General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEric Boehlert: Fox News "purge" confirms network shouldn't have White House credentials
Fox News "purge" confirms network shouldnt have White House credentials
Cut them off
Eric Boehlert
1 hr ago
Moving to eliminate any remaining vestiges of a news operation, Rupert Murdoch's Fox network summarily fired two political newsroom veterans this week. The heavy-handed move was seen as punishment for when the channel angered Trump loyalists on Election Night by correctly calling Arizona for Joe Biden.
Out are senior vice president and D.C. managing editor Bill Sammon, and politics editor Chris Stirewalt. The "purge," as network staffers have called it and included nearly 20 digital staffers, represents yet another confirmation that Fox News no longer pretends to be a journalistic outpost. Instead, facing new competition from the extreme far-right, the network eagerly sinks deeper into partisan, conspiratorial propaganda. And that's why the network doesn't deserve to have White House credentials for the new Democratic administration.
It's simple: Fox News isn't a newsgathering organization, therefore it does not need White House access. Giving them prestigious White House press passes just delays the much-needed Beltway discussion about the crooked network and its place in our political culture.
Today, its not possible for anyone in the press to make the argument that Fox News is a legitimate outlet. Dripping in demagoguery, the network doesn't even pretend any more. Last year, Shep Smith left when it became clear his 3 p.m. newscast was no longer welcome there. "I stuck with it for as long as I could and at some point I realized Id reached a point of diminishing returns and I left," he recently said.
"There is a concerted effort to get rid of real journalists," one departed Fox staffer told the Daily Beast, referring to the recent firings. "They laid capable people off who were actual journalists and not blind followers. Its essentially the final nail in the coffin for digital journalism at Fox. The week's purge comes as Sean Hannity's former producer, Porter Berry, takes control of running Fox's digital properties.
more...
https://pressrun.media/p/fox-news-purge-means-it-doesnt-deserve
The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)calimary
(81,295 posts)The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)John Ludi
(589 posts)reclassify themselves as "entertainment" a while back to avoid future litigation? If I remember correctly, that was a thing. So would that potentially invalidate any claim they have to have a right to sit at the grownup table?
John Ludi
(589 posts)apparently I was mistaken:
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/fox-news-entertainment-switch/
DLCWIdem
(1,580 posts)Their answer when Tucker Carlson was being sued was that they were entertainment and so nobody expected them them to be truthful.
While others find Snopes a good source I do not. In that article I can find no mention of the legal brief. Which, IMO, should have been included.
Another example was that a couple of years ago there was a question about those awful yard lawnboy decorations. People were claiming that they were used to help identify stops by the underground railroad.
Snopes said the claim was falae because the could not find any documented written historical evidence. However, Snopes completely overlooked the fact that the study of history has changed. Historians no longer rely on only written documents they have expanded the research to include the use oral histories and traditions.
uponit7771
(90,344 posts)John Ludi
(589 posts)thanks for pointing that out. I'd think that that would serve as a precedent.
malaise
(269,020 posts)so they should not have credentials
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)Fox News was entertainment and not News so it was ok for Fox to lie.
Danascot
(4,690 posts)I did find this story from September concerning a slander suit brought against Tucker Carlson by Karen McDougal:
She wrote: "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."
https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/917747123/you-literally-cant-believe-the-facts-tucker-carlson-tells-you-so-say-fox-s-lawye
The problem with this Trump appointed judges' opinion is that the average Fox viewer is not a "reasonable viewer with an appropriate amount of skepticism'. That's deliberate on Fox' part. They have groomed their viewers to believe all kinds of ridiculous claims over a period of many years.
calimary
(81,295 posts)NOT Fox News.
Come to think of it, maybe thats how we should write it. Fox News.
lindysalsagal
(20,692 posts)Buns_of_Fire
(17,180 posts)After all, a potential of 74 million nutjob viewers is a very attractive demograpnic. I don't know how long any of them can last with only MyPillow and Goya Beans as their main advertisers, though.
MontanaMama
(23,317 posts)Traitor45 allowed them in the briefing room.
samsingh
(17,599 posts)fux news is the reason we almost lost democracy in my opinion.
✊!
Stuart G
(38,428 posts)to available to all of us. Then in a few weeks, when it starts to really hurt, and advertisers..."bail out"
changes will take place....As many have said before, and many will say again................................
.......MONEY IS THE NAME OF THE GAME.....AND THE ONLY NAME OF THE GAME...........
samsingh
(17,599 posts)pwb
(11,275 posts)One hour a week. Cable providers need a little regulation.
uponit7771
(90,344 posts)... pushing FAUX News further to the right as if they could go any further.
librechik
(30,674 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,173 posts)not the propaganda machine. "Fair and balanced" was always a cover for the exact opposite to see what they could get away with, in my view.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)uponit7771
(90,344 posts)dalton99a
(81,513 posts)The only news station they watch
Silent3
(15,217 posts)...look at recent events and realize it was time to go the other direction, that they might be proud that they'd not only correctly called the election, but had landed on the right side of history when they occasionally challenged Trump.
Silly me.
DLCWIdem
(1,580 posts)LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,586 posts)Allowing them to speak only eats up time that could be used for real journalists to ask questions to gain knowledge that informs readers and viewers.
The WH should deny Fox, OANN, NewsMax, etc. credentials and allow only established news sources to be present.
PirateRo
(933 posts)Would you please repost a proper link to determine provenance?
babylonsister
(171,066 posts)SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)caballojm
(272 posts)since they don't report actual news. Just as Cheez Whiz can't use the word "cheese."
rdking647
(5,113 posts)rather than pulling their credentials just never call on them at a press breifing
make it clear to any of his appointees that they arent to grnt fox any interviews
VA_Jill
(9,979 posts)is registered as an "entertainment" network, so why should they get WH credential anyway? Inquiring minds &c.
moose65
(3,167 posts)Shep Smith was probably the best thing Fox News ever had.
They used to claim that there was a "wall" between their news division and their "opinion" shows. The "news" was on during the day between 9 - 5 when there weren't many people actually watching. The line between the two has been very, very thin in the age of Trump, though!
The evening shows are just atrocious. They are talk shows, pure and simple. Jerry Springer and Maury Povich. What you're watching isn't news - you're watching actors on a set. They don't even make a pretense of "fair and balanced" any longer.
Initech
(100,079 posts)Well duh! We had a president for four years who called everything he didn't agree with fake news, and wanted to replace the New York Times seat at the WHPC with fucking Infowars, so there is that. I could have told you that!
Skittles
(153,164 posts)IT'S REPUKE CRAP
Oneironaut
(5,500 posts)The new Republican Party audience demands Fascist rhetoric rather than facts. Even with Trump gone, we are in trouble. Im not sure how we stop Republicans free-fall into Fascism. The next logical fall downward is types like Josh Hawley and Lauren Boebert being the norm, with even more extreme Fascists as the outliers.