Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSenate Keeps Confirming Trump's Nominees
https://politicalwire.com/2020/11/30/senate-keeps-confirming-trumps-nominees/Senate Keeps Confirming Trumps Nominees
November 30, 2020 at 11:36 am EST By Taegan Goddard
Less than two months remain in the Trump administration, and Senate Republicans are doing something not seen in a century confirming judges and other nominees after their party lost the White House. That norm-breaking rush to get GOP-approved picks through could get tricky, though, if lawmakers continue missing time because of COVID-19, Roll Call reports.
With only one exception, post-election confirmations of judges nominated to lifetime appointments by a president whose party has lost the White House hasnt happened since the election of 1896 when William McKinley was elected and the Senate confirmed Grover Clevelands picks.
During previous presidential election years, senators have invoked the so-called Thurmond rule, an unwritten agreement named after the late Sen. Strom Thurmond (R-SC) that calls for the chamber to stop approving circuit court nominations in the few months before Election Day.
With only one exception, post-election confirmations of judges nominated to lifetime appointments by a president whose party has lost the White House hasnt happened since the election of 1896 when William McKinley was elected and the Senate confirmed Grover Clevelands picks.
During previous presidential election years, senators have invoked the so-called Thurmond rule, an unwritten agreement named after the late Sen. Strom Thurmond (R-SC) that calls for the chamber to stop approving circuit court nominations in the few months before Election Day.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1005 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate Keeps Confirming Trump's Nominees (Original Post)
babylonsister
Nov 2020
OP
RainCaster
(10,870 posts)1. Rules? Republicans?
The only rule they are following is to burn down the barn on the way out.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)2. Rules do not apply to republicans for anything, so no surprise here
BlueJac
(7,838 posts)3. Assholes for ever!
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)4. Inflicting as much damage as possible ahead of the transition
The republicans defy all protocol to hold power
stillcool
(32,626 posts)5. Those aren't Trump's nominees...
they're Mitch McConnell's. Got to give credit, where credit is due.
The Thurmond Rule an unwritten rule, not legally binding holds that a judicial nominee should not be confirmed in the months leading up to an election. It has its origins in June 1968, when Senator Strom Thurmond, Republican of South Carolina, blocked President Lyndon B. Johnsons appointment of Justice Abe Fortas as chief justice.
It is not an actual rule, which means there is no way to adjudicate how close to an election it applies, or whether it applies at all. In June 2012, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, a Republican and the majority leader, invoked it to block President Obamas nominations to circuit courts. In December 2015, Senator Patrick Leahy, Democrat of Vermont, argued that the rule was invalid.
It is not an actual rule, which means there is no way to adjudicate how close to an election it applies, or whether it applies at all. In June 2012, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, a Republican and the majority leader, invoked it to block President Obamas nominations to circuit courts. In December 2015, Senator Patrick Leahy, Democrat of Vermont, argued that the rule was invalid.