SCOTUS declines to hear gay marriage case (this is good for us)
Even with ACB, they seem inclined to leave precedent alone for the time being.
The Supreme Court of the United States denied certiorari Monday in a case that threatened to chip away at marriage equality. The Courts denial will disallow Indianas effort to discriminate against same-sex couples, and will continue to preserve the meaning of Obergefell v. Hodges.
Indiana Attorney General Curtis Hill (R) took the position in Box v. Henderson that same-sex spouses should not have the same rights to be listed on state-issued birth certificates as opposite-sex spouses. The case arose as the result of several lesbian couples who conceived via artificial insemination; Indiana refused to list birth mothers wives on their childrens official birth certificates, but regularly listed birth mothers husbands on birth certificates without additional requirement.
The same issue had been raised in response to Arkansas identical practice in Pavan v. Smitha 2017 Supreme Court case in which the Court also sided with the same-sex parents. A few months after Pavan, a three-judge panel of the Seventh Circuit heard oral arguments in Box v. Henderson. However, the Seventh Circuit waited nearly three yearsin time for SCOTUS to include two Trump-appointeesbefore handing down a unanimous ruling in favor of the same-sex parents in Box v. Henderson.
By the time Indiana appealed its loss at the Seventh Circuit, SCOTUS would include Justice Amy Coney Barrett, and many court-watchers wondered whether the change to the bench would result in the Courts eroding its landmark decision in Obergefell v. Hodges to allow the discrimination Indiana sought to conduct.
https://lawandcrime.com/supreme-court/even-with-three-trump-appointed-justices-on-the-bench-scotus-declines-to-roll-back-marriage-equality/