Nov 17, 2020, 05:45 PM
Nov 2020

There are many black cops. And female cops.

Your statement is an extreme exaggeration. The number of deaths is not so high as to put it like that. It's still an unusual way to go.

Response to treestar (Reply #4)

treestar

(82,383 posts)
10. Of course it shouldn't
Tue Nov 17, 2020, 07:12 PM
Nov 2020

But it does not always end in death. Only rarely does. That poster described it as if it happens in every case of a stop and even called the cops the army of the racist right. That's absurd.

Boxerfan

(2,533 posts)
5. Defunding is a Fox talking point-do not buy into it.
Tue Nov 17, 2020, 05:46 PM
Nov 2020

We want to de-criminalize the police. Those who use excess force are criminals & should be prosecuted as such.
We can re-prioritize and train but de-funding will get you on Tuckers show.

better

(884 posts)
8. Simple solutions are seldom adequate to solve complex problems.
Tue Nov 17, 2020, 07:10 PM
Nov 2020

Welcome to DU, by the way!

There are, however, a number of complexities that render defunding and starting over an inadequate (and likely actually counter-productive) solution.

Perhaps most significantly, because what police are depends GREATLY upon where you are.

This simple yet often overlooked fact is one of the most significant problems facing the BLM movement, in that where you happen to live can and does greatly influence the reality of dealing with police that you will get to experience. If I'd spent my entire life in the DC Metro area (and had been hiding under a rock and not seen the countless videos of egregious misconduct from many other places around the country), the grievances aired by BLM would likely strike me as largely unfounded, because they don't match that experience of it, where police culture actually is (at least in my experience) relatively well-rooted in actual public service.

But I've also lived in the deep south, and seen with my own two eyes that those grievances most emphatically ARE NOT unfounded. At least not everywhere, and as long as they're founded anywhere, we have important work to do.

I also take some issue with the notion that the race of the officers, or racial composition of the police force, is either the actual problem or the remedy. I've seen LEOs of color behave every bit as unacceptably as the overtly racist white asshole cops, within police forces that WERE overwhelmingly minority.

The actual problem, I think, lies in police culture, which spans race, but varies widely with geography.

Defunding the police sounds good on paper, but it's so dramatically oversimplified and under-explained that most don't even recognize what it actually suggests, which would be far more accurately and productively expressed as deburdening the police. The problem is not that police forces are over-funded, it's that they are dramatically overburdened, thanks in large part to the dismantling of our mental health treatment capacity over the last few decades.

We do need dramatic police reform, but we really must approach it more thoughtfully than looking primarily at such simplistic things as funding levels and racial force composition, because no combination of those two variables will solve the many serious problems that need to be solved.

We need to look much deeper, into things like what powers are afforded police, what responsibilities accompany those powers, what laws are being enforced against whom, how they're being enforced against whom, to what end and to whose benefit, on the basis of what deeper underpinnings, etc.



OneBlueSky

(18,536 posts)
6. not as unspoken as you might think . . . ever hear of the Oath Keepers? . . .
Tue Nov 17, 2020, 06:01 PM
Nov 2020

militant far-right group composed largely of cops and military . . . from Wikipedia:

Oath Keepers is an American far-right anti-government militia organization. The group describes itself as a non-partisan association of current and former military, police, and first responders, who pledge to fulfill the oath that all military and police take in order to "defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic". It encourages its members to not obey orders which they believe would violate the United States Constitution. The organization claims a membership of 35,000 as of 2016.

Several groups that monitor domestic terrorism and hate groups describe the Oath Keepers as extremist or radical. Mark Pitcavage of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) describes the group as "heavily armed extremists with a conspiratorial and anti-government mindset looking for potential showdowns with the government." The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) lists the group's founder as a known extremist and describes his announced plans to create localized militia units as "frightening". According to the SPLC, the group espouses a number of conspiracy and legal theories associated with the sovereign citizen movement and the white supremacist posse comitatus movement.

Shermann

(7,413 posts)
9. So are the Oath Keepers friend or foe?
Tue Nov 17, 2020, 07:10 PM
Nov 2020

I've demonstrated that Trump is the Chief Oath Breaker:

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100214557401

That should qualify him as Enemy Number One to the Oath Keepers.

And you know what they say about the enemy of your enemy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Oh give me a fucking brea...