General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"The campaign started with 'Abolish ICE' and ended with "Defund the Police..."
Charlie Cook's assessment today (private briefing call) on why the down ballot races broke for the Republicans: the "socialism" tag worked.
jonstl08
(412 posts)Since I heard the phrase "Defund the Police" I about had a stroke because I knew the GOP would run with this. Virtually every ad my GOP rep tied her opponent to this phrase along with socialism. Definitely why she won. Need to get rid of this phrase for good.
DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)brooklynite
(94,601 posts)There will always be an Immigration and Border Protection agency; the key isn't the name, it's the leadership and corporate culture.
melman
(7,681 posts)Not something we've always had and will always have no matter what forever and always.
I'm sure you know this.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)And the mere relabeling of a department funded by billions does not deny the prior existence of a department funded by billions. "I'm sure you know this...."
Goodness gracious.
brooklynite
(94,601 posts)...four Chinese citizens onboard were rescued and taken to the United States...where they were turned away.
ICE didn't exist. The policy did.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Abolish ICE is from 2018 not 2020.
LeftInTX
(25,383 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)mcar
(42,334 posts)Under The Radar
(3,404 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....(which in some cases is unwarranted) under Democratic administrations or even reasonable republican administrations (rare, I know!)
As you point out, it's the leadership and manner in which the policies are carried out that has given it the presumed reputation that it has today.
No doubt we'll now see some examples of bad behavior posted as though they're a matter of routine.
dalton99a
(81,516 posts)Republicans wielded them very effectively
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Response to NurseJackie (Reply #11)
ehrnst This message was self-deleted by its author.
Magoo48
(4,716 posts)Let the fucking ICE evaporate.
Under The Radar
(3,404 posts)Defund the police was an ignorant statement that should have been corrected the moment that it was said by every democrat. But we just let it float out there while misinformation about BLM and ANTIFA were all scrambled into some sort of socialist omlet.
Ending Qualified Immunity - equal protection and accountability should have been the banner.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)And most Democrats did reject the term. Certainly Biden did. I know my Mayor Lori Lightfoot did. And many many others.
I dont think Democrats have poor messaging. I just think nobody listens to them. Thats even evident here, where every a Tweet Trump puts out there, and every a Fox News utterance gets more threads and more attention than any Democratic voice.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)what appears on fox et al, are some lw types using those 'bad' words.
No matter how emphatic Clyburn, et al were, those same types kept using those same 'bad' words - again and again.
Turin_C3PO
(14,004 posts)what slogans a section of the electorate uses. Our strategy must take that fact into account and plan accordingly.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)Its people outside the party. So maybe more who are in our party need to go on Fox News. Mayor Pete did, and he killed it.
Im so sick of the Democrats suck at messaging canard being bandied about here.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Cori Bush & Jamaal Bowman won primaries while supporting defund the police.
Biden never claimed he did neither did the Democrats who lost.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)JonLP24
(29,322 posts)If one city supports it why is that a problem? Democrats with their "messaging" should make it clear it is a local issue.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)whose faces and words, show up on fox. I suspect you know who those 'some lw types' are. They do it for national publicity, name recognition for themselves.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)The reason why he is fired a respected civil rights hero because of a Brietbart smear.
I'm not worried about what shows up on Fox. It is propaganda.
Perhaps they support it because they support the policies. The "bad slogan" people are just looking for an excuse to not support the policy.
Under The Radar
(3,404 posts)He does know how the game is played, and he has the ability to shut down right wing talking heads, he does need to teach all Democrats running for office how to use the talking points, because Dems still very much suck at it.
wellst0nev0ter
(7,509 posts)marylandblue
(12,344 posts)These are traditional Democratic messages and they easily tie into many of our current problems, not just policing. If we repeated it ad nauseam Republican style, it would have been heard.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)But then, it wasn't anyone else's city victimized night after night by police riots, so what would anyone care anywhere else? Those leopards will never, ever eat your faces.
brooklynite
(94,601 posts)We're going into a year with Mayor's races in almost every major City; I'm willing to bet that "Defund the Police" won't be a winning strategy for any Mayoral candidate.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Why are you railing against a local city budget issue anyway?
brooklynite
(94,601 posts)JonLP24
(29,322 posts)More voters blamed Democrats than Republicans for failed stimulus negotiations according to polls. Not sure why, I blame Mcconnell for the failed stimulus negotiations.
