Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How can there be only 10-million unemployed when a million people a week are filing for UI? (Original Post) stopbush Jan 2021 OP
Good question Bayard Jan 2021 #1
I want to know too. Mike 03 Jan 2021 #2
Go check out the U6 unemployment rate. roamer65 Jan 2021 #3
+1 n/t Laelth Jan 2021 #11
Rounding errors? LiberalArkie Jan 2021 #4
Millions aren't looking for work, so they don't count. unblock Jan 2021 #5
The definition of unemployed doesn't fit pandemics Cicada Jan 2021 #6
The "official numbers" are INDICATORS--nothing more. Laelth Jan 2021 #7
I am on UI in CA, where we are currently told that we do not need to look for work stopbush Jan 2021 #9
If you're getting benefits, you count as unemployed--always. Laelth Jan 2021 #12
Because once you stop collecting you don't count Jersey Devil Jan 2021 #8
There is also the possibility that kurtcagle Jan 2021 #10
When I looked into this years ago... CaptainTruth Jan 2021 #13
Also some people who were receiving benefits are finding jobs while others lose theirs. chowder66 Jan 2021 #14
Nicolle just said the number is 16-million. stopbush Jan 2021 #15

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
2. I want to know too.
Fri Jan 22, 2021, 02:12 PM
Jan 2021

Does that number include people who have "given up looking"?

Just yesterday in our local paper it says unemployment in my county is almost 8%, and slightly lower for the state overall.

unblock

(52,240 posts)
5. Millions aren't looking for work, so they don't count.
Fri Jan 22, 2021, 02:14 PM
Jan 2021

That's how millions more people are collecting unemployment benefits while not considered "unemployed"

Cicada

(4,533 posts)
6. The definition of unemployed doesn't fit pandemics
Fri Jan 22, 2021, 02:14 PM
Jan 2021

If you are not looking for a job, because being a waitress might kill you, you are not unemployed. You are just taking a vacation. Or if you must take care of kids at work.

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
7. The "official numbers" are INDICATORS--nothing more.
Fri Jan 22, 2021, 02:14 PM
Jan 2021

As I understand it, the “official number” counts only those presently receiving benefits and actively searching for work. It doesn’t even come close to accounting for the actual number of people who are unemployed. Once benefits run out, you’re no longer counted as unemployed, regardless of whether or not you actually have a job.



-Laelth

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
9. I am on UI in CA, where we are currently told that we do not need to look for work
Fri Jan 22, 2021, 02:23 PM
Jan 2021

during the pandemic.

In normal times, you would need to occasionally report three attempts a week to find a job.

Which is to say, I don’t see how they’d stop counting us as being unemployed for not looking for work when the State is telling us not to bother looking.

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
12. If you're getting benefits, you count as unemployed--always.
Fri Jan 22, 2021, 02:35 PM
Jan 2021

Once benefits expire, you will no longer count in U1, U2, or U3 (and U3 is the standard, most-often cited rate).

More here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unemployment_in_the_United_States

-Laelth

kurtcagle

(1,603 posts)
10. There is also the possibility that
Fri Jan 22, 2021, 02:30 PM
Jan 2021

like everything that came out of the Trump administration, the numbers were deliberately cooked by senior BLS staffers. There's been a weird accounting trick where, early on, about 3 million people who were furloughed were counted as being "on vacation". I do not know whether that was ever rectified, but I'd question the accuracy of the BLS until Biden has a chance to clean house there. As a guess, the real number is probably around 13.5 to 14.5 million, with underemployed likely in the 20 million+ range.

CaptainTruth

(6,592 posts)
13. When I looked into this years ago...
Fri Jan 22, 2021, 02:41 PM
Jan 2021

...I discovered that the government's official unemployed number is actually the number of people currently collecting unemployment.

There could be millions more whose unemployment has run out & they still don't have a job, but they're not included in that number.

chowder66

(9,070 posts)
14. Also some people who were receiving benefits are finding jobs while others lose theirs.
Fri Jan 22, 2021, 04:53 PM
Jan 2021

This is In addition to other responses here.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How can there be only 10-...