General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat is the best way to donate to Warnock and Ossoff? I want the donations to go directly to
their respective campaigns. And what is the best time? is it Nov 30 or Dec 1, or does it make no difference?
dawg day
(7,947 posts)Here's Warnock's:
https://secure.actblue.com/donate/warnock-for-georgia_web?refcode=website&amount=5
You can choose to leave a "tip" for Act Blue's operational expenses, but I think everything else goes to the campaign.
I don't know about the best date. Sometimes the campaign will have a "matching donation", and that's probably the most effective time.
Beachnutt
(7,311 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... the one where the person or group doing the mailing gets to keep 30% (or something) per donation. I've seen that a lot recently. A politician or organization uses their mailing list to ostensibly raise money for a specific candidate (or candidates) but as a reward for their efforts, the fine print reveals that they're going to keep part of your donation for themselves.
That kind of grifting is dishonest and should be banned. It may not be technically illegal (since they DO inform the donor in very fine print... with light-gray text on a white background, probably.) But I can tell you that I think it's ethically wrong. If the organizations and politicians want to help raise money on someone else's behalf, then they should give 100% to the candidate (or cause) without keeping a little "vig" off the top.
beastie boy
(9,293 posts)It was one of the reasons I decided to ask before donating.
Thanks for the warning!
George II
(67,782 posts)....are those who do that.
Usually the email/message reads something like "split $10 between XXX, YYY, ZZZ and one other group"! You have to go to the link or even a second link sometimes to find out who that "one other group" is. Invariably it's for someone who isn't even running yet!!
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)It's just so sleazy and underhanded. It really reveals much about the politicians or organizations that would stoop to such tricks. As I said before, I'm sure it's all perfectly "legal" in the strictest sense of the word, but something that's technically legal isn't always necessarily ethical.
Caveat Emptor ... let the buyer beware.
sheshe2
(83,728 posts)Saw this on Broadway. Cabaret.
CottonBear
(21,596 posts)beastie boy
(9,293 posts)I didn't know where to look for it. Much appreciated