General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMTG wants to debate AOC on the GND? Get the popcorn ready!!!
Link to tweet
?s=20
Link to tweet
?s=20
Link to tweet
?s=20
Duncanpup
(12,924 posts)johnthewoodworker
(694 posts)Ilsa
(61,709 posts)Butterflylady
(3,553 posts)Thanks for the laugh.
Grins
(7,243 posts)To spout her stew-pud.
THAT is what Greene wants, a forum.
It will solve nothing; no minds will be changed.
Comment snips will be edited and endlessly forwarded and forwarded by the Reich.
I dont understand why AOC is even bothering to participate. There is no win here.
central scrutinizer
(11,665 posts)The dough will pour in from the Q-cultists.
wnylib
(21,672 posts)the whole thing (14 pages). That's her excuse to avoid a direct confrontation on something she knows nothing about and never will, no matter how many times she reads the proposal.
MTG does not want to debate AOC. She just wants to spout stupid stuff about the green new deal.
Claire Oh Nette
(2,636 posts)AOC, I mean.
Participating.
Pretty sure Greene's tweet is not in any way a record of that exchange.
More like:
Q: Did you drop this?
AOC: Oh, yes, thank you.
Q: Can I have your autograph?
AOC: Sure. Who should I make it out to???
usaf-vet
(6,221 posts)jimfields33
(16,032 posts)Not even in same district or even state.
Deuxcents
(16,370 posts)She will try to turn this into some kind of circus. AOC should ignore her as she has no credibility.
It won't be a debate. It will be MTG accusing AOC that she wants everyone to walk 200 miles and not eat meat.
Claire Oh Nette
(2,636 posts)AOC has no reason to debate Greene.
AOC has written legislation, and the House can debate it.
Greene behaves as though
1) she's in high school
2) she matters
Perhaps she ought to review what happened when Lindsey Graham and John (no relation) Kennedy debated Georgia Voter Suppression laws. For someone who eschews education, she certainly wants to be publicly schooled.
This is like Krazy Kim of North Korea wanting to meet and take pictures with Trumpy so he could look relevant.....
Kid Berwyn
(15,005 posts)Legitimacy they lack, so they hope some rubs off.
It's just another one of her ploys for attention, and for campaign donations. Hopefully, AOC doesn't bite.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)takes her job a lot more seriously than any MAGAT.
I hope AOC doesnt do the debate, even if its just to deprive Greene of a platform.
Lovie777
(12,357 posts)the other one will debate on conspiracy theories.
MiHale
(9,788 posts)Telling people she can read and complete a task.
iluvtennis
(19,883 posts)NNadir
(33,578 posts)Doing so would raise the status of the insect.
I have no use whatsoever for the so called "green new deal," since I regard it as an ideologically conservative bill advancing an approach to climate change, one which despite popular enthusiasm has failed already, but my objections involve engineering and thermodynamic considerations and are not the insane mutterings of a certifiable nutcase illiterate who should be consigned to being treated as such.
bucolic_frolic
(43,374 posts)mental thuggery vs. intelligence and class
FakeNoose
(32,831 posts)We already know that Alexandra is a smart and tough cookie. She certainly can hold her own in any brisk debate of the issues. But why give the free airtime to Greene, who doesn't deserve it? All Greene wants is some red meat to throw to the Magats.
AOC should find a better debate partner and more a productive way to spend her time.
Carlitos Brigante
(26,505 posts)Grins
(7,243 posts)Alpeduez21
(1,759 posts)The fascist will just shout stupid right wing talking points over the reasonable discourse AOC will attempt. No minds will be changed, no actual debate will happen and it will become video fodder for Faux news.
Basically, Marjorie Taylor Green will act like that child rapist Jordan. If it were me I wouldn't even respond. Of course, I'm not as smart as Representative Cortez so there's that.
Orangepeel
(13,933 posts)there is no way to win when your opponent just knocks over the pieces and shits on the board while loudly squawking.
SheilaAnn
(9,711 posts)"debate" may just be a charitable nod to MTG, knowing she will slay her in the end..LOL.
brush
(53,925 posts)assignments. She's a nobody without creating a stir to get notice.
If I were AOC I wouldn't debate her. Don't give her the visibility the she craves as she's trying to piggyback on AOC's popularity.
wyn borkins
(1,109 posts)I read JRehling's remark (tweet) as "Sometime In The Year 3535" wherein (one-hit-wonder) Rick Evans states (that MTG says) "Ain't gonna need to tell the truth..."
enraged pedestrian
(2 posts)So hard in 2021 to find a Zager and Evans reference, TY, LOL, nice job, u must be like me, over 65
wyn borkins
(1,109 posts)Thank You. Now when you reach my age, I'll pass my walker onto you, as I won't be needing it anymore...
central scrutinizer
(11,665 posts)I grew up in Nebraska and hits by local talent were rare so that ridiculous song was played a lot.
wyn borkins
(1,109 posts)Perhaps Link to tweet
" target="_blank">this might 'clear-out' those pesky ear worms...
Rebl2
(13,575 posts)AOC has better things to do with her time.
rateyes
(17,438 posts)wits with an unarmed person.
wiggs
(7,820 posts)a problem that needs a solution. Because that's the first crossroads...MTG and the like deny there's a need to address environmental damage and climate change in the first place. So ANY proposal to address those issues will be criticized and obstructed.
Get them to acknowledge the problem first because most americans believe there's a problem. Build from there.
Norbert
(6,041 posts)Please proceed Marjorie.
NQAS
(10,749 posts)Governance is not WWE or WWF in suits. MTG - Traitor, for short - is just trying to be relevant. She isn't, and never will be, other than as a traitor and, potentially, as a domestic terrorist.
When the legislation makes it way to the floor for debate, debate it. End of.
Now, go away.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Smart and trust she will keep it up.
I notice her Twitter's list of people to follow shows the WH, Biden, Harris, Stacey Abrams, Michelle Obama. And Twitter's list of people similar to her includes all our Democratic leaders and some of her farther-left house colleagues. I didn't see the anti-Democratic Party activists who got her elected to congress and who she originally brought to DC with her or the 2016-2020 surrogates like Nina Turner, but she did endorse Turner for congress.
DinahMoeHum
(21,817 posts). . .playing to her rube voters so they will waste their life's savings on her.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)before she was perfect-stormed into congress, so she probably really likes what she's part of now.
When the RW extremism dies down,... But when's when? The Nazis' version got control and had Germany by the throat for 15 years before destroying it and themselves. Absolutely worst case, of course. Maybe she'll be out of congress, shopping for beach houses and fighting FEC rulings, after the next election.
fescuerescue
(4,448 posts)OMG! WTF?
BRB
ShazzieB
(16,564 posts)But seriously, it's not really a new thing to use initials as a shortcut for people with names that are long enough to be a pain to type out. AOC's full name is a mouthful and a keyboard full, and I will never type it all out if I can avoid it. 3 keystrokes instead of 24 (counting letters and spaces)? Hell, yeah.
DBoon
(22,403 posts)progressoid
(50,000 posts)She'll get the attention she craves.
BobTheSubgenius
(11,572 posts)...meet with someone that DOES know what they're talking about. get them to explain the more demanding, (3-syllable+ parts) and, most importantly, teach her some talking points.
In It to Win It
(8,296 posts)struggle4progress
(118,379 posts)Johonny
(20,916 posts)She just wants attention.