General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDo you think Biden might nominate Obama to SCOTUS?
I sure would like to see that done.
servermsh
(913 posts)mucifer
(23,547 posts)StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)mattclearing
(10,091 posts)Too old.
Johnny2X2X
(19,066 posts)We want someone as young as possible.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
rsdsharp
(9,182 posts)Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
arlyellowdog
(866 posts)MicaelS
(8,747 posts)FSogol
(45,488 posts)In It to Win It
(8,253 posts)FSogol
(45,488 posts)Celerity
(43,398 posts)Ketanji Brown Jackson is another who could be picked.
Sherrilyn Ifill is only around a year younger than Obama. Kagan was 49yo when Obama first started vetting her 11 years ago. Ifill is only 2 years younger than Kagan (now).
The 3 Trump SCOTUS justices (all 3 are Gen Xers) are all younger than Ifill (a Boomer) as well, Amy Coney Barrett closing in on 10 years younger.
TomCADem
(17,387 posts)Not only is she currently a State Supreme Court Justice now, but she was an accomplished appellate attorney before hand who argued several times before the United States Supreme Court.
Celerity
(43,398 posts)part of that time as well.
12 cases argued before SCOTUS.
What can we learn from Justice Leondra Krugers arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court? (2015)
http://scocablog.com/what-can-we-learn-from-justice-leondra-krugers-arguments-before-the-u-s-supreme-court/
Californias newest Supreme Court Justice, Leondra R. Kruger, served from 2007 to 2012 as an Assistant to the Solicitor General of the United States. Hired initially by Republican Solicitor General Paul Clement, Kruger served under six different confirmed or acting Solicitors General. When Neal Katyal was elevated to Acting Solicitor General in 2010 he appointed Kruger as his Acting Principal Deputy, the second-highest position in that office. Krugers appointment as Principal Deputy in 2010 capped an unusually fast rise, indicative of Krugers innate skills as well as her ability to command respect from peers and, indeed, experienced colleagues much older than she.
While in the Solicitor Generals office, Kruger argued twelve cases in front of the U.S. Supreme Court (and of course participated in the briefing of many more). In five of these cases, Kruger appeared for the principal party (as Petitioner or Respondent); and in seven, she argued as an Amicus or friend of the Court, a position that the Solicitor General is often granted to present the federal interest in a case where the federal government is not the direct party. One of the unique aspects of the Solicitor Generals role is how regularly the Court invites or allows that office to participate in oral argument, even as amicus, and how often the SGs amicus positions actually predominate in the Courts final decisions!
This post will not survey all of Krugers oral arguments; you can find a complete list and links to the audio of the arguments themselves here. (Interestingly, Krugers recent appointment was apparently so speedy that the Oyez audio file site doesnt even display a photo of her, as it does for most regular SCOTUS arguers.) However, by listening to a few of Krugers arguments, I think you can pick up some signals of what Justice Leondra Kruger will be like when sitting on the California Supreme Courts bench.
What comes across most consistently and immediately in the audio files of Krugers arguments is a remarkable ability to stay calm in the face of intense questioning. Indeed, her rare talent is to sound not just calm, but actually sensible and understanding, as she confronts a Justice or two known to be hostile to the governments position.
snip
FakeNoose
(32,639 posts)... because he's awesome at diplomacy. However it's safe to assume that Joe and Barack have talked this over. I'm sure Joe gave him first pick of whatever job he wanted. We'll soon see.
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)As a SC justice he disappears. We have other options.
Besides, I would be shocked if he desires to be a judge. Once a justice he would have to totally divorce himself from politics. Cant see him wanting that.
Bad Thoughts
(2,524 posts)Perhaps Barack would be open to it?
Sneederbunk
(14,291 posts)KentuckyWoman
(6,679 posts)He has well earned his right to follow his muse.
moonscape
(4,673 posts)accept anyway imo.
Lots of other young, solid choices. Why lock him up where we cant hear from him? We need him out here!
tman
(983 posts)mahatmakanejeeves
(57,464 posts)BGBD
(3,282 posts)Obama is going to be 60 soon. No reason to nominate anyone over 45 honestly. There are plenty of solidly liberal judges out there that are young and will carry that mantle for a long time.
Obama is much better serving as the parties elder statesman for years to come.