Under The Radar
(3,404 posts)Off that basis alone the statement was ridiculous.
2nd- laws without law enforcement are not worth the paper they are written on.
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)Please embrace the new (old) phrase, FUCK THE POLICE!
Cuthbert Allgood
(4,921 posts)their hatred of the police?
Cuthbert Allgood
(4,921 posts)Remember the "we need to win an election, so we need to go to the middle but once we do, we'll do the progressive thing." Except now it's "we needed to win an election and said what we need but anything bad that happened is the progressive's fault, so shut your mouth."
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)and you need BLM protests to help convince you to vote for Biden over Trump?
Turin_C3PO
(14,004 posts)we cant control what slogans protesters take up so were going to have to have a work-around strategy that involves trying to not let us get defined by the GOP as supporting such actions.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,357 posts)I'm definitely down with abolishing both ICE and police, though.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Of course they backed away from it after they won but they certainly used it while the right used fear mongering about the caravan.
Defund the police is actually good policy. I prefer @prisonculture takes on defund the police over any of your posts.
Link to tweet
You're not going to stop DSA from calling themselves socialists or conservatives from calling you socialists so good luck with that one.
brooklynite
(94,601 posts)We won the House in Suburban districts with moderate candidates who weren't yelling "Abolish ICE". That was coming from Democrats like AOC winning safe Blue seats from other Democrats in the cities.
mcar
(42,334 posts)It still is not true.
jayfish
(10,039 posts)When will we learn that it doesn't matter what nomenclature we use? The Thugs will demonize it all the same. If we said "reappropriate funding for law-enforcement" they would eventually arrive at "defund the police". Regardless of what the sentiment is they will call it what they please.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts).... election
If slogans were really beating them then what was their reactions to them?!?!
There's something wrong in down ballot races and"it as a slogan" sounds like an easy scapegoat
treestar
(82,383 posts)There are immigration laws - there are people who by law are deportable. We fight the accusation we are "open borders" and abolishing ICE essentially promotes that.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Listen I'd rather be a Democrat than a Republican right now. Trump is fracturing the party and they have far worse policies. The right wing populism scares the hell out of me. Not policies like Abolish ICE.
You all realize Trump is a wannabe dictator that hasn't conceded?
treestar
(82,383 posts)What has that to do with the price of eggs in China?
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)You're arguing against a point no one (I'll repeat that just in case, "no one" ) here is making.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts).... nationwide.
If slogans etc were really hurting Dems that much why wasn't there a national reaction in the DNC to them?
No, some shit happened down ballot against Dems and a slogan or word doesn't explain it.
ck4829
(35,077 posts)Buying stuff before a blizzard is soc... nope
Not wanting to get shot in school is soc... nope
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Democratic chances, but I do. We all know the names of socialists fully intelligent enough to know those terms were being used against us but promoted them publicly instead of using others. They knew that was a very possible result with razor-thin electoral margins in this era, just as they knew the same sabotage in 2016 threw the nation to Trump and the Republicans.
Revolutions must smash what exists to impose what they plan to impose next.
JanMichael
(24,890 posts)Which was ethically correct during a pandemic. Liberals or the left candidates did everything remotely; no rallies. Which again is the only intelligent and responsible thing to do. However the conservative candidates (or proxies) did go door to door almost everywhere and churches kept brainwashing. And most places (states) in the US are pretty 50/50. Counties are a different animal.
That was the margin. Not scientific just a hunch. I think we put too much belief in the TV and interwebs. Most races in non-70% one way counties (Left or Right) are not won electronically. People are weird. they like talking to other people face to face. Which now is a bad idea...
The door to door outreach and church/rally worked on the margins.
George II
(67,782 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)Some here will say otherwise, but its clear that was a lousy slogan that hurt us badly.