CatMor
(6,212 posts)msfiddlestix
(7,282 posts)But one person I learned was on the wish list apparently per Rachel Maddow, is Sherrilyn Ifill, law professor and president and director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. She was on Rachel's show a few nights ago, when Rachel popped the question. Ifill demurred. But that conversation revealed she's a strong favorite and looking at her creds holy moly. yeah we need her, she'd have my vote.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)Ifill began her career as a Fellow at the American Civil Liberties Union, before joining the staff of the LDF as an Assistant Counsel in 1988, where she litigated voting rights cases for five years.
In 1993 Ifill left LDF to join the faculty at University of Maryland School of Law in Baltimore. Over twenty years, Ifill taught civil procedure and constitutional law to thousands of law students, and pioneered a series of law clinics, including one of the earliest law clinics in the country focused on challenging legal barriers to the reentry of ex-offenders. Ifill is also a prolific scholar who has published academic articles in leading law journals, and op-eds and commentaries in leading newspapers. Her 2007 book On the Courthouse Lawn: Confronting the Legacy of Lynching in the 21st Century, was highly acclaimed, and is credited with laying the foundation for contemporary conversations about lynching and reconciliation. A 10th anniversary edition of the book was recently released with a Foreword by Bryan Stevenson, the acclaimed lawyer and founder of the national lynching memorial in Montgomery, AL.
In 2013, Ifill was invited back to the Legal Defense Fund this time to lead the organization as its 7th Director-Counsel. In that role, Ifill has increased the visibility and engagement of the organization in cutting edge and urgent civil rights issues, while maintaining the organizations decades-long leadership fighting voter suppression, inequity in education, and racial discrimination in application of the death penalty. At critical moments during national unrest following the killing of unarmed African Americans by law enforcement officers, Ifills voice and vision framed the issue of policing reform and urban deprivation with powerful clarity in media appearances and public discussions. Her forceful and fact-based analysis of complex issues of racial justice has made her a sought-after speaker and strategist whose counsel is sought by government officials, civic and community leaders, and national civil rights colleagues.
Ifill graduated from Vassar College in 1984 with a B.A. in English, and earned her J.D. from New York University School of Law in 1987. She has received honorary doctorates from New York University, Bard College, Fordham Law School and CUNY Law School. She serves on the board of the National Womens Law Center, the National Constitution Center and on the Advisory board for the Profiles in Courage Award. She is a past chair of U.S. board of the Open Society Foundations, one of the largest philanthropic supporters of civil rights and liberties in the country.
She serves on the board of the Learning Policy Institute and on the Advisory Board for the Profiles in Courage Award. She is a past chair of the U.S. board of the Open Society Foundations, one of the largest philanthropic supporters of civil rights and liberties in the country. https://www.naacpldf.org/about-us/staff/sherrilyn-ifill/
msfiddlestix
(7,282 posts)Did you happen to catch the interview the other night on Rachel's? If so, how did you 'read' her response to Rachel's question when she brought the prospect? I read her demur to be quite sincere, like it's the last thing on her mind. She's so dedicated to her work.
On the other hand, she could possibly be persuaded if she thought there was a chance and the President actually nominated her.
I think.
Well, I think it would be awesome.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)She played it really cool. She's smart enough to know that if she's on the short list, she needs to keep quiet about it. And if she's not, she needs to keep quiet about it.
msfiddlestix
(7,282 posts)That's a good thing for the reasons you stated.
brooklynite
(94,585 posts)helpisontheway
(5,008 posts)He is living the good life. Retired. He gets to quarantine in that beautiful new home. He has an opportunity to spend time with his spouse. Their nest is empty. Im sure they will travel the wood once the pandemic is over. The Republicans treated him like crap for 8 years. I want him to go out and enjoy the rest of his life.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,719 posts)Thekaspervote
(32,771 posts)StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)Liberty Belle
(9,535 posts)Judge Dana Sabraw ordered reunification of families separated at the border.
Judge Gonzalo Curiel found Trump University a fraud and endured racist taunts by Trump on social media.
tavernier
(12,389 posts)That would be his most valuable position. That job requires a best friend, preferably one who has been there before.
msongs
(67,412 posts)Xolodno
(6,395 posts)...has vetoed that idea already. Plus, Obama likes to be active and speak out, he has to shut that all down if he joins the SC.